|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:50 pm
Anonymoo..! I challenge you to an exhibition match. You and your famed fists, versus.. FPS_Doug. GK & Sgt. Peppers was already destroyed by him and his headshot, as proven here..
http://renewed-magick.net/RMUploads/Proof.mov
WILL YOU BE NEXT!? domokun
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:22 pm
Anonymooo Yeah, I was amazed-- Bleach has pretty damn good anime filler! xd  One row is from the SS story arc, the other is from the filler. Can YOU guess which is which?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:33 pm
Binatica Anonymooo Yeah, I was amazed-- Bleach has pretty damn good anime filler! xd  One row is from the SS story arc, the other is from the filler. Can YOU guess which is which? Nope.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:37 pm
[HighFive.] Binatica, some of the filler sucks a** in Bleach, but all in all, it's surprisingly not bad. Especially if we compare it to, let's say.. oh.. Naruto. King of Whorish Filler Arcs & dubbing.
That, and get FireFox/the ImageShack extension. Let's you right-click an online image and click "Upload to ImageShack", takes but a second instead of having to open a new window or tab, go to ImageShack, browse, upload... biggrin omo:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:40 pm
-Towely voice- Hey... I gotta' high five, I feel so good.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:49 pm
Typhoon_Omi Binatica, some of the filler sucks a** in Bleach, but all in all, it's surprisingly not bad. Especially if we compare it to, let's say.. oh.. Naruto. King of Whorish Filler Arcs & dubbing.  Are you retarded? Have you even watched the filler? The plot is absolutely retarded. At least Naruto filler manages to be funny now and then, but I don't watch either anymore. And I'm glad you noticed I don't even USE Imageshack, dumbass.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 3:11 pm
Binatica [img[slightly off eye OMFG![/img] Are you retarded? Have you even watched the filler? The plot is absolutely retarded. At least Naruto filler manages to be funny now and then, but I don't watch either anymore. And I'm glad you noticed I don't even USE Imageshack, dumbass. No. No, and no. God, why do I try to have civil conversations with you? domokun
1. I have, the plot's not good - but it's not "absolutely retarded", either.
2. Naruto's filler, save the movies [which I feel to be filler], sucks royal a** and disgraces both the manga and the anime, but in a few key moments.
3. Right. It's hardcore to leech images off sites that don't allow hotlinking instead of using ImageShack, I question whether you even know how to make an insult or not. You just kinda randomly throw them into your sentences.
Seriously. You're not tough s**t, quit trying to act like you are. domokun
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 3:34 pm
Typhoon_Omi [img[slightly off eye OMFG![/img] Learn anatomy. There's nothing salvagable about that face. Both eyes are off, the mouth is off, and the SHAPE OF THE SKULL ITSELF is off. Typhoon_Omi 2. Naruto's filler, save the movies [which I feel to be filler], sucks royal a** and disgraces both the manga and the anime, but in a few key moments. The Bleach filler is, IMO, worse. And, anyway, the Bleach filler hasn't been going nearly as long as the Naruto filler. Typhoon_Omi 3. Right. It's hardcore to leech images off sites that don't allow hotlinking instead of using ImageShack, I question whether you even know how to make an insult or not. You just kinda randomly throw them into your sentences. Actually, I "hotlinked" it from here: http://waffleimages.com/
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 3:41 pm
Binatica :earn anatomy. There's nothing salvagable about that face. Both eyes are off, the mouth is off, and the SHAPE OF THE SKULL ITSELF is off. His skull's ALWAYS OFF. Perhaps not that baddly, but still. domokun Quote: The Bleach filler is, IMO, worse. And, anyway, the Bleach filler hasn't been going nearly as long as the Naruto filler. Luckily. Otherwise, I'd be inclined to agree.Gotta love shoddy, third-party image hosts. domokun Phah. At least it tries to make it clear they're not affiliated with Something Awful. 'Cause.. they're not. Obviously.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:24 pm
Typhoon_Omi His skull's ALWAYS OFF. Perhaps not that baddly, but still. domokun So then you're agreeing with her, well that's settled. Typhoon_Omi Luckily. Otherwise, I'd be inclined to agree. You're saying the only reasons the Naruto fillers are worse because they've been going on longer?
Then you agree that the quality of the Naruto fillers is better, it's just a matter of quantity. Typhoon_Omi Gotta love shoddy, third-party image hosts. domokun Phah. At least it tries to make it clear they're not affiliated with Something Awful. 'Cause.. they're not. Obviously. What makes it shoddy? It offers both File and URL uploading, with limits to one megabyte and the three most common file types. Upon uploading, you're offered a simple looking page with the new URL in the img tags Gaia uses. I don't think simple design and functionality makes a website shoddy. I mean, these guys certainly do well with it. So they're obviously not affiliated with Something Awful and yet they make no attempt to claim as much!? HOLY ******** I THINK THIS DESERVES A SHITTY PHOTOSHOP OF PEOPLE'S AVATARS! @ Binatica: Excuse my intrusion on the argument.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 5:10 pm
Shouyin So then you're agreeing with her, well that's settled. Oh noes. It's Shouyin.Quote: You're saying the only reasons the Naruto fillers are worse because they've been going on longer?
Then you agree that the quality of the Naruto fillers is better, it's just a matter of quantity. More like, the farther on a filler deal goes, the more the half-assed plots have to "string together", making it more probable to fail.Quote: What makes it shoddy? It offers both File and URL uploading, with limits to one megabyte and the three most common file types. Upon uploading, you're offered a simple looking page with the new URL in the img tags Gaia uses. I don't think simple design and functionality makes a website shoddy. I mean, these guys certainly do well with it. Yes. Somebody else does the exact same thing, albeit, without the occasional downtimes. What'd they call it, ohhh..
Oh yeah! ImageShack! Strange.Quote: So they're obviously not affiliated with Something Awful and yet they make no attempt to claim as much!? Sarcasm. C'mon. You can DO IT, SHOUYIN! I'm very proud of you, so is your mommy; but you need to put those smarts to USE, BOI'! GO CHOP WOOD!Quote: HOLY ******** I THINK THIS DESERVES A SHITTY PHOTOSHOP OF PEOPLE'S AVATARS! AT LEAST I CAN ACTUALLY USE PHOTOSHOP AND MAKE DECENT RESULTS OMG CAPS R KEWLQuote: @ Omi: Excuse me. MY TRADEMARK IS STUPIDITY! [Drinks milk.] No problem. But, don't do it again. domokun
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 5:21 pm
Wow, Binatica/Gelmax is absurdly angry. xd
Okay, Gel, since you're apparently an amazing artist now, lemme tell you something that you should know about animation:
Bleach is an ongoing series, currently standing at 65+ episodes.
IF YOU EXPECT 100% PERFECTION FROM EVERY SINGLE EPISODE OF A SERIES LIKE THIS, I SWEAR TO GOD, CALM THE ******** DOWN.
Production values are expensive for an ongoing series, especially something like Bleach, which I'm glad Pierrot and Abe Noriyuki have decided to keep the series at a CONSISTENT--not amazing, CONSISTENT level of quality.
Just seeing that alone makes me glad. While Naruto has an amazing episode every now and then, and stays at a middling quality for the majority of the series, every now and then you'll get 2-3 eps in a row of pure crap. Comparing the animation quality of a shorter series like, say, Melancholy of Suzumiya Haruhi (14 episodes) or Black Lagoon (12 episodes) against an ongoing monster like Bleach is not only unreasonable, it's downright ridiculous.
Which studio is doing a series also comes into question. Suzumiya Haruhi was done by Kyoto Animation, who only tends to do one show at a time, and usually it's one BIG license that they're able to pour all their budget, time, and quality into.
Pierrot is a massive studio that licenses and handles multiple big-name properties--and with the exception of Shueisha cash cow One Piece, has handled every Shounen Jump title since the late '90s. Not everything can be perfect, whether it's in terms of filler writing (which we just have to ******** DEAL WITH) or minute animation discrepancies (which you can also ******** DEAL WITH).
All in all, in the history of fillers, Bleach has done an overwhelmingly impressive job, as it has retained its ratings and popularity, whereas the popularity of Naruto has taken a dip due to its uninteresting filler. One Piece has already shown that it will stay clearly at the top due to its continuously well-done filler, which allows it to stay a good distance behind its source material--but Bleach is doing an admirable job as well.
Love how people are suddenly art majors after watching anime. ******** love it. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 5:21 pm
Typhoon_Omi More like, the farther on a filler deal goes, the more the half-assed plots have to "string together", making it more probable to fail. Thank you for saying what I said but in different words. Typhoon_Omi Yes. Somebody else does the exact same thing, albeit, without the occasional downtimes. What'd they call it, ohhh..
Oh yeah! ImageShack! Strange. You used the word albeit incorrectly.
ImageShack has more adds, however yes, there is little difference between both sites. Thus making it a matter of personal preference, which cannot be faulted when both options provide the same services with the same functionality.
I didn't realize ImageShack had fanboys, that's unnerving. Typhoon_Omi Sarcasm. C'mon. You can DO IT, SHOUYIN! I'm very proud of you, so is your mommy; but you need to put those smarts to USE, BOI'! GO CHOP WOOD! You weren't being sarcastic, just retarded. Luckily you're rather adept at the latter, as just demonstrated.
Keep up up good work? Typhoon_Omi AT LEAST I CAN ACTUALLY USE PHOTOSHOP AND MAKE DECENT RESULTS OMG CAPS R KEWL lol Typhoon_Omi My entire retort was a giant pile of fail.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 5:24 pm
You're such a ******** nerd.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 5:26 pm
Shouyin Thank you for saying what I said but in different words. Thank you for repeating my comment, but in a different wording.
domokun Quote: You used the word albeit incorrectly.
ImageShack has more adds, however yes, there is little difference between both sites. Thus making it a matter of personal preference, which cannot be faulted when both options provide the same services with the same functionality.
I didn't realize ImageShack had fanboys, that's unnerving. Actually, at first, I merely suggested ImageShack; I'm not saying ImageShack "PWNS ALL OTHER IMAGEHOSTS LOL!!!" That said, they have a Terms of Service, a registration service, etc.
I'm not seeing that at this lovely imagehost Benatica's pointed out. So, in my preference: I'd obviously take ImageShack. I thought he'd hotlinked the image, since it showed some text saying the image cannot be displayed [the original] - but apparently? That was the image host he was using. So, hey, that's me. He's the one that started this "arguement".Quote: You weren't being sarcastic, just retarded. Luckily you're rather adept at the latter, as just demonstrated. LOL U RETARDED LOL THAT A KEWL INSULT
Yes, I was being sarcastic. My statement was a given, read the copyright at the bottom of that Imagehost - it says it is in no way affiliated with Something Awful TLC. STFU plz...And you say I'm retarded? At least I have basic mastery of the English language, sir. domokun Lmfao.I'll try my best.. but.. [Glances at you harshly.] I'll need to work hard. I can do it, I.. just need to be in the.. best shape of my life..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|