Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Pro-Choice Gaians
King George & Bush co. further their arrogant crusade Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Trite~Elegy

PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:10 pm


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070504/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_abortion

Quote:
WASHINGTON - President Bush is warning Democratic leaders that any attempt to weaken federal policies that restrict abortion will be met with a veto.
White House deputy press secretary Tony Fratto said Friday that the warning, issued in letters to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record), was intended to stop abortion amendments from being added to spending bills and other legislation that Congress will be considering in the coming weeks.

"There's nothing specific pending right now," Fratto said.

The Republicans who held power in past sessions of Congress ensured that spending bills included language prohibiting federal funding for abortion except to save the life of the mother or in cases of rape or incest, and restricting funding for international family planning groups that might give advice on or provide abortions.

Now in the minority, House and Senate Republicans recently wrote the president urging him to make clear that any weakening of those restrictions would be unacceptable.

"The standing pattern is that appropriate conscience protections must be in place for health care entities, and that taxpayer dollars may not be used in coercive or involuntary family planning programs," Bush said in letters dated Thursday.

"I will veto any legislation that weakens current federal policies and laws on abortion, or that encourages the destruction of human life at any stage," he wrote.

Bush has already threatened to veto legislation, passed by the House and Senate in different forms this year, that would ease restrictions on federally funded embryonic stem cell research. He killed a similar stem cell bill last year in the first veto of his presidency.

Reid's spokesman, Jim Manley, said that "if the president is serious about finding common ground on this divisive issue, he should support Sen. Reid's efforts to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies in this country." Reid and others are sponsoring legislation that would improve family planning services, require insurance companies to pay for birth control and provide effective sex education for young people.

The letter was hailed by anti-abortion leaders such as Douglas Johnson of the National Right to Life Committee, who said his group appreciates "that the president is drawing a bright line."

"President Bush is not the first man to occupy the Oval Office who talked about valuing preborn life, but no administration has backed up those words with as much consistent policy support as his has," said Dr. James Dobson, founder and chairman of Focus on the Family Action.

On the other side, Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said Bush had essentially told the new Congress "that he wants to continue denying millions of women access to essential medical services, including family planning and safe, legal abortion, even if it means jeopardizing their health."


stare
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:22 pm


But can't 2/3 of Congress override a veto if voted on? And how many Democrats are in Congress?

And Bush is a self-riteous, bumbling old man who has no idea what's going on anyway because he's so deluded with doing what's "right." He may mean well, but intentions aren't actions.

Katsuya Ishtar


Mera Hei

Timid Rogue

PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:42 pm


Why am I not suprised?

Next thing we'll know, abortion will be illegal at all times, regardless of the woman's condition.

*sigh* Sometimes I wonder if there's a single spark of intelligence left in the White House.. or in Congress...

EDIT: Changed the spark of intelligence sentence.
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:45 pm


Katsuya Ishtar
But can't 2/3 of Congress override a veto if voted on? And how many Democrats are in Congress?


Two-thirds of Congress can, yes, but I doubt two-thirds of Congress is pro-choice. The Senate majority is only by one democrat, and not all Democrats are pro-choice. And there are a few pro-choice Republicans. The House has a bigger difference between the parties.

Bush may be a monkey with a typewriter, but he seems to be meaning a lot of the stuff he's been doing lately. He's been vetoing a lot of stuff Congress has thrown at him. It's pretty much a stalemate between them.

[Ernie]


S. Shark

PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:51 pm


President Bush
I will veto any legislation [...] that encourages the destruction of human life at any stage.


Pardon?! Then what the hell does war encourage?
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2007 7:03 pm


Shark called it. biggrin

Katsuya Ishtar
But can't 2/3 of Congress override a veto if voted on? And how many Democrats are in Congress?

And Bush is a self-riteous, bumbling old man who has no idea what's going on anyway because he's so deluded with doing what's "right." He may mean well, but intentions aren't actions.


Democrat does not mean "pro-choice." Most of congress is at least a little anti-choice.

PhaedraMcSpiffy


Katsuya Ishtar

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 4:30 am


PhaedraMcSpiffy
Shark called it. biggrin

Katsuya Ishtar
But can't 2/3 of Congress override a veto if voted on? And how many Democrats are in Congress?

And Bush is a self-riteous, bumbling old man who has no idea what's going on anyway because he's so deluded with doing what's "right." He may mean well, but intentions aren't actions.


Democrat does not mean "pro-choice." Most of congress is at least a little anti-choice.


Damn conservative Democrats...
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 9:16 am


S. Shark
President Bush
I will veto any legislation [...] that encourages the destruction of human life at any stage.


Pardon?! Then what the hell does war encourage?


Sigged for truth.

[Ernie]


Spiral Out

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 9:25 am


Quote:

"I will veto any legislation that weakens current federal policies and laws on abortion, or that encourages the destruction of human life at any stage," he wrote.


lol.

I guess the troops we have fighting in Iraq are puppies and kittens, because they'd better not be human, or Mr. W. is a big fat liar.
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 9:33 am


[Ernie]
S. Shark
President Bush
I will veto any legislation [...] that encourages the destruction of human life at any stage.


Pardon?! Then what the hell does war encourage?


Sigged for truth.


Sigged^2

Katya_Stevens


Half Baked SF

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 10:08 am


Katsuya Ishtar
But can't 2/3 of Congress override a veto if voted on? And how many Democrats are in Congress?

And Bush is a self-riteous, bumbling old man who has no idea what's going on anyway because he's so deluded with doing what's "right." He may mean well, but intentions aren't actions.
That's what we'll have to hope for. But veto overrides aren't common, and I don't know if there are 2/3 of Congress who would vote on that. Congress did fail to override Bush's war spending veto as I understand it.
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 10:51 am


[Ernie]
S. Shark
President Bush
I will veto any legislation [...] that encourages the destruction of human life at any stage.


Pardon?! Then what the hell does war encourage?


Sigged for truth.


Sigged for Truth. A refreshing change from pro-life stalker-boy MindCandy calling me a crazy troll. domokun

Grip of Death


Peppermint Schnapps

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 2:40 pm


Katsuya Ishtar
But can't 2/3 of Congress override a veto if voted on? And how many Democrats are in Congress?

And Bush is a self-riteous, bumbling old man who has no idea what's going on anyway because he's so deluded with doing what's "right." He may mean well, but intentions aren't actions.

the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

anyway, wow, what a freaking moron. as i've said 1959356 times before, i can't wait until November 2008/January 2009. let's just hope women's rights survive until then.
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 4:41 pm


At least two of the republican hopeful's aren't 100% against abortion like Bush is. That's a small thing to be thankful for.

Spiral Out


PhaedraMcSpiffy

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2007 9:48 pm


Spiral Out
At least two of the republican hopeful's aren't 100% against abortion like Bush is. That's a small thing to be thankful for.


Um... which ones are these? Giuliani is about 80% anti-choice, in my opinion. And he's supposedly the "pro-choice" republican.

Even Clinton supports parental notification laws.

Peppermint
the road to hell is paved with good intentions.


Yeah. I TRY to tell myself most lifers are just ignorant... but they're so damn good at it, I think they're doing it on purpose.
Reply
Pro-Choice Gaians

Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum