| Turtle Necks or Sweater Vests? |
| Turtle Neck |
|
6% |
[ 1 ] |
| Sweater Vest |
|
33% |
[ 5 ] |
| 17.5 divided by 2 |
|
60% |
[ 9 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:43 pm
What?
Also, Alive 2007.
Best album ever.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:23 pm
Psh. That mission's nothing compared to one of mine.
17 pages or so in MS Word.
To find it, have a peek at my character bio. It's the two-part mission on pages 2000 and 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:00 pm
Thard_Verad Psh. That mission's nothing compared to one of mine. 17 pages or so in MS Word. To find it, have a peek at my character bio. It's the two-part mission on pages 2000 and 2002. Good mission. Good mission. On a side note: Portal 2 is released biggrin And my activity is going to be severely limited because of school. Only a few more weeks to go and I'm free for like 3 months! YESSS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:01 pm
Anyone know a good set for a Harvest Exeggutor? I keep trying to make one but I can't get it quite right. I don't know what Berry to abuse D:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:14 pm
Prob'ly depends on what you want to do with it. Petaya is an obvious choice, but you have to deal with a lack of speed. Salac could combo well with Substitute or Protect. Liechi for a surprise physical tree.
Branching into other areas of combat, Chesto Berry for unlimited Resting. Or better, Lum for unlimited Rest AND miscellaneous status recovery. Sitrus can keep you healed a lot also, but you lose the status protection to gain the move slot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:49 pm
GLaDOS is a potato.
I quit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:14 pm
Ginji, why are your simulations giving you temperatures below freezing? Using Arctic data?
(As I recall, 271.3 K = 0 C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:18 pm
Thard_Verad Ginji, why are your simulations giving you temperatures below freezing? Using Arctic data? (As I recall, 271.3 K = 0 C) Because the atmos coefficient we are suppose to use for the 1st trial is .5 (to test if it works). Then we are suppose to find the coefficient that gives us about 15 Celsius.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:24 pm
Ginji of Thunder Thard_Verad Ginji, why are your simulations giving you temperatures below freezing? Using Arctic data? (As I recall, 271.3 K = 0 C) Because the atmos coefficient we are suppose to use for the 1st trial is .5 (to test if it works). Then we are suppose to find the coefficient that gives us about 15 Celsius. So you're ACTUALLY looking for about 286 Kelvins?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:29 pm
Thard_Verad Ginji of Thunder Thard_Verad Ginji, why are your simulations giving you temperatures below freezing? Using Arctic data? (As I recall, 271.3 K = 0 C) Because the atmos coefficient we are suppose to use for the 1st trial is .5 (to test if it works). Then we are suppose to find the coefficient that gives us about 15 Celsius. So you're ACTUALLY looking for about 286 Kelvins? Yes, but first I have to make it hit 241.3 K to make sure the darn thing works. And so far it's given me jack squat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:30 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:38 pm
None so big as floccinaucinihilipilification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:44 pm
Thard_Verad None so big as floccinaucinihilipilification. Or pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicavolcanoconiosis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
