|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 1:07 am
Well, I see that 'your asian-ness' has found something to occupy him. o_O;
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:32 am
Xenosaga 2: hoping it won't somehow ruin anything in that game for you, I've never seen someone immortal die more times in such a short time span.
Anyhow, I liked it, better than the first at least. I found the game was set up differently from the first so, despite apparantly being longer as it had two disks, I actually got through it a lot quicker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:25 am
Snake Eater was ******** brilliant. The Mosin Nagant was bad-a** too. domokun
Never played Xenosaga, any of them, so my opinion is withheld... surprised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 5:24 am
The star wars vs star trek video was factually incorrect; but then using stock footage it be hard to actually get any where close to an actual statement of what type of fire power the Empire can throw out. Also it has ben proven that TIEs do infact have shields. Yeah, realisticly that video wouldn't have lasted longer then the first shot of the star destroyer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:23 am
However, they said 'minimal shielding', not 'no shields', so poo on you. razz Also, I don't see how the video would have ended at the first shot of the star destroyer, considering star trek shields > star wars shields in a massive way. Picard > Palpatine Psychofish Xenosaga 2: hoping it won't somehow ruin anything in that game for you, I've never seen someone immortal die more times in such a short time span. Not mentioning anything about the game at all... that's just got to suck. Y'know? I mean the whole "Hahaha! I am immortal! You can't kill me!" "Yeah, but I so totally pwn you.", followed by the immortal person being repeatedly face-raped by many, many, many things and not being able to take the easy way out. 'Sweet Merciful Death' has no hold, so the poor little immortal is left being consti-owned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:33 am
Omg, someone's finally on. crying Thank god.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:34 am
I'm on, but I think you knew that. XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:40 am
I'm on, but I think I'm gonna go now... I responded in the one fight I had to, and I've got to go pick up a packet and do a worksheet before my next class starts.
Stupid packet. Probably gonna cost me like $30 again... xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:52 am
I say that... yet I'm still here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:58 am
True, that's one thing they got right. But then unless the star destroyer was firing its point defense guns then there'd be no way for the enterprise to win. The medium turbolasers on a twenty year old troop transportship rank at 200 gigatons per shot. That's an order of magnitude greater then what the federation uses. Their photon torps top out at about 79 megatons and their quantum ones roughly twice that. The debate is dead, Empire wins. And I see your Picard with Palpatine from Dark Empire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 12:00 pm
See, people call me a trekkie, but its times like this that I can deny it cause I'm not arguing, just going *TEH SHRUG!*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 12:00 pm
And yet... their shields go down HARD.
Victory goes to the person who shoots first. Like an old-fashioned high noon quickdraw duel. mad
...okay, I'm gone.
edit: after a brief glance at that page, I have only this to say: "Someone has too much time on their hands".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 12:03 pm
I was ignored. Not fun.
Then again... I never really cared in the first place.
I shouldn't post unless I actually have something to say. But Star Wars vs Star Trek doesn't interest me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 12:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
