Welcome to Gaia! ::

The Hebrew and Greek scriptures really do expose the deceptions we're facing today.

The NWO will live by Lucifer's fallen creation's principles of self-worship/do what's right in your own eyes; what our ancestors called fallen angels and demons in the past is what we call "aliens" or "ET's" today. It's an area I will continue to study and I hope everyone else gives it a fair chance too.

Let me rephrase for clarity's sake: not Lucifer but the fallen angel that wanted to usurp YHWH's authority and sit on his throne; I'm also not referring to the evil spirits that are sent to test humankind (ha-Satan).

I do not know the name of the fallen being that tried to usurp YHWH's authority, but he exists; he's all about rebellion against YHWH and worshiping self.

As for your statement that there is no "angel" that goes by that name, I think Jehovah's witnesses would disagree with you; they believe Yeshua was a messenger/angel and he is referenced as lucifer at least once.

edit: like I said, I'm not referring to ha-Satan.

The angels rebelling/falling from their position:



What awaits those entities for what they did (obviously they weren't in a state of obedience):



Which correlates with what the Book of Enoch describes in Chapter 6 (The Fall of the Angels): http://sacred-texts.com/bib/boe/boe009.htm and in Genesis 6.

Apparently, their leader is Sêmîazâz/Semyaza.



edit:

This is what I'm referring to when I say Jesus is called lucifer:

Is there a reason you are making a distinction between "fall" and "perversion"?
Is the fall of mankind any different? It was a perversion of his purpose for the human race. YHWH didn't create us to usurp his authority.



Well now that we know his name, it's referring to Shemyaza and his fallen angels. I'm aware of that. It's a separation for choosing to disobey him and not wanting to be under his authority.



Canon or not, Yeshua referred to it and gave John a vision that correlates with the same vision Ezekiel received about the New Heavens and the New Earth (also the same vision Isaiah received). Have you actually read the book? or are you prejudging it and choosing to not even acknowledge it because it's been labeled apocrypha?

I thought I was specific: falling and perversion mean the same thing; it's choosing to operate outside of how you've been told to act, i.e. Adam and Eve eating the forbidden fruit, the angels leaving their positions. You're assigned something and you don't deviate. What does their understanding have to do with anything?

Shemyaza turned from YHWH. He and the angels that rebelled with him swore an oath that they would leave their heavenly abode knowing full well what the consequences would be (again, according to the Book of Enoch, if you wish to disregard it, your choice; but I think it's true).

Just because it's in the Old Testament does not mean Christians should disregard it; otherwise, that means we also have to scrap out the promises made to Abraham and his descendants, we have to ignore the flood account, the mass exodus, the ten plagues that came against pharaoh, all the prophecies that speak about the Messiah, the whole calendar that his people are given which prophetically speaks about the Messiah.

Christians are suppose to follow Yeshua; Yeshua validated Moses and the Prophets. He validates the "New Heaven and New Earth" prophecy which is detailed in both the Old and New Testaments (and in the Book of Enoch); John is shown the New Heaven and the New Earth in a vision (Rev 21) . The majority of Christendom does not crack open their bible, let alone study it. Are you going by majority opinion or by what the text actually says?

Honestly, it's seems like you're doing a little bit of both. sweatdrop