|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 4:58 pm
clueless-in-the-forest chloe, sorry to say....i think that day is in the near future ninja i'm going to be jumping for joy, and some of us are going to be bald rofl OR y'all will be laughing at me, while i sulk in a corner stare I wouldn't laugh at you Clue. I know that it is very painful when you see your favorite couple doesn't work out. emo
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:37 pm
meh i give you permission to say "ha" if that happens sweatdrop xP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:38 pm
I really REALLY can't see it happening still.... People need to learn to move on from it....it has gotten REALLY old.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:41 pm
I do agree but people out there still have their hope. Which I think they shouldn't have because they keep leading the fans on and stuff and that is wrong. But whatever. IF they get back together, I know we all will still watch anyways so either way they win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:59 pm
Exactly. The writers' pathological need to keep the hopes of each fan faction up - up, but never fulfilled - is one of the things that's holding them back and stopping them from doing anything really adventurous and interesting, but it keeps the ratings steady so they'll keep it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:22 pm
`Chloe Sullivan` I really REALLY can't see it happening still.... People need to learn to move on from it....it has gotten REALLY old. Just as you need to move on from your chlois theory..In which many of your points were proven faulty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:23 am
zach61092 `Chloe Sullivan` I really REALLY can't see it happening still.... People need to learn to move on from it....it has gotten REALLY old. Just as you need to move on from your chlois theory..In which many of your points were proven faulty. THAT was something very very stupid to say. Youz gonnnz getz flamedzzzz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:19 pm
[Alexx] zach61092 `Chloe Sullivan` I really REALLY can't see it happening still.... People need to learn to move on from it....it has gotten REALLY old. Just as you need to move on from your chlois theory..In which many of your points were proven faulty. THAT was something very very stupid to say. Youz gonnnz getz flamedzzzz. I say stupid things alot..and it is only right that I get to criticize the chlois theory as Chloe does to Clana.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:01 am
i know im in here as much as i shouid considering i created this topic. but i have finals and i cant get on as much as i used to. so, im sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 2:10 pm
Shujin Ryu i know im in here as much as i shouid considering i created this topic. but i have finals and i cant get on as much as i used to. so, im sorry. We do have a thread designated for people leaving. Ironically, it is titled "Leaving?" But yeah... by the time you see this there will be no use for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:45 am
SaberFireTiger Shujin Ryu i know im in here as much as i shouid considering i created this topic. but i have finals and i cant get on as much as i used to. so, im sorry. We do have a thread designated for people leaving. Ironically, it is titled "Leaving?" But yeah... by the time you see this there will be no use for it. well, im not leaving. im just saying that i wont be in here as much because i have finals right now. i will be back to normal soon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:29 pm
SaberFireTiger I do agree but people out there still have their hope. Which I think they shouldn't have because they keep leading the fans on and stuff and that is wrong. But whatever. IF they get back together, I know we all will still watch anyways so either way they win.
But the creators should realize how REPETITIVE they would be if they did. Trying to make something about forgotten and old relationships is pointless and is really not healthy for a show getting into its last years. This is when they need the viewers the most, other then when the show first starts. As much as I love Smallville, which you all know is A LOT I'm not sure I could find it in my time to sit through an hour long show just re-watching the same old Clana relationship being ripped apart at the seams. we all know it doesn't work, and we all know they will break up, why is it that some people can't just grasp the concept that they HAVE broken up and there is really no need or any necessity for them to get back together. The show did PERFECTLY fine without the meaningless Clana relationship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:35 pm
`Chloe Sullivan` SaberFireTiger I do agree but people out there still have their hope. Which I think they shouldn't have because they keep leading the fans on and stuff and that is wrong. But whatever. IF they get back together, I know we all will still watch anyways so either way they win.
But the creators should realize how REPETITIVE they would be if they did. Trying to make something about forgotten and old relationships is pointless and is really not healthy for a show getting into its last years. This is when they need the viewers the most, other then when the show first starts. As much as I love Smallville, which you all know is A LOT I'm not sure I could find it in my time to sit through an hour long show just re-watching the same old Clana relationship being ripped apart at the seams. we all know it doesn't work, and we all know they will break up, why is it that some people can't just grasp the concept that they HAVE broken up and there is really no need or any necessity for them to get back together. The show did PERFECTLY fine without the meaningless Clana relationship. The relationship would be different if Lana knows Clarks secret..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 5:07 pm
But it would not clear up EVERYTHING. Just simply telling Lana his secret would not instantly clear up any doubt she had about him before. Then she would Dwell on how he "kept big secrets" from her and she would be in a constant state of paranoia always wondering if he was keeping anything else from her. There is always going to be the misunderstanding as well, as to why Clark could trust Chloe with his secret and not her. Even if that wasn't his decision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 5:58 pm
`Chloe Sullivan` But it would not clear up EVERYTHING. Just simply telling Lana his secret would not instantly clear up any doubt she had about him before. Then she would Dwell on how he "kept big secrets" from her and she would be in a constant state of paranoia always wondering if he was keeping anything else from her. There is always going to be the misunderstanding as well, as to why Clark could trust Chloe with his secret and not her. Even if that wasn't his decision. Which is what should have happened in Reckoning, for the record, and didn't, and is one of the reasons that Reckoning was so poorly executed if you ask me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[Alexx]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/56/c8/399d842b16c856_flip.png?t=1723001441_6_01)
