|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:31 pm
Nope, the tables are pretty heavy stuff.
It's got a switch on it for turning on all the lights. : D
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:05 am
and can it make blink the lights to the Imperial March?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 3:33 pm
Of course!
It also comes alive at night and scares little children!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 5:34 pm
Lady Blodwynn The plastic Nightspinner:  And the new plastic Fire Prism: Enjoy! wink Wow, uhh...I didnt think it was POSSIBLE for all my excitement on the new plastic models to be flushed down the toilet sooo easily... Im sorry, but the new Fire prism to me looks ugly as s**t!~ Im a person that loves things being more simplistic/easy. The old prsim model had a easy/functional use to it. That new one looks like a skimmer with a GIANT FAT guy on the back of it hanging over the view. Seriously, how does a Eldar drive it with taht freakn cannon in its face!?! Ugh... http://mittyzx.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/son_i_am_disappoint.gif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 7:54 pm
Nekage Lady Blodwynn The plastic Nightspinner: And the new plastic Fire Prism: Enjoy! wink Wow, uhh...I didnt think it was POSSIBLE for all my excitement on the new plastic models to be flushed down the toilet sooo easily... Im sorry, but the new Fire prism to me looks ugly as s**t!~ Im a person that loves things being more simplistic/easy. The old prsim model had a easy/functional use to it. That new one looks like a skimmer with a GIANT FAT guy on the back of it hanging over the view. Seriously, how does a Eldar drive it with taht freakn cannon in its face!?! Ugh... http://mittyzx.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/son_i_am_disappoint.gif Hm... Just trim the weapon down to a more manageable length, if possible. : 3 Call it a weapon variant made for fighting in cities or other places where rotating the turret with such a long weapon can cause issues. : 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:08 am
I assume "spectacularly long barrel" was t be indicative of weapons power... for radical conversion just cut the barrel at the end of the prism, and as for the vehicle silhouette they went with classic tank design - hull driver, turret weapon - for a skimmer which is quite silly, but hey, it is the realm of sponson tanks, so what did you expect...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:10 am
Van Evok I assume "spectacularly long barrel" was t be indicative of weapons power... for radical conversion just cut the barrel at the end of the prism, and as for the vehicle silhouette they went with classic tank design - hull driver, turret weapon - for a skimmer which is quite silly, but hey, it is the realm of sponson tanks, so what did you expect... It's not the fact that there's a turret, it's the fact that they made the turret almost 3 times the size of the classic turret, even without taking the new barrel size into account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:53 am
previous turret was a WW2 bomber top turret compared to this being a tank turret...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:56 pm
DarkElf27 Van Evok I assume "spectacularly long barrel" was t be indicative of weapons power... for radical conversion just cut the barrel at the end of the prism, and as for the vehicle silhouette they went with classic tank design - hull driver, turret weapon - for a skimmer which is quite silly, but hey, it is the realm of sponson tanks, so what did you expect... It's not the fact that there's a turret, it's the fact that they made the turret almost 3 times the size of the classic turret, even without taking the new barrel size into account. EXACTLY! And also its atop of that that the new turrent they made look more MODERN than the skimmer pilot area, so now they both look like they are from 2 totally different universes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 3:19 am
So you guys would rather have the Forge World version then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 6:28 am
The upcoming Fire Prism actually looks a lot like the Scorpion tank, only smaller. I'd say that's a good move, maybe even a hint of what might be coming out later.. wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 11:29 am
The next plastic super-heavy might be Eldar and it might be a Scorpion, or Cobra? gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 5:28 pm
Honestly, I probably would go with the Forgeworld one if I ever had the temptation to get one. They changed the chassis along the back, too, added a good 2 inches. I'm of the honest opinion that the Falcon design shouldn't be messed with, it ain't broke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 12:59 pm
I don't see anything wrong with the addition to the rear of the chassis. Maybe this is a teaser of the new Falcon kit? The added length and sleeker turret do make for a good model all in all. It also does a better job of making it fit in a bit better with this sleek monstrosity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 2:38 pm
Lady Blodwynn I don't see anything wrong with the addition to the rear of the chassis. Maybe this is a teaser of the new Falcon kit? Well, I just personally don't think that there's any reason to mess with one of the most visually appealing vehicles GW's got, I don't see why the Falcon kit needs any sort of update.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
