|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:50 pm
You know, the ones we're actually going to listen too. XD A definate list would be best than just going, "Who wants to be the sheep this round? =D" We already know that Belle will be for sure. Now, we need to know some people for sure are also going to do the same thing. /coughI'dkindareallyliketocough/ xD But anyways, yeah. If we're going to do this, we need to be more organized about it. ._.;
Ok. So, since Mori came up with the plan on getting people that want to go to jail in jail to be on our side by vollunteering, I think it only fair he go first. So, please vote for him, than suck up to go with him if you want to? XD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:52 pm
Or we don't do it at all. =/
I really think that we shouldn't worry about people in jail being on our side.
We need to worry about people who are suspsious. So we don't have 5 suspisous people left in the last rounds. =/
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:04 pm
Vote me in.
Subliminal- Why do we have to do the same old thing every game. That is soooo boring. I think we should do the jailing volunteers thing, because it's different and once we get enough people in, we can vote two suspicious people in.
Why can't you just try it out.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:06 pm
The only problem I see with this thing is, when we vote a suspicious person in, they get power. It's like, how do we know if we're voiting the right people in jail?
Let's say Bob is suspicious. Bob has evidence against him, that proves he's the sniper. We sheep Bob in Jail. Bob's not the sniper. Will Bob reaaaly try to help us catch the Sniper if we ganged up on him? @__@
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:13 pm
KingShoy The only problem I see with this thing is, when we vote a suspicious person in, they get power. It's like, how do we know if we're voiting the right people in jail?
Let's say Bob is suspicious. Bob has evidence against him, that proves he's the sniper. We sheep Bob in Jail. Bob's not the sniper. Will Bob reaaaly try to help us catch the Sniper if we ganged up on him? @__@ This is a good point... especially, if it turns out the ck is somebody like Meru... who will be all "don't vote me into jail" and people won't vote her in... hmm...
but then again, can we still trust the people we we ARE sheeping into jail, voluntarily? how do you not know that the ck isn't the person telling them to go into jail to save their asses?? How can you prove to me that Belle isn't in with the CK?? There is just no way of knowing is there?? We could be setting the CK for a win here
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:20 pm
::coughcough:: All other things aside. I came up with this whole plan in the first place, I'd like to be able to get sheeped, if possible. :3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:24 pm
buzzkid24 KingShoy The only problem I see with this thing is, when we vote a suspicious person in, they get power. It's like, how do we know if we're voiting the right people in jail?
Let's say Bob is suspicious. Bob has evidence against him, that proves he's the sniper. We sheep Bob in Jail. Bob's not the sniper. Will Bob reaaaly try to help us catch the Sniper if we ganged up on him? @__@ This is a good point... especially, if it turns out the ck is somebody like Meru... who will be all "don't vote me into jail" and people won't vote her in... hmm...
but then again, can we still trust the people we we ARE sheeping into jail, voluntarily? how do you not know that the ck isn't the person telling them to go into jail to save their asses?? How can you prove to me that Belle isn't in with the CK?? There is just no way of knowing is there?? We could be setting the CK for a win here With this new system, we could get screwed either way. But which one has less of a chance of that, I ask?
@Mori: Agreed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:25 pm
Mori Bokusochi ::coughcough:: All other things aside. I came up with this whole plan in the first place, I'd like to be able to get sheeped, if possible. :3 You know, your color is broken.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:25 pm
Why do we have to be all "OMG WIN GAME BEFORE 8 ROUNDS" Why can't we have fun for once. DDDDDD:
Christa is in a hyper mood, leave her alone plz. <3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:31 pm
The Peanut Smuggler buzzkid24 KingShoy The only problem I see with this thing is, when we vote a suspicious person in, they get power. It's like, how do we know if we're voiting the right people in jail?
Let's say Bob is suspicious. Bob has evidence against him, that proves he's the sniper. We sheep Bob in Jail. Bob's not the sniper. Will Bob reaaaly try to help us catch the Sniper if we ganged up on him? @__@ This is a good point... especially, if it turns out the ck is somebody like Meru... who will be all "don't vote me into jail" and people won't vote her in... hmm...
but then again, can we still trust the people we we ARE sheeping into jail, voluntarily? how do you not know that the ck isn't the person telling them to go into jail to save their asses?? How can you prove to me that Belle isn't in with the CK?? There is just no way of knowing is there?? We could be setting the CK for a win here With this new system, we could get screwed either way. But which one has less of a chance of that, I ask?
@Mori: Agreed. they both have the same amount of chance to screw us over...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:34 pm
I say we vote in people that are not super popular, not suspicious, and nice, not the popular suspicious expected ones. Because, 1, we'll most likely have people on our side, and 2, those people also tend to have roles sometimes. Only, these people would also need to be volunteers. Take me and Mori for example. People like us. I think that's a less chance of getting screwed...? >.>;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:42 pm
The Peanut Smuggler I say we vote in people that are not super popular, not suspicious, and nice, not the popular suspicious expected ones. Because, 1, we'll most likely have people on our side, and 2, those people also tend to have roles sometimes. Only, these people would also need to be volunteers. Take me and Mori for example. People like us. I think that's a less chance of getting screwed...? >.>; I think that publicly asking people to vote you in make you seem like you have an hidden agenda ninja
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:47 pm
Um... OK? I just want to be in jail for once. >.>; /lame/
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:56 pm
buzzkid24 The Peanut Smuggler I say we vote in people that are not super popular, not suspicious, and nice, not the popular suspicious expected ones. Because, 1, we'll most likely have people on our side, and 2, those people also tend to have roles sometimes. Only, these people would also need to be volunteers. Take me and Mori for example. People like us. I think that's a less chance of getting screwed...? >.>; I think that publicly asking people to vote you in make you seem like you have an hidden agenda ninja D; My agendas not hidden. *Gives him agenda* there you go. smile
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|