|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 4:30 pm
Quote: I'm 15, by the way, and "bisexual" or any word so far doesn't seem to fit. I know this sounds odd, but absolutely no words describe it well enough for me to name it, so here it is, more or less: Emotional Attraction to: All genders Sexual Attraction to: All genders, not as important, while attractions (if they appear) can be strong Willingness to have sex: None. The attraction's there but it means nothing. I've only felt like I could once. Amount of time sex is thought of: Rarely ever Comfortableness with nudity: None Chance of being emotionally attached: High I would describe it as the attraction is there but the desire isn't.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:37 pm
Labels can help us to describe our sexual orientation more easily and concisely, but not everyone finds that they fit under any one specific term. From what you've described, perhaps you may identify with pansexual? Or possibly as panromantic, meaning that you'd be interested in a romantic relationship but not a sexual one. You get to choose how you identify yourself, though. Labels are defined by us, and not the other way around. smile
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual Elocutionist
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:44 pm
I mean, you're always welcome to label yourself however you want (or not label yourself at all)... but some options, maybe:
bi/panromantic demisexual bi/panromantic grey-A bi/pansexual with low sex drive
?
Just thinking out loud mostly. Whatever you feel comfortable with, go with that.
And you know, there's nothing wrong with just being generically queer, either!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:22 pm
I'd say possibly panromantic asexual considering the lack of interest towards the sex act itself. But if there is a chance, albeit a very small chance, perhaps panromantic demisexual?
It's really up to you.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:38 am
sylasnstorm Quote: I'm 15, by the way, and "bisexual" or any word so far doesn't seem to fit. I know this sounds odd, but absolutely no words describe it well enough for me to name it, so here it is, more or less: Emotional Attraction to: All genders Sexual Attraction to: All genders, not as important, while attractions (if they appear) can be strong Willingness to have sex: None. The attraction's there but it means nothing. I've only felt like I could once. Amount of time sex is thought of: Rarely ever Comfortableness with nudity: None Chance of being emotionally attached: High I would describe it as the attraction is there but the desire isn't. As someone mentioned before, Pansexual with romantic tendencies. Nothing is wrong with you buddy, I'm pan-romantic too with a tendency towards bisexuality
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:07 pm
Seems to be elements of asexuality, but also bi- or pan-romance. Don't let anyone else define you with labels, choose one yourself. :p Don't be afraid even if it's an odd one. If it fits, use it. For an example of an "odd" one, the label I use for myself: Bi-romantic heterosexual.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|