|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 3:35 am
Hoshit : O
Finally developed film (taken with manual camera.) And printed pictures in le darkroom (filter of 3, 2 stops down.)
This one I scanned in. And then printed off on normal paper to stick in my artbook. And kinda liked how it printed so grainy, and its all ripped like and smudgy. I think it looks ghetto =O So I scanned it in. lolzors :

Original : ( PEE ESS : I know it has scratches and dust stops dammit. But when I was cleaning the negs it just didn't want to remove its dirty badness >__< )

I cry EMO tears when I see this one : XD
 My friend looks sad here. I dun like it very much either = (
BLUE MONDAY =D

Tell me when I become a good photographer already, lol D :
Anyways seriously. Try not to be toooo mean D :
They take me hours to print and develope in the darkroom yo.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 3:49 am
The last one isn't so impressive, but I like the others well enough. I wouldn't say they are great photography, but I like them. I guess that's enough, right?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 5:31 am
The Iconoclast The last one isn't so impressive, but I like the others well enough. I wouldn't say they are great photography, but I like them. I guess that's enough, right? I hate that about photo's. I mean with traditional art (ie. painting), you can like fault technical aspects such as things not drawn in proportion / bad angles / lack of detail ect; But with photography it is just a matter of liking it or not.
I am not sure if I am making much sense. But what I am trying to say is that I wish I could get feedback on things that could improve my pictures from just a 'snapshot' to a piece of 'art.' But its just not like thats -___-
Thanks for your comment ^___^ <3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:32 am
out of all of em...pic three bothers me...probably because I can hear my photography proffessor telling me that this needs less exposure time under the enlarger or that there was too much glare when you shot it....since the subject is starting to melt into the background....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 10:18 pm
warrior_of_boognish out of all of em...pic three bothers me...probably because I can hear my photography proffessor telling me that this needs less exposure time under the enlarger or that there was too much glare when you shot it....since the subject is starting to melt into the background.... Heh yah.
Thanks for commenting <3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 10:41 pm
The Magic Hate Ball The Iconoclast The last one isn't so impressive, but I like the others well enough. I wouldn't say they are great photography, but I like them. I guess that's enough, right? I hate that about photo's. I mean with traditional art (ie. painting), you can like fault technical aspects such as things not drawn in proportion / bad angles / lack of detail ect; But with photography it is just a matter of liking it or not.
I am not sure if I am making much sense. But what I am trying to say is that I wish I could get feedback on things that could improve my pictures from just a 'snapshot' to a piece of 'art.' But its just not like thats -___-
Thanks for your comment ^___^ <3 No, you make perfect sense. And there are technical things that can be said regarding photography, I'm just not the one to ask. I don't know anything about photography.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 pm
It's really for me to evaluate someone's photography unless they really try to show me what all they can do.
If perhaps you could show some photos of different subjects animate or not, that would be great. I mean, even if you were strickly into portraits, at least seeing different people..in different poses/lighting/framing/etc would be better.
I assume you're using digital, because it seems as though you've figured out how you can get a variety of different effects by working with colors and contrast...but variety in the photos themselves is always good too.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:08 pm
Page Boy It's really for me to evaluate someone's photography unless they really try to show me what all they can do. If perhaps you could show some photos of different subjects animate or not, that would be great. I mean, even if you were strickly into portraits, at least seeing different people..in different poses/lighting/framing/etc would be better. I assume you're using digital, because it seems as though you've figured out how you can get a variety of different effects by working with colors and contrast...but variety in the photos themselves is always good too. Yeah, true. I shall try and get some other samples with more variety, as soon as a print some more photos from a film I finished developing recently = ) Which should maybe take one week or so to do and find the time to scan in.
Nah. I use a simple manual camera with true black and white film. Develop in the darkroom. Scan in. And occasionally mess with colour and contrast in photoshop ^__^
Thanks heaps for your comment.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|