Jaft likes thinking. Jaft thinks a lot. He has time to think on the Bart or when he waits for a bus or when he lies down in bed unable to sleep. When Jaft thinks... he thinks really hard. Jaft loves thinking. This time Jaft was thinking about homosexuality.
*You will see the word homosexual a lot here. I did not use the word sodomy or gay or lesbian or dyke or any other term for homosexual homosexuality. I'm using homosexual just out of preference and interchangeability. And now begins the thought.
A man having sexual intercourse with another man does not mean he is homosexual.
A woman having sexual intercourse with another woman does not mean she is homosexual.
A man having sexual intercourse with a woman does not make him heterosexual and vice versa.
Understand what I'm trying to say? IF you do, give yourself a pat on the back for being able to think differently or for having gained some maturity. biggrin
For those who don't, I'm going to go deep, deep into my thought pools and will explain to the best of my abilities, the point I'm trying to make.
I shall reiterate the first point, having sexual intercourse does not determine if you are straight, homosexual, or bisexual.
gonk But Jaft, homosexuality means someone who does or wants the naughty nooky with a member of the same sex.
You’ll see what I mean Gonk Emoticon. Sexual intercourse is just a physical act in order to stimulate one’s self sexually, sometimes to the point of orgasm. How does an act make one homosexual or straight? If Jaft has sexual intercourse with a man does he become homosexual? If he has sexual intercourse with a woman instead does he become heterosexual? The answer is no because Jaft has a different definition… a Jaftinition if you will.
You can go and have sexual intercourse with anyone you want and Jaft would not be able to say if you’re homosexual or heterosexual. Sexual intercourse cannot define the sexual orientation.
gonk But Jaft, come on. If I make out with a guy, I am most definitely a homosexual.
No. I have thought of a test that can reproduced by anyone and they will find out how useless sexual intercourse of any kind is in determining true sexual orientation. After you do this test, those hot young college girls who say they were only experimenting were indeed experimenting.
The test goes by the name of The Blindfold Test.
What you do is collect a willing male and female friend that you have not had sexual intercourse with. If you wish to spice up the test a little bit, throw in an animal too.
Then, you put on a blindfold that cannot be seen through and prepare yourself to receive oral sexual intercourse or massages or etc. etc. What you will find out is, with your blindfold on, you will be aroused by man and woman and/or animal. This is assuming you are a healthy person with no sexual complications and that your willing participants are able to sexually satisfy, I’m referring to technique.
Whatever they decided to do to you, you would most likely find yourself in an aroused physical and possibly mental state and maybe achieve an orgasm in the process. The anonymity of the test makes whoever pleasing just a being… with no gender being specified by your eyes.
With the blindfold, the hand that touches you is not a woman’s hand or a man’s hand or a monkey’s hand… it’s just a hand.
Try repeating this test without the blindfold and you will find it hard to… complete the test.
The end result is, through sexual stimulation, you enjoyed the experience from both participants, three if you used an animal.
Does this mean you are now a bisexual? Nope. You are just a healthy human being who responds well to sexual stimulation.
gonk But Jaft, what defines sexual orientation then?
Good question. Something that science and language have difficulty describing, something that is felt and experienced rather than studied, love. Love. That’s it! Depending on who you love, you can determine your sexual orientation.
Not the “I love p***y!” kind of love, I’m talking about a romantic relationship with a partner that you may be with for life or a long period of time, hopefully.
Sexual intercourse is just not dependable with determining sexual orientation. A homosexual man sometimes has sexual intercourse [with a woman] to cover up his love for men. See what I mean? He’s not a bisexual because he has sexual intercourse with men and women, he’s instead, a homosexual because he loves men, and not because he is a lover of men (I mean that sexually). Sexual intercourse is just an action and it’s easy to do with anything.
Jaft could have sexual intercourse with a blanket. Does that make him a blanketsexual? No. He has to love the blanket, despite knowing that the blanket will never return his intense love for it. Then he would be a blanketsexual.
Remember, this is what my mind thinks… And I love my mind!
gonk But Jaft, what about hermaphodites and transsexuals?
That’s an interesting and super duper question you asked Gonk Emoticon. True hermaphrodites cannot be homosexual or heterosexual or bisexual because hermaphrodites are man and woman at the same time, all the time. People who are involved with hermaphrodites romantically cannot be considered heterosexual or homosexual because hermaphrodites are a third kind of human. They need their own specific words to describe some of their actions such as sexual intercourse.
Those transsexuals, on the other hand, can be chalked up as homosexual or heterosexual because their organs are “fake” and cannot reproduce the effects of the natural genitalia of normal people. A man who changes himself into a woman will still be a man because all they did was remove certain parts of his body and then alter his skin while stuffing his chest with… cream filling. biggrin
As technology advances though and the sexual organs are able to function as they should, their sexual orientation can be determined by whatever gender they choose to be.
In conclusion, love can define who is homosexual, heterosexual, and bisexual. Sex cannot, due to the flaws it exhibits and sexual intercourse can be had with nearly anything. Even that vat of good looking mercury…
Hope you found my line or branch of thought interesting.
~Jaft
*You will see the word homosexual a lot here. I did not use the word sodomy or gay or lesbian or dyke or any other term for homosexual homosexuality. I'm using homosexual just out of preference and interchangeability. And now begins the thought.
A man having sexual intercourse with another man does not mean he is homosexual.
A woman having sexual intercourse with another woman does not mean she is homosexual.
A man having sexual intercourse with a woman does not make him heterosexual and vice versa.
Understand what I'm trying to say? IF you do, give yourself a pat on the back for being able to think differently or for having gained some maturity. biggrin
For those who don't, I'm going to go deep, deep into my thought pools and will explain to the best of my abilities, the point I'm trying to make.
I shall reiterate the first point, having sexual intercourse does not determine if you are straight, homosexual, or bisexual.
gonk But Jaft, homosexuality means someone who does or wants the naughty nooky with a member of the same sex.
You’ll see what I mean Gonk Emoticon. Sexual intercourse is just a physical act in order to stimulate one’s self sexually, sometimes to the point of orgasm. How does an act make one homosexual or straight? If Jaft has sexual intercourse with a man does he become homosexual? If he has sexual intercourse with a woman instead does he become heterosexual? The answer is no because Jaft has a different definition… a Jaftinition if you will.
You can go and have sexual intercourse with anyone you want and Jaft would not be able to say if you’re homosexual or heterosexual. Sexual intercourse cannot define the sexual orientation.
gonk But Jaft, come on. If I make out with a guy, I am most definitely a homosexual.
No. I have thought of a test that can reproduced by anyone and they will find out how useless sexual intercourse of any kind is in determining true sexual orientation. After you do this test, those hot young college girls who say they were only experimenting were indeed experimenting.
The test goes by the name of The Blindfold Test.
What you do is collect a willing male and female friend that you have not had sexual intercourse with. If you wish to spice up the test a little bit, throw in an animal too.
Then, you put on a blindfold that cannot be seen through and prepare yourself to receive oral sexual intercourse or massages or etc. etc. What you will find out is, with your blindfold on, you will be aroused by man and woman and/or animal. This is assuming you are a healthy person with no sexual complications and that your willing participants are able to sexually satisfy, I’m referring to technique.
Whatever they decided to do to you, you would most likely find yourself in an aroused physical and possibly mental state and maybe achieve an orgasm in the process. The anonymity of the test makes whoever pleasing just a being… with no gender being specified by your eyes.
With the blindfold, the hand that touches you is not a woman’s hand or a man’s hand or a monkey’s hand… it’s just a hand.
Try repeating this test without the blindfold and you will find it hard to… complete the test.
The end result is, through sexual stimulation, you enjoyed the experience from both participants, three if you used an animal.
Does this mean you are now a bisexual? Nope. You are just a healthy human being who responds well to sexual stimulation.
gonk But Jaft, what defines sexual orientation then?
Good question. Something that science and language have difficulty describing, something that is felt and experienced rather than studied, love. Love. That’s it! Depending on who you love, you can determine your sexual orientation.
Not the “I love p***y!” kind of love, I’m talking about a romantic relationship with a partner that you may be with for life or a long period of time, hopefully.
Sexual intercourse is just not dependable with determining sexual orientation. A homosexual man sometimes has sexual intercourse [with a woman] to cover up his love for men. See what I mean? He’s not a bisexual because he has sexual intercourse with men and women, he’s instead, a homosexual because he loves men, and not because he is a lover of men (I mean that sexually). Sexual intercourse is just an action and it’s easy to do with anything.
Jaft could have sexual intercourse with a blanket. Does that make him a blanketsexual? No. He has to love the blanket, despite knowing that the blanket will never return his intense love for it. Then he would be a blanketsexual.
Remember, this is what my mind thinks… And I love my mind!
gonk But Jaft, what about hermaphodites and transsexuals?
That’s an interesting and super duper question you asked Gonk Emoticon. True hermaphrodites cannot be homosexual or heterosexual or bisexual because hermaphrodites are man and woman at the same time, all the time. People who are involved with hermaphrodites romantically cannot be considered heterosexual or homosexual because hermaphrodites are a third kind of human. They need their own specific words to describe some of their actions such as sexual intercourse.
Those transsexuals, on the other hand, can be chalked up as homosexual or heterosexual because their organs are “fake” and cannot reproduce the effects of the natural genitalia of normal people. A man who changes himself into a woman will still be a man because all they did was remove certain parts of his body and then alter his skin while stuffing his chest with… cream filling. biggrin
As technology advances though and the sexual organs are able to function as they should, their sexual orientation can be determined by whatever gender they choose to be.
In conclusion, love can define who is homosexual, heterosexual, and bisexual. Sex cannot, due to the flaws it exhibits and sexual intercourse can be had with nearly anything. Even that vat of good looking mercury…
Hope you found my line or branch of thought interesting.
~Jaft
