|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:06 pm
Who came first the chicken or the egg? confused
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:00 am
single celled organisms, that evoloved into birds.
That then started to give birth via having a protective membrain around the child.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 10:02 am
Darkfist007 single celled organisms, that evoloved into birds. That then started to give birth via having a protective membrain around the child. I fully support this explanation!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 12:24 pm
lol! blaugh you guys are funny!! blaugh blaugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 2:06 pm
i dont know.i dont care.chickens are here and will one day rule the world with iron fist things.besides that question makes my brain think and i hate taht xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 2:21 am
I'd say the egg anyways. Dinosaurs layed eggs before the chicken and the question does not spesify that the egg is a chicken egg....
but I gree fully whit darkfist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 6:51 pm
Enlightened Ghost I'd say the egg anyways. Dinosaurs layed eggs before the chicken and the question does not spesify that the egg is a chicken egg.... but I gree fully whit darkfist "yo mama." ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 10:52 pm
the chicken came first cause an atom that was somehow magically created split and began to create the universe and continued to split.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:24 am
the chicken is just another way for eggs to duplicate themselves... the egg of course! lol ^'^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 7:17 am
but the mom chicken has to protect the egg....same thing with the dinosaur....it has to stay warm...chicken
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 10:33 am
i think i said it different in my head compared to what i actually wrote. okay this makes more sence. an egg is just the chickens way of duplicating itself. ya that makes much more sence. thank you to whoever said that. ^'^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 5:59 pm
Don't know, don't care. I don't eat eggs and chickens freak me out. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 6:28 pm
First, I'm going to say we're talking about a chicken egg when we say the egg.
Second, that leaves the question of whether a "chicken egg" means an egg a chicken laid or an egg that is theoretically capable of developing into a chicken.
If we take the first explanation, the chicken did because the change from ancestor-of-chicken to chicken would happen somewhere between the parent and the child - therefore there would be a parent that wasn't quite a chicken yet, that laid an egg, and that egg became a chicken, and only when that chicken laid an egg would there be a chicken egg.
If we take the second explanation, the egg came first, using the same reasoning.
Basically, I don't know. I guess it's a matter of opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 7:52 pm
Darkfist007 single celled organisms, that evoloved into birds. That then started to give birth via having a protective membrain around the child.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
