|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:00 pm
FUUUUUUUUCK ARENA ABUSE TAKES FOREVER
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:01 pm
Allegro Hashire Kazemeijin Teh AK No, see, that'd work if you were gay or something, but you're not. You want to ******** children. That's gross. It's the same thing. It falls under the same category of "sexual orientation" along with gay, Lesbian, Shotacon, ect. Judging me like this is the same thing as judging a gay person because of their preference even though yu said "that'd work."
And I'm not stupid enough to act on my wants in illegal ways.Just don't move to Ireland, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, or Sweden, because Loli is illegal there. I never intended to. Although that ruling is a bunch of bull because it doesn't qualify as CP under it's definition as to why it's illegal.
@Fish: Yes, it's an orientation. It's the same thing as as gay/lesbian/bi/ect, just a different target.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:04 pm
Hashire Kazemeijin Allegro Hashire Kazemeijin Teh AK No, see, that'd work if you were gay or something, but you're not. You want to ******** children. That's gross. It's the same thing. It falls under the same category of "sexual orientation" along with gay, Lesbian, Shotacon, ect. Judging me like this is the same thing as judging a gay person because of their preference even though yu said "that'd work."
And I'm not stupid enough to act on my wants in illegal ways.Just don't move to Ireland, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, or Sweden, because Loli is illegal there. I never intended to. Although that ruling is a bunch of bull because it doesn't qualify as CP under it's definition as to why it's illegal.
@Fish: Yes, it's an orientation. It's the same thing as as gay/lesbian/bi/ect, just a different target.for those who missed it, he's talking about 5 year old v****a
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:05 pm
Hashire Kazemeijin I never intended to. Although that ruling is a bunch of bull because it doesn't qualify as CP under it's definition as to why it's illegal.
@Fish: Yes, it's an orientation. It's the same thing as as gay/lesbian/bi/ect, just a different target. If the characters are defined as underage, artistic renditions of them in the nude or performing sexual acts counts as child porn, just as if some sick ******** drew a picture of a real little girl blowing her dad. And you can get defensive, but the thing is, people are allowed to have sexual limits. I don't like piss, and I'd have a major probelm with anyone who shoved it in my face like you do with loli.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:06 pm
Allegro Hashire Kazemeijin I never intended to. Although that ruling is a bunch of bull because it doesn't qualify as CP under it's definition as to why it's illegal.
@Fish: Yes, it's an orientation. It's the same thing as as gay/lesbian/bi/ect, just a different target. If the characters are defined as underage, artistic renditions of them in the nude or performing sexual acts counts as child porn, just as if some sick ******** drew a picture of a real little girl blowing her dad. And you can get defensive, but the thing is, people are allowed to have sexual limits. I don't like piss, and I'd have a major probelm with anyone who shoved it in my face like you do with loli. THANK YOU. WE HAVE A WINNER.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:09 pm
Allegro's got a point. You should keep it under your hat. Gaia's banned people for less. neutral What you like is nobody's business but your own, and when you make it someone else's business, they have a right not to like it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:09 pm
l-Kathulu-l Silly gaians real people interacting through a series of tubes.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:10 pm
OMG, Hash changed his Avi eek
Hello there children!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:10 pm
-Zephyrotica- Allegro's got a point. You should keep it under your hat. Gaia's banned people for less. neutral What you like is nobody's business but your own, and when you make it someone else's business, they have a right not to like it. no they're just being judgemental
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:11 pm
l-Kathulu-l Zealot Rapist I want to see Paul Blart RITE NAO BLEU. yay he came back. Hai Kathululululululululu
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:12 pm
Zealot Rapist l-Kathulu-l Zealot Rapist I want to see Paul Blart RITE NAO BLEU. yay he came back. Hai Kathululululululululu you has a segway. and u got post 178000 i has 178001 nao.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:13 pm
I just read what Allegro had to say about it, and think it would be hilarious to see loli literally shoved in someone's face. Just stab somebody in the eye with a little girl. As they struggle to escape they damage the area. Like one of the Pain's bullet bees, but a little girl.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:13 pm
I'm not trying to force it on others. I just don't see why I can't be me w/out getting lashed at.
And technically, the legal definition as to why CP is illegal is because it's "degrading to children." Since fictional material isn't of a real child, it's not degrading to said not real child, and therefor not CP.
But whatever, I can see how I'm being looked down on so I'm done with this conversation subject.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:13 pm
-Zephyrotica- Allegro's got a point. You should keep it under your hat. Gaia's banned people for less. neutral What you like is nobody's business but your own, and when you make it someone else's business, they have a right not to like it. Me= talking like a college professor. LPS= talking like a real person. Thank you. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|