Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Pro-Choice Gaians
and when you push a little harder..... Goto Page: 1 2 3 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Trite~Elegy

PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:38 pm


Sometimes you win ... biggrin
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070202/ap_on_he_me/cervical_cancer


Quote:

AUSTIN, Texas - Bypassing the Legislature, Republican Gov. Rick Perry signed an order Friday making Texas the first state to require that schoolgirls get vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer.

By issuing an executive order, Perry apparently sidesteps opposition in the Legislature from conservatives and parents' rights groups who fear such a requirement would condone premarital sex and interfere with the way parents raise their children.


Beginning in September 2008, girls entering the sixth grade — meaning, generally, girls ages 11 and 12 — will have to get Gardasil, Merck & Co.'s new vaccine against strains of the human papillomavirus, or HPV.

Perry, a conservative Christian who opposes abortion and stem-cell research using embryonic cells, counts on the religious right for his political base. But he has said the cervical cancer vaccine is no different from the one that protects children against polio.

"The HPV vaccine provides us with an incredible opportunity to effectively target and prevent cervical cancer," Perry said in announcing the order.

Merck is bankrolling efforts to pass state laws across the country mandating Gardasil for girls as young as 11 or 12. It doubled its lobbying budget in Texas and has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country.

Perry has several ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company's three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, Perry's former chief of staff. His current chief of staff's mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government.

Perry also received $6,000 from Merck's political action committee during his re-election campaign.

Texas allows parents to opt out of inoculations by filing an affidavit objecting to the vaccine on religious or philosophical reasons. Even with such provisions, however, conservative groups say such requirements interfere with parents' rights to make medical decisions for their children.

The federal government approved Gardasil in June, and a government advisory panel has recommended that all girls get the shots at 11 and 12, before they are likely to be sexually active.

The New Jersey-based drug company could generate billions in sales if Gardasil — at $360 for the three-shot regimen — were made mandatory across the country. Most insurance companies now cover the vaccine, which has been shown to have no serious side effects.

Merck spokeswoman Janet Skidmore would not say how much the company is spending on lobbyists or how much it has donated to Women in Government. Susan Crosby, the group's president, also declined to specify how much the drug company gave.

A top official from Merck's vaccine division sits on Women in Government's business council, and many of the bills around the country have been introduced by members of Women in Government.
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:56 pm


Huzzah!

MGadda


LadyInWhite

3,800 Points
  • Contributor 150
  • Forum Regular 100
  • Citizen 200
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:19 pm


HOMFG TEXAS!!!!!!!

*does the happy camper dance* domokun domokun heart heart
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:02 pm


I still can't believe these people would rather let their daughters get cancer if they disobey them than have them vaccinated.

Half Baked SF


Trite~Elegy

PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:07 pm


Scare Tactic Propaganda
I still can't believe these people would rather let their daughters get cancer if they disobey them than have them vaccinated.


or those who kill their daughters who might have or have not had sex - to protect 'family honor'.


we may never know the answers to these questions.
we may never know surprised
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:12 pm


Scare Tactic Propaganda
I still can't believe these people would rather let their daughters get cancer if they disobey them than have them vaccinated.

Me too. Ugh.

But I'm glad this got passed! whee

Reinna Astarel


Hentai-tentacle-monster

PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:14 am


It wasn't as if the vaccine wasn't available beforehand. All they did was made it mandatory. What's the big deal?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:35 am


Eh, I am iffy on this whole thing.

On the one hand, the vaccine is undertested, and the state isn't footing the bill (so far as I know), and it violates parent rights and possibly religious rights.

On the other hand, I think the vaccine is probably safe and wiping out a strain of cancer would be a big feather in humanities collective cap, and I don't REALLY mind violating parental and religious rights so long as it isn't TOO over the line (I'm stuck on the fence over whether or not this crosses said line) and is for the general public good.

ThePeerOrlando


MipsyKitten
Crew

PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:15 am


Hentai-tentacle-monster
It wasn't as if the vaccine wasn't available beforehand. All they did was made it mandatory. What's the big deal?

It means that girls can have it done if they want it, regardles of whether or not the parents want them to have it.
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 9:59 am


ThePeerOrlando
Eh, I am iffy on this whole thing.

On the one hand, the vaccine is undertested, and the state isn't footing the bill (so far as I know), and it violates parent rights and possibly religious rights.

On the other hand, I think the vaccine is probably safe and wiping out a strain of cancer would be a big feather in humanities collective cap, and I don't REALLY mind violating parental and religious rights so long as it isn't TOO over the line (I'm stuck on the fence over whether or not this crosses said line) and is for the general public good.


Because it has to do with sex, that why your iffy about it peer, right?
well 70-80% of all american women have HPV - and a good bit did not get it from sex!

Insurances foot the bill and if it's required by state, medicare will pay for it.
States require other vaccines, such as hepititis C (which can be sexually transmitted), why should we falter at one just because some people think it 'might' make their daughters promiscious.
Maybe we should just vaccinating for everything that we've previously vaccinated for because 'ooh it might upset the parents'.

well know what upset me?
last week the school nurse came into my seoncd hour with 4 other nurses/doctors and said they would and did take some blood samples from the people in the class and me because one of the kids in my class, who came in on monday and only went to his first and second hours, had deveolped measels.
But since we were all vaccinated against it, because no one tested posittive for it.
Great huh?

Trite~Elegy


Half Baked SF

PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:33 pm


Trite: What's your source on HPV stats for future reference?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:18 pm


Scare Tactic Propaganda
Trite: What's your source on HPV stats for future reference?



http://www.ashastd.org/index.cfm
the CDC pages for HPV
WebMD
Makethecommitment.org
cancer.gov
medem.com
and about 4 other sites that I'd have to give directions to get to their HPV pages.

k?

Trite~Elegy


LadyDarcia

PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 2:03 pm


O_O ...This happened in Texas?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 2:20 pm


LadyDarcia
O_O ...This happened in Texas?

Suprising, no?

Mera Hei

Timid Rogue

Reply
Pro-Choice Gaians

Goto Page: 1 2 3 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum