|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 3:37 pm
/me stabs someone.
My computer is too slow for flash animations. It may be loading awesome, but it's loading too slowly, too.
Omi: Awesome! That's the type of awesome I like x.x
Guh.
/me stabs computer numerous times.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 3:51 pm
And with five subtle movements of his fingers, the enemy's face tore itself off, using it's eyelids and ears as makeshift hands, and flew into Ken's outstreched hand.
His opposition's skull was clearly showing, with bits of blood rolling down it, and his eyes starting to roll out of his sockets. No facial features could be distinguished anymore, as there was no face.
Ken smiled, before taking three steps over and plunging his left hand, with the face, into the enemy's stomach. Squishing around inside, he finally pulled the heart out, whole, and replaced it with the face. Ken's right hand was simultaneously tearing out each of the person's eyes, alhough leaving them attached to the brain. He placed the eyes in his cheeks and stuffed the person's heart in his mouth, which allowed the opposition to physically watch his heart be consumed inside of Ken's mouth before he died.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 3:53 pm
Hmm, if someone could explain how the first line of my above post worked...Like, in a semi-realistic way, then I'll likely give them a hug or something.
I honestly can't comprehend how ears and eyelids can be used as hands...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:24 pm
KeNsHiNo5o Hmm, if someone could explain how the first line of my above post worked...Like, in a semi-realistic way, then I'll likely give them a hug or something. I honestly can't comprehend how ears and eyelids can be used as hands... Nor can I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:30 pm
Quote: Recently, over half the moderators petitioned for Gelmax to be perma banned for cumulative agression toward them and the administration. For the first time ever, the admins approved such a ban. as is standard, his perma ban also acompanied the ban of all his mule accounts. While the moderators did not have any specific TOS violation to take Gelmax down, his "near trolling" was classified as a cumulative effect and combined by the general lack of support he had at the time (having lost several allies in administration over the previous 12 months). this represents a change in policy, a policy not publically acknowledged. It means that members of Gaia acquire penalties which gradually increase, not unlike the two strike system for moderators. oddly, the moderators themselves are not subject to the cumulative TOS violation effects for flaming and trolling, as, anyone could tell you, far more than half of the moderators today did not get there without making several enemies along the way. As for Ertai losing his account for two weeks, that's a reflection of being tried for a crime he committed about a month ago, however, the existing moderator involved was too lazy to do anything about it until after the Trial of Gelmax was concluded. What this trend represents? a movement toward penalties dating back to our origins, and a complete lack of sympathy for the development of individuals. The enemies people make today, will someday be in power, and only those in power may call upon to convict those who had crimes in the past. So, if you have no enemies, your sins may be forgotten (for we are all criminals at least once, in the eyes of the TOS), but if you have enemies, and you come to a position of power, even the crimes you commit today will be forgotten, while the crimes of your enemies, days, months, or even years in the past, may be braught to the forefront, and used to exact revenge. There has been discussion about a possible group designated to monitor moderator corruption, as the person in charge of this duty has changed job descrptions and the amount of corruption has multiplied. Time will only tell, if this post suddenly disappears, know that it was removed by those in power who did not want you to know. Know also, that there are many things which could be said, but will not. If this guild perishes suddenly, know, good people, that it perished not for Sin, but for Truth. WTF? This was pulled from a guild I am in...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:33 pm
I'm making my newest, most gripping story yet.
"Fight like a GIRL Club!"Preview Shilon: Weehh heh heh.. awake, are you? " Nightbringer awoke to find himself in a dark, dimly lit room with iron-barred windows, and a number of men standing around him. His left eye was bruised.." Nightbringer: EEEEEEK! DON'T RAPE ME, I'M NUBLE AND YOUNG! Shilon: ..N... No.. no, we're not.. we're not homosexual, or rapists. "Tri-a**": Speak fo yo'self, NIGGOHR! [Flops over to NB, and grabs him by the left tendril.] " Three Weeks Later.." Nightbringer: AUWH HAUW HAUW HAAAAHH..! [Tis hurled back into the room, twitching horribly.] Shilon: ..Okay. Being raped for twenty-one days by a 700 pound man.. MAY put you out of perfect conditioning for a fight. But I can see it in you! You can DO IT! You ready to fight!? Nightbringer: [Stands up slowly, sniffling, before throwing his arms up in an offensive stance.] Thank you. You've.. given me purpose. Through fighting.. I can find true meaning to my life.. let us begin.. Shilon: [Runs forward, eyes narrowing.] GYAAAAAHHHH! [-and.. starts girly-smacking NB across the face. Then, tries to push NB away.] Nightbringer: GAHEEHHH! [Kicks Shilon in the nuts.] Shilon: HEEEYYYY! NO BELOW THE BELT~ [Twirls around, and starts girly smacking Nightbringer, only to be smacked in return.] "Tri-a**": Speak fo'yoself, NIGGOHRRR! [Grabs a random man nearby, and drags him back into the darkness.] " Suddenly, Omi appeared at the bottom of the stairs.." Omi: Yo. I heard this here's a hardcore FIGHTIN' CLUB- Nightbringer: AH HEE HEEEEEE! MY PINKY! ;.; [Girly right-hook-smacks Shilon across the face.] Crowd: [Gasps.] Guy: [Puts his right hand up.] Oh no he DIDN'T! Omi: .... Or not. Wankies. domokun [Walks back upstairs.]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:36 pm
Son Hakkai WTF? This was pulled from a guild I am in...
Lanzer and the other "administrators" focus entirely on the feature aspects of Gaia, and leave the moderators to actually managing Gaia. Unfortunately, most of these staff members kissed a**, royally, to get where they are - and personally, are poorly suited for running even a small community, much less one as massive as Gaia Online.
Just me, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:40 pm
r4wr, Gel = banned?
Aw, our troll ;.;
Omi: Nice story...thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:42 pm
Quote: Recently, over half the moderators petitioned for Gelmax to be perma banned for cumulative agression toward them and the administration. For the first time ever, the admins approved such a ban. as is standard, his perma ban also acompanied the ban of all his mule accounts. While the moderators did not have any specific TOS violation to take Gelmax down, his "near trolling" was classified as a cumulative effect and combined by the general lack of support he had at the time (having lost several allies in administration over the previous 12 months). this represents a change in policy, a policy not publically acknowledged. It means that members of Gaia acquire penalties which gradually increase, not unlike the two strike system for moderators. oddly, the moderators themselves are not subject to the cumulative TOS violation effects for flaming and trolling, as, anyone could tell you, far more than half of the moderators today did not get there without making several enemies along the way. As for Ertai losing his account for two weeks, that's a reflection of being tried for a crime he committed about a month ago, however, the existing moderator involved was too lazy to do anything about it until after the Trial of Gelmax was concluded. What this trend represents? a movement toward penalties dating back to our origins, and a complete lack of sympathy for the development of individuals. The enemies people make today, will someday be in power, and only those in power may call upon to convict those who had crimes in the past. So, if you have no enemies, your sins may be forgotten (for we are all criminals at least once, in the eyes of the TOS), but if you have enemies, and you come to a position of power, even the crimes you commit today will be forgotten, while the crimes of your enemies, days, months, or even years in the past, may be braught to the forefront, and used to exact revenge. There has been discussion about a possible group designated to monitor moderator corruption, as the person in charge of this duty has changed job descrptions and the amount of corruption has multiplied. Time will only tell, if this post suddenly disappears, know that it was removed by those in power who did not want you to know. Know also, that there are many things which could be said, but will not. If this guild perishes suddenly, know, good people, that it perished not for Sin, but for Truth. Oooh, scandalous! Prepares microft word for immediate data entry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Heh, yeah.
Gaia's lower levels are corrupt, and have/will always be like that.
Just like everything else in this world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:01 pm
KeNsHiNo5o r4wr, Gel = banned? Aw, our troll ;.; Omi: Nice story...thing. That article is left out of context with the omission of the date posted.
It's old news, Gelmax came back as Binatica.
Perma-banning is for chumps.
Good ol' Anthon Noire though, telling it like it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:08 pm
Shouyin That article is left out of context with the omission of the date posted.
It's old news, Gelmax came back as Binatica.
Perma-banning is for chumps.
Good ol' Anthon Noire though, telling it like it is. Oh, really? Hah, Gaia perma bans are useless then, I guess?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:13 pm
*shrugs* I'm sure the deletion of your original account and all your mules can be discouraging, but only if you value the usernames/gold/post count/items in some way. Not to say Gelmax didn't and/or doesn't, but it obviously wasn't enough to keep her from just making a new account and coming back.
Or well, I shouldn't assume, hardly know the true circumstances myself.
Probably would've been better to like, ban Gel's IP or something.
But I'm pretty sure you can change it with a flick on and off of your modem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:37 pm
Just a question:
Why don't the people who find gaia so problemated (I don't know if that a word, but it sounded good) attempt to be moderaters? And defeat the ladder of corruption.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
