|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:48 pm
Typhoon_Omi Explain how the imagehost you use is, in any shape, way, or form superior to ImageShack. Thus far, you've not even given one example why ImageShack sucks. It's not "difficult", I'd be surprised if you actually have issues working it. Imageshack's TOS bans messing with the link codes in any way. Bans have actually HAPPENED for that. Plus, they have ads, almost obnoxiously so given their aforementioned analness. Quote: And the anime plot, filler or no, is starting to rebound again. Plus, what in the HELL, Gelmax? The blood's inconsistant in one spot on the latter. The eyes are the exact. damned. same. Even the head is, that's actually pretty good filler art, save the left shoulder in the middle scene seems blurred slightly. Now, the top one's lighting is horrid, but still not all that bad - and I'd need to see the scene so I know he didn't just turn around or something. That's shitty sarcasm, but that's to be expected since you're overusing it on the internet without the proper emphasis. Anonymooo Edit: Also, I love how people go into the whole "nerd" thing when they can't explain their opinions. Jesus H. Christ, gotta love it. Like I said--nerd, or "KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT"--it means the exact same thing to me. Do your ******** research before talking like an authority. Since when do I need to explain an opinion? Now, if I was claiming to spout FACTS, I might need to explain them, but I was unaware that I was supposed to SUPPORT my opinion that you're a dumbass (oh, wait, I DID, WITH THAT PICTURE I POSTED). Your whole long big rant made no good points at all, too, because I was not comparing Bleach filler to ******** Kyoto Animation, I was comparing it to Naruto filler - done by the same studio. And if you're going to go on about "production values" and how we shouldn't expect quality from a 60+ episode series, then you can't call Naruto filler sucky because it's up to episode 190+.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:51 pm
Honestly I don't have a real opinion about the Naruto filler, since I haven't watched much of it--note that I never stated any such opinions on it as my own.
You also didn't just compare Bleach filler to Naruto filler--you brought in talk of anatomical discrepancies in the animation, and told somebody to go learn anatomy all over again, which appeared to me like a general artistic comparison--thus, my quite-valid point of mentioning different studios, their work, and how BUDGET AFFECTS QUALITY. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:57 pm
I'd guess that Naruto gets a higher budget than Bleach. I don't know, but that would be my guess, since its ranked higher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:58 pm
Binatica Imageshack's TOS bans messing with the link codes in any way. Bans have actually HAPPENED for that. Plus, they have ads, almost obnoxiously so given their aforementioned analness. Quote: That's shitty sarcasm, but that's to be expected since you're overusing it on the internet without the proper emphasis.
It gives you the url in BBCode,  is an example of poor sarcasm; are they really, or are they not? Dunno, won't know.
Both offer a 1 MB upload, url uploading..
ImageShack dislikes porn & hentai, so those whom wanna hotlink things of that sort'd find the domain using it banned, if it was often used for such things.
Waffle.. seems to randomly dislike images being hotlinked of any type on a message boards, as your first uploaded image showed. Why would you want to host an individual image online, and be given a BBCode link to it, unless you wanted to post it somewhere? The message it gave makes no.. sense.
Plus, Waffle's theme is pretty murky, brown, and not too good looking. ImageShack's is simple, clean, and smooth.
FireFox & IE have extensions and plug-ins for ImageShack.
I doubt many internet browsers even know what ol' Waffle is.
Not like I give much of a damn; you can use any imagehost you want, obviously. I'm just saying, I see few if any reasons why Waffle is "better", or that ImageShack is "SUCKING!!1".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:59 pm
Naruto's series director, Date Hayato, has a weird way of apportioning his massive budget--he spends a good third (sometimes a little less) of the season's budget on a handful of episodes by the stylish-as-all-hell Matsumoto Norio (he did episodes 29, 48, 80, 133, and a handful of others) and then divides the rest sorta-evenly among the other episodes' production. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:05 pm
Interesting.
I noticed how the animation quality suddenly drops during the Naruto/Sasuke fight and a handful of others. I think maybe Sasuke/Oro but my memory could be failing me there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:07 pm
Yeah, 29 was Matsumoto's first full episode--the Sasuke-Orochimaru fight--before that, he'd only done a portion of... I think it was like 16 or 18 or something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:18 pm
Typhoon_Omi And 3.'s not a relevent point, and thus far, pretty unsubstanciated. Typhoon_Omi ..I did? Funny. 'Cause, I don't think I did. o_o Try Googling it. Because, I spelled it correctly. Yeah. Typhoon_Omi I've responed to every point you made, unlike you, whom's given little backing to anything you said, and whom occasionally decides to totally strike out or erase comments because you don't deem them "worthy". No you haven't, and any examples?
Excuse me for trimming the fat that is your redundancy. Close, ecstuffuan. Typhoon_Omi ..Hn. Funny. I'm not trying to 'look superior'. Looks like you're the only one acknowledging that point. o_o You've not proven me "wrong", at any topic, once. You've not even offered any back-ups to your claims, save "i'm right, ur wrong omg u fewl u off-topic and using movie quotes ahhh". lolz *slaps* Go make me breakfast.
Wrong. ^^" Typhoon_Omi If you're gonna quit, at least admit defeat. Seriously, that was a pathetic 'arguement' on your side. domokun Ah well. Eat. Use a convenient excuse just when you're going nowhere. <******** you're insecure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:27 pm
Hi Diety. How's the shimmying going?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:40 pm
Oh, very nicely... . =; ...Deity'll probably post in his fight momentarily, then try and get some drawing done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:47 pm
..That so proved me wrong. Plus, what dictionary? [By the way: click the link yourself. God, you make me wonder. XD]Quote: No you haven't, and any examples?
Excuse me for trimming the fat that is your redundancy. Quote: lolz *slaps* Go make me breakfast.
Wrong. ^^" Quote: <******** you're insecure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:53 pm
Typhoon_Omi ..That so proved me wrong. Plus, what dictionary? [By the way: click the link yourself. God, you make me wonder. XD] The Dictionary.com dictionary. *clicks the link, sees his screencap perfectly, shrugs* Typhoon_Omi .. Whuhr? eek Is Shoyriu becoming a hypocrite AND LOSING GRASP OF HIS MOTOR SKILLS WHILST TYPING!? Please prove my point a little harder this time. Typhoon_Omi Yeah. Again: Waffle doesn't work. ********, you're insecure*. Commas are your friend, Mr. Wanna-Be Grammar Nazi. Yeah, again, it does, lololol The comma isn't required retard, especially since it implies a pause. I write how I speak, when I wrote that, I didn't want a pause in speech. Therefore, the comma was left out. Edit: Since your computer is as retarded as you are: "The dictionary disagrees with you." <******** you're insecure."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 8:06 pm
Shouyin The Dictionary.com dictionary. *clicks the link, sees his screencap perfectly, shrugs* Quote: Please prove my point a little harder this time. Quote: Yeah, again, it does, lololol
The comma isn't required retard, especially since it implies a pause.
I write how I speak, when I wrote that, I didn't want a pause in speech. Quote: Therefore, the comma was left out. Edit: Since your computer is as retarded as you are:
Seriously. Using the word 'retard' every sentence doesn't make you right.Quote: "The dictionary disagrees with you." <******** you're insecure."
Also, lovely, pointless image. High five. If that's you: Bwahaha, HAH, hah.. hah. Hah. [Light chortle in your face.] Hah.
Yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 8:11 pm
I'm bored, what else is there to do in this place?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
