|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:08 pm
SoThatAznGirl Maybe there's a link between Amber, Ton, and Hash. All of them have not voted, excluding Amber-Dragn. And not much progress has been attempted by them, either.
I mean, Ton's begun to question players. And Hash theorizes, but then disappears. But the common factor still seems suspicious to me. *bows down*
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:12 pm
Sweet Amber Lynne Going back on some of the post i think Dragn99 looks the most suspicious, he was this way and that way about voting and then last minute he finally voted? was this so that people didn't think he was mafia or to hide that he is mafia. Its easy to just say i agree with what people are saying so im gonna vote "this person" to. People just think hes actually agreeing but really hes thinking if i dont vote for "this person" and i vote for someone else ill look suspicions. Like what was stated before he had enough time to vote before the others why did it take so long to decide to actually finally vote. Vote Dragn99This vote could change if he gives a good enough reason for it, but there seems to be a lot of people very unsure of him at the moment. Ahh, so that's why you guys think Dragn is TB. Hmm...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:14 pm
POST ON 111
*Crawls back in grave*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:16 pm
Tonberry Crunch POST ON 111
*Crawls back in grave*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:17 pm
badtzmaru SoThatAznGirl Maybe there's a link between Amber, Ton, and Hash. All of them have not voted, excluding Amber-Dragn. And not much progress has been attempted by them, either.
I mean, Ton's begun to question players. And Hash theorizes, but then disappears. But the common factor still seems suspicious to me. *bows down*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:19 pm
Alright, I'm here. Sifting through stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:25 pm
Day is over.
You, being a bunch of dicks, decide to lynch Hash before he has a chance to defend himself. Nice going. Lucky for you, he was a Naut.
The X-nauts have been eliminated.
Unfortunately, you still lose kath in the night. Bye bye General Guy.
6 left. 4 to convict, 3 for night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:26 pm
YES!!!! *dances around*
Edit: I only read Xnauts eliminated!! KAATTTHHHH!!!! heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:26 pm
X-Nauts are gone!
We lost Kath too, though. crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:29 pm
Allegro Day is over.You, being a bunch of dicks, decide to lynch Hash before he has a chance to defend himself. Nice going. Lucky for you, he was a Naut.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:29 pm
exclaim
No wonder Kath kept asking about the vigi... crying Sorry for doubting you, Kath...
Yay, about Hash... But, what was Rawk thinking?! o_O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:29 pm
AllegrOwwin, question: What happens if we end up being down to several Townies and Weegee? With the Vig gone, we can't get rid of Weegee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:30 pm
So, Hash died. Which means Rawk lied?
And Vigi is gone? No more need to worry about random kills? But did Kath even USE his kill?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:30 pm
I wonder if Hash or TB targeted Kath.
Do you guys think it's safe to roleclaim now?
We can try to figure out who is lying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
