|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:59 pm
*offers to start padding the walls*
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:08 pm
*slips a few spikes into the padding for random bloodletting*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:04 pm
some people say that it is the things you say and do that make you YOU
others argue it is the things that you don't say, and don't do that make you YOU
I disagree!
my theory: it is the things you almost say and nearly don't do that make you who you are
burn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:54 pm
neutral I am curious about the psychological basis that brought you to this theory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:43 pm
oh, I just happened to be in a particularly disagreeable mood...
"Rainey was pissed. And thus, genius was born."
- my BFF
And also, it seems to make sense. For example, in books, movies, etc. isn't it always more powerful when the character doesn't cry? When you can tell they want to, but they don't allow themselves to do so? I think it certainly says quite a bit more about an individual - the times they manage to hold themselves together as opposed to falling apart. Same goes for laughter. Or anything, really...the things we hold back despite really, really wanting to let them out say a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 7:52 pm
crying crying crying crying crying crying crying crying crying crying
mah puter dieded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:59 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:05 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:59 pm
cool puter back up . . . for now. Now to repersonalize it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:22 pm
 - - - - - - Mou - - - - - -
There is a freaky guy standing behind you Ruined ;___;
- - - - - - Mou - - - - - -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:00 pm
True, but Stephen is well worth the oddity of having him there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:10 pm
*Randomly inserted flaming assassination of DOOOM!*
And the problem has been solved.
*poof*
(Is gone)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:10 pm
Nope. Colbert is too awesome for your pseudo-assassinations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
