|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 2:51 am
I've had an idea for a running contest.
Every week, someone will come up with an inatimate object.
You have to find a sexually orented photo including said object.
But here's the kicker:
It can't have any actual nudity in it.
Good idea or bad idea?
Well, my point is that the word surely has to be something that could be possibly conceived as sexual (ie a banana)
Now, anyone could type in Banana and Sex or v****a in Google and find a picture of a naked person with a banana.
Therefore, there's no difficulty.
However, I believe that if we remove the use of actual sex, it become a bit more challenging.
See my point?
Then people would try and use items that would never have anything sexual oriented about them.
Like, oh, i dunno, a shoe.
Then we'd all be ******** you don't agree, say so, and I will include nudity in the contest, on the grounds that I wil be the one supplying the item for the week.
This weeks item is...
A can of baked beans.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:56 am
You don't need nudity, and I'm pretty sure you can find shoe porn anyway. *mod mode* This site is PG13, so no porno posted...ugh, I feel so dirty gonk
What's the word then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 4:53 am
Bizarre... idea...
I like it ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 6:23 am
Sounds good to me, it reminds me of the MK thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 10:22 am
Kit-kun You don't need nudity, and I'm pretty sure you can find shoe porn anyway. *mod mode* This site is PG13, so no porno posted...ugh, I feel so dirty gonk What's the word then? A can of baked beans. Go nuts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:34 am
I tried. I failed. Does it have to be a can?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:51 am
Szinriia I tried. I failed. Does it have to be a can? No, naked beans will be fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 10:21 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 10:31 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 11:38 am
This is so retarded.
Hmm.
Hmm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
