|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:32 pm
xD;; I know, I used to just ignore grammar and punctuation and everything...It wasn't worth it to try and figure out 'you're, your' 'their, there, they're' and 'then, than'....>>; so I just didn't try. But then once I got them, I was like 'YAY! I KNOW GRAMMAR KNOW!!!! <3'
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 2:39 am
^^;; I have no issues with how others use grammar. As long as it's understandable it's fine, then again that's because I dislike restraints on creativity.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:19 am
I don't like restrictions either, I just....find it hard to understand people when they don't use certain parts of grammar, cuz I have to sit there and figure out what they're trying to say, and it takes my enjoyment out of reading what they're saying.
Like, my reading book from 7th or 8th grade had this sentence that went something like: "....and all the uniforms they had had, had all been ruined..." or something like that, and I spent a good six minutes trying to figure out what they meant... sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 5:31 pm
OH..... That.... THAT IS ONE HORRIBLE SENTENCE!!!!! gonk crying
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:55 pm
XD I think it's an amusing sentience~
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:37 pm
It's amusing sentence but it's also horrible from a grammar point of view
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:38 pm
I don't care if its grammars horrible or the fact that it could have easily been written a different way. Like 'and all their uniforms had been ruined' instead of 'and all the uniforms they had had, had all been ruined'. I still like it xD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 3:04 pm
I just can't believe they put something with that bad of grammar in an actual textbook.... sweatdrop Aren't they supposed to set an example?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 7:02 pm
Well everyone makes mistakes x3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:36 pm
I don't like reading the word, "persons".... It should be PEOPLE if you want to use the damn word person as a ******** plural! scream
sweatdrop Sorry...!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 1:31 pm
The only time I can stand 'persons' is when they have it as a possessive form.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:56 pm
*nods in agreement* Yes but I've read it where it's used without the possessive form and it pisses me off. stressed sweatdrop
I think I have problems... xD;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:42 am
I don't see why words written a certain way should piss you off^^;;;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 11:50 am
Well, sometimes stuff just doesn't make sense....>>; Like that sentence I just told you guys.....^o^
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:39 pm
Yeah, why should it matter what makes me angry or not...? >w>;;;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|