|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 4:19 pm
A;SLDKFJSADF, THANKS A LOT ;W;
WAY TO RAISE THE PRICE OF SEALEDS.
*gathers cash in corner*
what do you guys think?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 5:47 pm
I suppose I'm one of the "lucky" few who can actually buy sealeds huh?
I have a feeling the items have to do with the battle system.. I mean why else get everyone excited to raise inflation and just get griped at some more by users who can't afford them... either in RL or Gaia
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:16 pm
At first, when I skimmed the title, I thought it read, "TT_____TT screw you tina." I was so shocked and upset. ;_______;
Yeah. Schtupid mods. >> "Three items, same price, more value!" Pssh. Yeah, right. Same price. People are definitely going to jack up the price since there's three items. I should get them. :] Inflation should go up the most on them? =o
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 7:10 pm
Waah.
I feel stupid I sold 8 sealeds yesterday and now their price rose by 6k. T___T
I want atleast 3 sealeds before December 15.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 8:25 pm
LemonCondom Waah. I feel stupid I sold 8 sealeds yesterday and now their price rose by 6k. T___T I want atleast 3 sealeds before December 15. *pats* there there.. you couldn't have known... at most when released they normally would've only rose 1 or 2k... I have to wonder if it's going to have a total impact on the sealeds as much as normal inflation. I mean.. sealeds used to be only 4 or 5k... now they go for around 10k at least. and with the new realease do you think they are going to go up more? like to 15-18k and stay as a norm. price for sealeds? I'm not sure if I'm saddened gonk or elated whee maybe a bit of both. neutral
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:18 pm
Everything became super inflated after I left gaia. O :
I just wish things were the same as they were back in early 04. <3 Those were the days. xD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:03 pm
 Kabang!!
even though she is an un-playable character. i commented her saying that,,,, she FREAKING RAISED SEALEDS BY 10K >:/O
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 4:40 am
LemonCondom Everything became super inflated after I left gaia. O : So it's your fault! >:0 <3
rofl heart
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:56 am
I always hated her....this just gives me a legitimate reason to.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:23 pm
I think I'm pissed off about this. xd I'd be more so if I were buying letters like I used to.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:42 pm
its a way to get people to buy more. with 2 you only had to buy 2 letters, but if you want all three....then you have to buy three letters eek
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:10 pm
Wow, seriously. I'm not one to gripe like ******** Jesus Christ. Thanks for screwing all the underdogs over Rina. b***h >__>;;
Even my distrubutor has tallied and calculated how much this is going to cost her. Already I'm paying 10k for two letters. Now 3? x___x;
Seriously, I think 3 items is stupid. If I didn't know better it sounds like the admins might be profiting from this.
Here's the deduction:
1. Price = Demand/ Supply ratio. 2. If demand rises and supply keeps steady (Those who pay real money are the suppliers, all buyers of gold are just passing the letter around. It doesn't generate). 3. Admins diversify their two letters into 3 (from one client, if one client buys two letters for each possible item avaible from that month's letter, than the equation is now: S = 2.50x (x is variable of letters which now becomes 3 because of 3 possible letters). 4. This will grant the supply level to rise, demand will surely rise as well.
If the demanders are unable to buy the supplier's price than they will find a new way to obtain their demand other ways 'sides gold.
Real money.
Simply as that. So now I'm assuming a lot of people will resort to asking their mommys and daddys for their money instead of working hard and long to meet a due date of the 15th.
I confused myself x_x
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 4:18 pm
That just about covers it Mike. <3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:40 pm
Xeroxer Wow, seriously. I'm not one to gripe like ******** Jesus Christ. Thanks for screwing all the underdogs over Rina. b***h >__>;; Even my distrubutor has tallied and calculated how much this is going to cost her. Already I'm paying 10k for two letters. Now 3? x___x; Seriously, I think 3 items is stupid. If I didn't know better it sounds like the admins might be profiting from this. Here's the deduction: 1. Price = Demand/ Supply ratio. 2. If demand rises and supply keeps steady (Those who pay real money are the suppliers, all buyers of gold are just passing the letter around. It doesn't generate). 3. Admins diversify their two letters into 3 (from one client, if one client buys two letters for each possible item avaible from that month's letter, than the equation is now: S = 2.50x (x is variable of letters which now becomes 3 because of 3 possible letters). 4. This will grant the supply level to rise, demand will surely rise as well. If the demanders are unable to buy the supplier's price than they will find a new way to obtain their demand other ways 'sides gold. Real money. Simply as that. So now I'm assuming a lot of people will resort to asking their mommys and daddys for their money instead of working hard and long to meet a due date of the 15th. I confused myself x_x so basically they're leeching the money out of us >:0~
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:47 pm
Kimi, Stixorz: :3 It seems possible. I mean, once you find a way to boost gold prices, a Pixelated economy, people will see the difference between effort. Because everyone knows industrial countries prefer using money instead of effort.
So what would you rather do?
Raise 8k in about a month if you're really good at posting.
or pay a measley 2.50, the money you gained for working about 2 hours at Mcdonald's?
I think the answer is pretty clear.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|