|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 7:18 am
Formerly known as the 2003 French film, Haute Tension. Anybody gonna see this?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 9:55 am
Sci-Fi_man97 Formerly known as the 2003 French film, Haute Tension. Anybody gonna see this? Soz never heard of it sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 12:47 pm
Prodigis Sci-Fi_man97 Formerly known as the 2003 French film, Haute Tension. Anybody gonna see this? Soz never heard of it sweatdrop Really? Ive been seeing the Tv spots non-stop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 7:06 pm
Local newspaper gave it ZERO STARS (the first time I've ever seen such a rating given by these critics--even the dreadful House of Wax remake which the paper acknowledged as nothing more than filler before Revenge of the Sith came out in theaters received a two-out-of-four rating)! New York Times said the most entertaining thing about the film before the violence is seeing how the dubbing does not match with the lips.
I never planned on seeing the film anyway; Lion's Gate originally wanted to distribute the film uncensored and with subtitles, but that idea never came about so the voices were dubbed and the film was cut to receive an R-rating.
However, if you are dying to see a French slasher film with obvious Argento influence, I'd suggest Deep in the Woods, perhaps the best post-Scream slasher to date. Deffinitely worth one's time and money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The_Wicked_Man Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:17 am
I heard the dubbing was awful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:13 pm
I really want to see it, but i'm going to wait until the french uncut version is released, but i am so mad because they gave away the end in the commercial...dumb dumb very dumb!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The_Wicked_Man Vice Captain
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:31 pm
Dartanion550 I really want to see it, but i'm going to wait until the french uncut version is released, but i am so mad because they gave away the end in the commercial...dumb dumb very dumb! The did!? Wow, how poor and unexperienced must the film distributors and/or marketers be if they give away something that is obviously the ending in a commercial and/or trailer. An unexcuseable action, I must say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:18 pm
well from what i hear its pretty good i havent seen it yet but i will soon enough...you kno wi havent seen any good movies lately nothing seems to scare me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:46 pm
Yeah, they did give away the ending in the commercial. That ending made me so mad. It was a great movie until the end. It did nothing but create endless plot holes. However, it's a really good film for gore and tension, hence the name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:05 am
I haven't seen it yet......Is it good?? question xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:00 pm
Well I bought and watched it this tuesday when it came out unrated. I loved it granted the twist wasn't needed, it was there. After thinking about the film and watching it for a second time, it all made sense, except for one of the first scene's where we first see the "killer" with the girl. It doesn't fit in anywhere except for just shock value.Also I didn't think it was that scary, but it was still great
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 3:15 pm
Heard of it...never watched it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 4:05 pm
The_Wicked_Man Local newspaper gave it ZERO STARS (the first time I've ever seen such a rating given by these critics--even the dreadful House of Wax remake which the paper acknowledged as nothing more than filler before Revenge of the Sith came out in theaters received a two-out-of-four rating)! New York Times said the most entertaining thing about the film before the violence is seeing how the dubbing does not match with the lips. I never planned on seeing the film anyway; Lion's Gate originally wanted to distribute the film uncensored and with subtitles, but that idea never came about so the voices were dubbed and the film was cut to receive an R-rating. However, if you are dying to see a French slasher film with obvious Argento influence, I'd suggest Deep in the Woods, perhaps the best post- Scream slasher to date. Deffinitely worth one's time and money. 0_o ZeRo?!?!?!? I thought that movie was awsome!!!! Ofcourse I have a preference for Gore (see Siggy) ^_^ and this movie had lots of it ^_^.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:01 pm
The_Wicked_Man Local newspaper gave it ZERO STARS (the first time I've ever seen such a rating given by these critics--even the dreadful House of Wax remake which the paper acknowledged as nothing more than filler before Revenge of the Sith came out in theaters received a two-out-of-four rating)! New York Times said the most entertaining thing about the film before the violence is seeing how the dubbing does not match with the lips. I never planned on seeing the film anyway; Lion's Gate originally wanted to distribute the film uncensored and with subtitles, but that idea never came about so the voices were dubbed and the film was cut to receive an R-rating. However, if you are dying to see a French slasher film with obvious Argento influence, I'd suggest Deep in the Woods, perhaps the best post- Scream slasher to date. Deffinitely worth one's time and money. Wow. That's pretty bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:52 am
They should have kept the title "Switchblade Romance", i find it better suiting then high tension.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
