|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:40 pm
Okay guys, rulez tiem.
A Deff Dread's profile lists its Attacks as 3. It is also equipped with two Dreadnought Close-combat Weapons standard. Da millyon-toof qweschin: Does the Dread get three attacks or four? This is, of course, assuming that the other two slots are not equipped with DCCWs.
Normally, in a situation like this, the unit's profile would say "the extra attack has been included in the profile" next to the wargear in question - however, this is not the case with the Deff Dread. Therefore, a Deff Dread with two DCCWs should have 4 attacks.
Is this correct? Y/N
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:41 am
This is covered in the FAQ... Why not read the FAQ before asking in forums?
Anyways, no the attacks are already included in the profile, since a dread with 3 weapons gets 4 attacks, and one with 4 weapons get 5 attacks (like stated in the FAQ).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:42 am
Jason Da Psycho Then Imma get Zogwart to squig you..... *Squigifys Ghazagul* Muwhahaha O... Kay? What's the purpose of this? D:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:06 pm
Shinobi_8745 This is covered in the FAQ... Why not read the FAQ before asking in forums? Anyways, no the attacks are already included in the profile, since a dread with 3 weapons gets 4 attacks, and one with 4 weapons get 5 attacks (like stated in the FAQ). Er... I did. Guess I didn't look hard enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 3:38 pm
Hey guys, i got a pic of Captain Badruk, I gotta upload it to computer now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 5:52 pm
So guys, look what I just picked up for nine bucks at Hobbytown... Doesn't it just scream "Battlewagon"?I've got enough leftover bitz from my Boyz to convert four Big Shootaz. It'll be open-topped with a Killcannon made from pipe bits, and I'll eventually stick the tank trap from the 40k Battlefield Accessories kit on the front as a Reinforced Ram. That said, I could still use some ideas on Orkin' it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 2:35 am
Plasticard, Give dat bad boy some 'eavy Arma. And grotz. Dere's gotta be runtz clamboring all over dat fing. Extra gubbins like dicarded shootas and choppas brings it all home.
And for Mork's sake make sure your killcannon resembles a LR Conqueror Cannon. It's the only other conventional ST7 ordnance weapon i've ever heard of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 5:10 am
I don't see why he shouldn't use another kind of cannon, the reason the ork cannon is low at Strength is that they use another kind of ammo, or that the "looted" weapon is a bad shape (Looted Russ someone?).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:46 am
I've actually got a little restricting connector I got from Lowe's that I intend to use as some sort of heavy weapon, either a killkannon here or a looted wagon's boomgun later, but I'm still trying to figure out where to put it.
Guess it's time to learn how to play with plasticard, then!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:50 am
Why not make it swappable? Or wait for the comming Wagon which do incluce a killkannon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 6:02 pm
IMO, the old wagons looked better. The new ones are just....tacky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:06 pm
Shinobi_8745 Why not make it swappable? Or wait for the comming Wagon which do incluce a killkannon. Because the new Battlewagon will cost fifty Ameribuxx. The pictured Amtrack was less than nine. I still intend to get one sometime, but for now it may be cheaper to make my own. Swappable is good, though. I just need to find a cheap supply of rokkits. Edit: Do you think I should convert my Lil Guns as boyz holding them or just bolt-on?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:18 pm
Well, this is an Ork thread, so here. This is why green is best. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:45 pm
Still it belongs to the funny picture thread in the GD forum. wink
But it's all true~<3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 1:52 am
Serebrate IMO, the old wagons looked better. The new ones are just....tacky. The old wagons looked like just that: Wagons. Like the little red kind I pulled my stuff around as a kid. It was a box. With hard wheels. It was what a tonka truck would look like if it fell out of the ugly tree, hit every branch on the way down, landed in a puddle of yo-momma's-face, then had the ugly tree fall over on it, and then the ugly asteroid smash into it all for good measure. The new one looks like satan's tourbus. Menacing, lethal, FAST. Pure a**-kickery. How can you not like it? *EDIT* Damn, looking back, I realise I cannot spell when I drink scotch. Either that or I cannot proofread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
