|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:55 pm
Last year we were debating stuff in class. We had to do essays, with our arguments and possible rebuttals. I did my argument on Martial Arts. Most people think it's what starts fights. In my opinion, it isn't. It's not the knowledge that starts the fight, it's the misuse of it. For example: If some random kid plays GTA, and then imitates it's stunts in real life, he's ********. It's not the games fault (it was made for entertainment), it's the idiot who brings it into real life, by imitating it.
Here's my essay (I understand if you call it childish or short, I wrote it in the beginning of last year [Grade 8] sweatdrop ) :
Martial Arts, the fighting knowledge movie stars use in their theatrical fight sequences, is often something that people want to learn how to do. Martial Arts, is the knowledge of fighting. It has been around for 2000-5000 years. People should learn it to know how to defend them-selves. If people want to take a Martial Art that helps them stay fit and learn how to fight, then my advice to them is: All Martial Arts help you stay fit, but Kickboxing is particularly really good for developing abs. An estimated 18.1 million Americans participated in some form of martial arts at least once in the past year. Included in that estimate are 9.4 million adults, 5.5 million teenagers and 3.2 million kids. Some of the number of people who don’t take Martial Arts think that it is what starts fights in real life.
I’m absolutely sure that anyone who has taken Martial Arts will agree with me when I say that, anybody who teaches Martial Arts will always emphasize that the knowledge that they give you is not for starting fights, but for defending yourself if a need ever arises.
I myself take Kung-Fu and Kickboxing, for which there are punching bags and a fighting ring, in the back. Once every week after our class we get to go in the ring to test out our newly acquired knowledge. The purpose of that, is to train us to defend ourselves (and to prepare for future tournaments). The punching bags also help you take out your anger. Someone on the other side of the debate (someone who thinks that Martial Arts is the cause of fights) might think that: After testing your knowledge out in the ring, you might just go to school tomorrow and use you Kung-Fu to beat up the next person who tries to bully you. A possible rebuttal from my side might be: It is not the knowledge that starts the fight, it is the misuse of the knowledge that starts them. It is taught to you for self-defence, not to beat someone up. Some one might then say that a not-aggressive person (person who starts) fights like me will hesitate to hit someone if I’m in a fight, so Martial Arts is a waste of money. A possible rebuttal from me might be: That is what the ring is for, it teaches you how to defend yourself during a fight. I now will not hesitate for one second to hit someone after they have tried to harm me.
In conclusion I say that people should participate in some Martial Art. It helps you stay fit. It teaches you how to defend yourself. It also teaches you discipline/self-control. For the people that still think Martial Arts is dangerous and the cause of fights, I say: Go to some Martial Art school, and watch what they do. Observe them, and what the teacher explains to them. How to use it, when to use it, and why to use it. In my opinion, if you do that much then your opinion on the matter will probably change; maybe some more than others.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:28 pm
Your essay was a bit shaky, but that's probably because I have a perfectionist as a teacher. I agree with Martial Arts all the way because in Tae Kwon Do, it's a rule that you can't use anything in class outside of the dojo unless defending yourself when someone else physically hit you first or someone else is being beaten up for no reason. If you break that rule, you get into a lot of trouble. I know that's only for one Martial Art, but still that is more proof that Martial Arts are designed for the asset of the world if used correctly.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:52 pm
hmm... martial arts works if you know martial arts.. and they don't.. lol.. also doesn't work if they use projectiles on you.. lol.. xp
horrah for martial arts..
hm... people that use martial arts dont' usually start the fights... the ones that start fights learn grappling confused to take your opponent down.. as martial arts is only good to defend yourself or someone with..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:08 am
tickledpink6291 Your essay was a bit shaky, but that's probably because I have a perfectionist as a teacher. I agree with Martial Arts all the way because in Tae Kwon Do, it's a rule that you can't use anything in class outside of the dojo unless defending yourself when someone else physically hit you first or someone else is being beaten up for no reason. If you break that rule, you get into a lot of trouble. I know that's only for one Martial Art, but still that is more proof that Martial Arts are designed for the asset of the world if used correctly. Like, I said: I wrote it last year. I rushed it, it was a last minute essay sweatdrop .
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:10 am
clipclop hmm... martial arts works if you know martial arts.. and they don't.. lol.. also doesn't work if they use projectiles on you.. lol.. xp horrah for martial arts.. hm... people that use martial arts dont' usually start the fights... the ones that start fights learn grappling confused to take your opponent down.. as martial arts is only good to defend yourself or someone with.. Martial Arts is the Art of fighting. One martial art might focus on striking; another might focus on grappling, another might focus on both. I guess if you know all of them (which is practically impossible, unless you train with the shaolin monks ninja ), you're almost untouchable dramallama .
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:33 am
Posts would be appreciated people sweatdrop .
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:20 am
I agree that martial arts is for self-defense. However, on a completely irrelevant note, I disagree with the example of the kid and GTA. Learned behaviors don't necessarily constitute misuse of violence.
I, personally, took 3 years of American Kenpo Karate and acheived Brown Belt #3 (right before black belt). I stopped because my school focus was falling apart. I have experience similar to yours.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:22 pm
I think Ninjutsu or ninpo is the best martial art. I appreciate the philosophy in a lot of old eastern martial art films.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:27 pm
Emoti I think Ninjutsu or ninpo is the best martial art. I appreciate the philosophy in a lot of old eastern martial art films. There is no best martial art. It's all a matter of opinion.
@Love: Tell me what's wrong with the GTA example.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:20 pm
I take American Karate lessons at my all-girls college.
The teacher told us in the second lesson to run away first. She's like, "Don't get caught, don't have to fight." And then she said, "Get caught, your objective is just to get away." Everything we're learning as beginners, apparently, is to avoid fighting unless it comes down to life or death. I suppose that's how the Buddhists viewed it when they first started the martial arts, considering they weren't allowed to even hold weapons in case they were mugged.
The little booklet also said that you were supposed to work on merely transferring fear into the attacker so that he runs away instead of attacking. Something like you transfer his hostility and violence back onto him.
I don't know how little me with a high-pitched voice is going to achieve that, but we'll see.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:54 am
[XxGuardianDevilxX] Emoti I think Ninjutsu or ninpo is the best martial art. I appreciate the philosophy in a lot of old eastern martial art films. There is no best martial art. It's all a matter of opinion. However, some are better suited to certain tasks than others. For pure self-defence, there are better and worse martial arts. For keeping yourself in shape and learning to control your body and mind, there are better and worse martial arts. For sport and competitive fighting, there are better and worse martial arts. No martial arts can be declared "the best" all-around, but neither can you say that all martial arts are equal on all levels. I personally train in judo, purely because it helps me keep in shape and because of the competitive aspect, especially mat grappling. I do not fight nor do I want to, but I would imagine that all dojo manners and teachings would fly out of the window in a streetfight, right next to civility and humanity.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:03 am
Bushmeister [XxGuardianDevilxX] Emoti I think Ninjutsu or ninpo is the best martial art. I appreciate the philosophy in a lot of old eastern martial art films. There is no best martial art. It's all a matter of opinion. However, some are better suited to certain tasks than others. For pure self-defence, there are better and worse martial arts. For keeping yourself in shape and learning to control your body and mind, there are better and worse martial arts. For sport and competitive fighting, there are better and worse martial arts. No martial arts can be declared "the best" all-around, but neither can you say that all martial arts are equal on all levels. I personally train in judo, purely because it helps me keep in shape and because of the competitive aspect, especially mat grappling. I do not fight nor do I want to, but I would imagine that all dojo manners and teachings would fly out of the window in a streetfight, right next to civility and humanity. Lol, isnt that unfortunate to say? That the ultimate defence is just an all out brawl?... I personally believe that one who is a master of a fighting style can defeat a simple street fighter, but those who have not yet completed training would abandon their practice at the first sight of trouble and go off instinct, mostly because as much as they want to they dont trust their fighting style.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:04 pm
Blood`Eternity Bushmeister [XxGuardianDevilxX] Emoti I think Ninjutsu or ninpo is the best martial art. I appreciate the philosophy in a lot of old eastern martial art films. There is no best martial art. It's all a matter of opinion. However, some are better suited to certain tasks than others. For pure self-defence, there are better and worse martial arts. For keeping yourself in shape and learning to control your body and mind, there are better and worse martial arts. For sport and competitive fighting, there are better and worse martial arts. No martial arts can be declared "the best" all-around, but neither can you say that all martial arts are equal on all levels. I personally train in judo, purely because it helps me keep in shape and because of the competitive aspect, especially mat grappling. I do not fight nor do I want to, but I would imagine that all dojo manners and teachings would fly out of the window in a streetfight, right next to civility and humanity. Lol, isnt that unfortunate to say? That the ultimate defence is just an all out brawl?... I personally believe that one who is a master of a fighting style can defeat a simple street fighter, but those who have not yet completed training would abandon their practice at the first sight of trouble and go off instinct, mostly because as much as they want to they dont trust their fighting style. Trust me, street brawling gets you nowhere. If you're just holding on to each other with one hand and slugging with the other, no damage is being done. You have to take a step back and make them play your game. Make them fight at your pace. Almost everyone knows how to street fight. If you know a different style, then use it to your advantage.
@Missy Wyvern: If you can't do nothing by scaring them, then I would suggest let them attack, and use their force against them. Aikido is good for that type of thing. It's a defencive martial art that uses the strikers force and balance against them. For me running is the very last resort wink .
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:31 pm
Some martial arts like Tai Chi, and Aikido often do not teach you how to strike first. Aikido ot my knowledge is purely in response and various splinter forms have made attack actions. Tai Chi is all about balance and even teaches that it is better to avoid than fight.
A great deal of martial arts teach that it is better to not use what you know, and t oonly use it when necesary for safety.
I don't think what you wrote is well written. Or rather it lacks a great deal of eloquence.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:45 pm
Moonlite Symphony Some martial arts like Tai Chi, and Aikido often do not teach you how to strike first. Aikido ot my knowledge is purely in response and various splinter forms have made attack actions. Tai Chi is all about balance and even teaches that it is better to avoid than fight.
A great deal of martial arts teach that it is better to not use what you know, and t oonly use it when necesary for safety.
I don't think what you wrote is well written. Or rather it lacks a great deal of eloquence. (1) I agree with the first 2 paragraphs that you wrote 3nodding . (2) Like I said it, was something I did the night before, and I had to rush it. xp
One last thing: what does eloquence mean sweatdrop ?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|