|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:32 pm
PhaedraMcSpiffy The ADT is crazy today. Looks like somebody doesn't even UNDERSTAND bodily domain: Quote: Do you realize how much you allow to violate your bodily domain, in a single day? Quote: You talk about Bodily Domain. Did it not occur to you that you willingly allow, daily, violations against your domain? Sad, but anyway, this thread is about "pro-life" misogyny and hate. So here's some: Quote: You do have a choice, you can choose to have sex and take the risk of pregnancy, or you can choose to not have sex. Yeah. The person posted that in response to one of my posts. I'm like "how can you ALLOW someone to violate your BD? If you allow it, there isn't a violation!!" And, of course, the poor thing didn't get it. Then there was some crap about the law and citizenship. Glamarama- ugh, I know. People b***h at me a lot because they were "being sarcastic." INTERNET = I CAN'T HEAR THE TONE OF YOUR VOICE, STOOPID! *headdesk*
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:02 am
You can convey sarcasm, but it becomes kind of silly-looking. For instance:
"Oh, yeah, SURE it is!"
"Yeah, sure is is."
"Yeah, sure it is. rolleyes "
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:12 am
PhaedraMcSpiffy You can convey sarcasm, but it becomes kind of silly-looking. For instance: "Oh, yeah, SURE it is!" "Yeah, sure is is." "Yeah, sure it is. rolleyes " I usually use the rolleyes , or I make what I'm saying so outrageous that anyone with a working brain knows that I'm being sarcastic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:32 pm
Some have said that it was wrong to accuse the lifers in the ADT of misogyny. Quote: I beleive 100% in a woman's right to choose. I beleive a woman should be able to choose to keep her legs closed, or spread them apart.How the ******** do you tell me that's not misogyny?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:40 am
Quote: Also, about costs- If they feel too ashamed to tell anyone that they need help and money, they shouldn't have gotten pregnant to begin with. Quote: ☆~ Three radical solutions:
1. DON'T HAVE SEX
2. CHOP IT OFF
3. MASTURBATE
Thank you for your time.~☆
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:57 pm
See, they don't live in realityland with the rest of us. "Should have" means NOTHING. You have to do something now! It's done. You can't go back and change it. You have to deal with what's happened.
"Be abstinent if you don't want kids!" Well, s**t! It doesn't quite work that way, now does it? People have sex. You can tell them not to until you're blue in the face and a cow is pissing on your shoes.
People make mistakes. People act on impulse. People do stupid s**t. Telling them not to is not helpful!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:38 pm
Forcing them not to also does not work, and is horrendously cruel and totalitarian.
Same goes for abandoning and hating them after they don't listen to your undrealistic demands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:53 am
PhaedraMcSpiffy Some have said that it was wrong to accuse the lifers in the ADT of misogyny. Quote: I beleive 100% in a woman's right to choose. I beleive a woman should be able to choose to keep her legs closed, or spread them apart.How the ******** do you tell me that's not misogyny? I saw that quote. Good thing you can't punch people over the internet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:00 pm
Freedom Fire PhaedraMcSpiffy Some have said that it was wrong to accuse the lifers in the ADT of misogyny. Quote: I beleive 100% in a woman's right to choose. I beleive a woman should be able to choose to keep her legs closed, or spread them apart.How the ******** do you tell me that's not misogyny? I saw that quote. Good thing you can't punch people over the internet. no it isn't- that's one of the inventions i'm woking on in my spare time! gonk i haven't even been in the forums aside from the exchange lately, but i think i've seen my fair share of pro-life retardedness for the next couple weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:23 am
I've seen enough cruelty and outright hatred for women from these people to last a lifetime. Quote: If she didn't want the baby in the first place then she had the choice to use birth control. Her negligence twoards said anti birth control resulted in a pregnancy. Now she can choose to kill an innocent being that was forming within her or be burdened with it for the rest of her life, even if she doesn't want it. Look, it is a womans choice to become a murderer, a single parent, or a smart person. Don't force the husband into said burden. Because believe me, if men could take a pill to stop getting women pregnant, we would definitely do it. Quoting the above post, someone said: Quote: No, she must keep the child. It's her fault for not using birth control anyway, so now she must take the punishment. Here comes the hypocrite of the year award: Quote: If she did what she did, knowing full well there was a chance to get pregnant then she shouldn't be allowed to abort. If she did then she should get life for killing a child.... If a woman becomes pregnant from rape or incest, is it her fault then? Should she be punished by having to devote at least 7-9 months to a child she never "risked" having?Should the RAPE VICTIM be forced to become and remain pregnant despite the potential health problems and financial troubles, not to mention severe psychological distress from being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy?Even when the rape isn't so crystal clear to some, as with the case of spouse rape, peer pressure, or coercion after intoxication, should the VICTIM be punished for simply being there?You're absolutely ridiculous... that's like saying that because you smoke cigarettes, you're responsible for attempted murder or you're suicidal. Fathers don't risk their health and lives when pregnancy occurs. Women do.It's like saying that because you have the organ donor license that at any time when you're in perfect health, you can be called in and required to donate something that might risk your health.Why do women have to take sole responsibility for a pregnancy? If you donate half of the genetic material, you are 50% responsible for the resulting progeny. That at least is fair and equal. The bold and underlined part shows the biggest hypocrisy. The underlined part is just ******** up. Rape is rape. This one's not misogynist, but it takes the ********' cake as far as stupidity goes: Quote: Quote: An embryo or a fetus is not a baby and a fetus and an embryo do not have independent legal personality. This isn't "make your own definition for a child" debate. *sigh* All of the above posts come from Macai's Why Are All Women So Sexist? thread (yes, it's meant to be ironic). It needs some more feminists and pro-choicers right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:58 am
Jesus Christ... that dude is INSANE!
I looked briefly at his topic and concluded that he is a troll. He's trolling for responses- I mean, look at his poll "and crybaby liberals". wow, what LOADED words!
Hate is filth spewed from his drivel.
Anyway, despite the many glares I'm likely to get, women CAN'T BE SEXIST in the same way that blacks *can't* be racist neutral
- why? Because they do not have the power in place to support that, unlike white males. Society and culture itself is already very loaded, created by white males, for white males and it is a lot easier for white males to benefit from it without doing *anything* of merit to show for it. Hypothetically, if America was crafted by black slaves, it would be a very, very different society.
Seeing ignorant, hateful young guys like Macai only reinforce my need to be more protective of myself and my interests as a female, of childbearing age. It's a scary combination, the fundamentalist bible path + conservatism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:25 pm
Grip of Death Anyway, despite the many glares I'm likely to get, women CAN'T BE SEXIST in the same way that blacks *can't* be racist neutral - why? Because they do not have the power in place to support that, unlike white males. Society and culture itself is already very loaded, created by white males, for white males and it is a lot easier for white males to benefit from it without doing *anything* of merit to show for it. Hypothetically, if America was crafted by black slaves, it would be a very, very different society. Umm... Women can be sexist and blacks can be racist. Now, due to the power differential, a woman being sexist or a black person being racist will not have the same CONSEQUENCES as a white male's sexism/racism, but the attitudes CAN be there. I've run into sexist women on my college campus, and racist minorities on the internet... The attitudes these people hold are the same, but opposite. It's rather disturbing, actually... especially to run into the sexist women... Now, I define racism and sexism as a set of attitudes towards others, not necessarily actions. How do you define them? I suspect we have a difference in definition, so thus a difference in resulting opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:04 pm
RoseRose It's rather disturbing, actually... especially to run into the sexist women... I've met lots of sexist women. You know, the "Feminazi" type that believes women can only achieve equal rights by trampelling over men's. rolleyes For some reason, my college was jam-packed with them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:17 pm
BlueRoseTorn RoseRose It's rather disturbing, actually... especially to run into the sexist women... I've met lots of sexist women. You know, the "Feminazi" type that believes women can only achieve equal rights by trampelling over men's. rolleyes For some reason, my college was jam-packed with them. Or women who believe women are inferior to men. Women who criticize other women for wanting careers instead of just being stay-at-home moms. Women who join sexist Facebook groups and laugh about how true the statements in the description are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:19 pm
PhaedraMcSpiffy *sigh* All of the above posts come from Macai's Why Are All Women So Sexist? thread (yes, it's meant to be ironic). It needs some more feminists and pro-choicers right now. Ugh, I went into that thread. I typed up a long, well thought out response, and no one ever responded. No one agreed, no one tried to tear apart my post with stupid arguments. *sigh* I hate being ignored.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
