|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 4:03 pm
On a scale from 0(lowest) to 100(highest), rate actors/actresses from your favorite show, smallville! You can rate the actors/actresses on their acting,hot-ness, character's personality, or anything else you can think of!
*Sorry if this is a repeat thread!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 4:48 pm
Um....100 for all of the actors/actresses. Idk, I guess it is cause I have grown accustom to them being the characters I love so seeing them falter is hard to invision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 5:56 pm
Chloe- 100
Clark- 100
Lex-100
Lana-50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:19 pm
uh idk what do u mean by acting>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:02 am
Thanks Chloe. stare Just kidding, I know why you hate her. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:38 pm
chole what are you judging on?
zach, by acting i mean how they play their character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:06 pm
Isn't that the same thing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:47 pm
SaberFireTiger Isn't that the same thing? What's the same thing? What i said acting was? if it is that then yeah it is the same thing. lol rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:29 pm
clueless-in-the-forest chole what are you judging on? zach, by acting i mean how they play their character. i was just kind of following Lana's lead. I was basically rating them overall. But i can do it by individuals. I mean you cna't really put a rating on Chloe, Her character is being played for the first time, and this is the first portrayal OF her character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:19 pm
Well you could technically rate her - Allison Mack is still a really good actress though so she'd probably still score really highly by most people nonetheless. One of the main reasons why I like Chloe's character so much is because her characterization seems so much more complex and profound. Sure Clark, Lois, Lana and the rest are awesome, overall or in particular but Chloe's special. I think it's probably because she's new that the writers can give her all sorts of stories while the others are limited more so to the history of the Superman lore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 2:51 pm
Oh yeah of course yu can rate Allison Mack as an actor, but im talking to the extent of how she potray's the character. I mean thats what im talking about, other people have playde Clark Kent, Lana Lang, Lois Lang, Lex Luthor, etc. But not Chloe, so what im saying basically is that you can't rate the actor really on how well she plays the character in that sense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 11:59 am
i see what you mean. to me though tom welling is superman, erica durance is lois lana etc. the reason im not like jumping of my chair to see the superman movie is because in my eyes tom wellign is superman. its just werid to me to see anyone else play that part-.-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:09 pm
Ratings based on viewer (or rather, my) likeability of the character:
Clark-100
Chloe-100
Lex-75
Lois-80
Lana-55
Martha-75
Lionel-85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 1:46 pm
I wonder what this survey would be like in season two; Lana's head would still be connected instead of being chopped off by everyone like now. stare *sigh*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:41 pm
chloe-90
lana-85
lois-90
clark-90
martha-80
lex-80
lionel-80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
