|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:37 pm
Eve Ill Zeeb Ra Scila Verna Kreacher is like some sort of secret wrestler. I miss Colin already. I always found Colin irritating. crying I'm going to miss Tonks though. gonk I pretty much love all the really annoying characters. Ardd -- It would be weird and gimmicky I guess is the word if she wrote about the kids. confused Besides, what would she write about? Voldemort is gone. Speaking of that, it's weird, anymore. It's like things are a little more carefree now that Voldemort is 'gone.' Not often does an outstanding villain get completely defeated.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:42 pm
Well, it is hard to say what she'd write about. I'm sure it would be a good idea if she decided to resurrect the series for it, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:45 pm
arddunaid EDIT: Yeah, Neville kicked a**. He's probably one of my favorite characters in the series, just because he starts out as a dweeb and ends up as the cool hero. In fact, I really enjoyed how Rowling made a lot of the characters into heroes, Ron and Hermione destroying horcruxes, Mrs. Weasley becoming a ninja, etc. The part with Mrs. Weasley killing Beatrix was one part I didn't like. Harry should have Avada'd her, just to complete his use of Unforgivable Curses. For being the good guy, he seemed rather fond of them. And although I never saw any parts as being fanficcy, I do wonder if seeing her novels as movies changed her writing style at all. Some of the stuff just seemed designed for a movie rather than a book. But still cool."Ooh, you look much tastier than Crabbe and Goyle, Harry," said Hermione.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:46 pm
Galvorte The part with Mrs. Weasley killing Beatrix was one part I didn't like. Harry should have Avada'd her, just to complete his use of Unforgivable Curses. For being the good guy, he seemed rather fond of them. McGonagall used some too. ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:49 pm
Yeah, that was weird to me, too. But it was vaguely realistic. I mean, seriously, sometimes stupefy just won't cut it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:52 pm
I like the time when he imperio'd like five people and Hermione and Ron were like WE'RE DOWN WITH THAT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:04 pm
Scila Verna I like the time when he imperio'd like five people and Hermione and Ron were like WE'RE DOWN WITH THAT. And then when he crucio'd a Death Eater in front of McGonagall, and she's like "Harry!" and he's like "Well, he spit on you!" And she's like "I'm proud of you, Harry!" When did she use them, though?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:05 pm
Galvorte Scila Verna I like the time when he imperio'd like five people and Hermione and Ron were like WE'RE DOWN WITH THAT. And then when he crucio'd a Death Eater in front of McGonagall, and she's like "Harry!" and he's like "Well, he spit on you!" And she's like "I'm proud of you, Harry!" When did she use them, though? Right after that, she used imperio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:26 pm
arddunaid Yeah, that was weird to me, too. But it was vaguely realistic. I mean, seriously, sometimes stupefy just won't cut it. Well, there's always Sectumsempra. I thought the Unforgivable Curses were supposed to be, well, unforgivable. Whatever happened to 'use these once and you go to Azkaban for life"? Another thing. Why did they learn about nonverbal spells in the last book? They weren't mentioned a single time in this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:32 pm
Galvorte Another thing. Why did they learn about nonverbal spells in the last book? They weren't mentioned a single time in this one. They aren't sexy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:52 pm
Eve Ill Zeeb Ra Galvorte Another thing. Why did they learn about nonverbal spells in the last book? They weren't mentioned a single time in this one. They aren't sexy? Chekov's Gun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:53 pm
Galvorte Eve Ill Zeeb Ra Galvorte Another thing. Why did they learn about nonverbal spells in the last book? They weren't mentioned a single time in this one. They aren't sexy? Chekov's Gun. Chekov doesn't need a gun. He has a phaser, and boyish good looks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:57 pm
Eve Ill Zeeb Ra Galvorte Eve Ill Zeeb Ra Galvorte Another thing. Why did they learn about nonverbal spells in the last book? They weren't mentioned a single time in this one. They aren't sexy? Chekov's Gun. Chekov doesn't need a gun. He has a phaser, and boyish good looks. True. Spock had a more attractive brain, though. So attractive that aliens tried to steal it, if I recall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:01 pm
Galvorte True. Spock had a more attractive brain, though. So attractive that aliens tried to steal it, if I recall. I don't recall if they did or didn't, but if Spock's brain was a girl, I'd totally marry it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:30 pm
Eve Ill Zeeb Ra Galvorte True. Spock had a more attractive brain, though. So attractive that aliens tried to steal it, if I recall. I don't recall if they did or didn't, but if Spock's brain was a girl, I'd totally marry it. I don't even care about if it's a girl or not . . . wait, I want to have children, so yes I do. Are we off topic?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
