|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:21 pm
Our beloved publisher wishes to give you a friendly message: Folks, the Outlaw's Guide to the Galaxy isn't getting any smaller. Not that I'm complaining mind you. Nonetheless, a little organization might be in order and this is going to be the place for it.
Here you can request or suggest entries, discuss articles, and b***h about what you dont like. I want the guild favorite reference thread to be more useful and user friendly. And while I may be the mastermind behind it, I dont always know what you guys want to see. So feel free to speak your mind about my favorite brainchild just shy of the Cheese Star.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:12 pm
I don't know about you guys... but I find the stats posted by Elladan Kenet for his starships outrageously overpowered in terms of starfighter compliment. I mean... he'd got hundreds of starfighters pooring forth from vessels that normally only carried around 24... That's just wrong.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:16 pm
Plus his lack of actual upgrading on his ships.
His Nohgri entry was good though.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:25 pm
So should that warrant disposal?
Or should we have fanon things reviewed?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:28 pm
I'd vote for Reviewing.
Whats been recomended to me prieviously is that Fanon Articles should be submitted for aproval before going into the guild.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:33 pm
Yeah... we should also have provisions against GOD ships and the like. Everything has to have some sort of weakness.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:38 pm
A vessel which performs well in everything, can destroy a ship in a single attack with little effort, and is impossible to destroy.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:41 pm
Duly noted.
From now on, Fanon Entry ideas need to be posted here before being thrown in the guide so we can see weither it will be hit or miss.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:50 pm
Um... Why am I now damned by you Cale?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:26 pm
You cursed us by bringing us to the thirteenth page.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:29 pm
Are we still trying to be comical and have the outlaw's take on things still for the guide, or are you going or the more formalized text?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:31 pm
Hey... outlaws come in all shapes and sizes. Some of them can be quite analytical, case in point - Karrde.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:35 pm
Its the Outlaw's Guide to the galaxy.
So "m sticking to the Outlaw's take of things.
But I'm not restircting people to it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:37 pm
stellarmagic Hey... outlaws come in all shapes and sizes. Some of them can be quite analytical, case in point - Karrde. True. But then again, Karrde isn't the first person to come to mind when outlaw is said.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|