|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:19 am
As requested by Bruce Ganked Lee
Now I don't claim to know a lot about this. I sure have opinions on it, but those are no reflection on my school or my teacher. So no thinking that I was 'taught' to believe certain things. My teacher refuses to get involved in such nonsense anyway. However, I have mooched around and garnered various opinions on various things and have seen plenty for myself.
There must be hundreds of styles of Wing Chun. Yip Man had a number of students, and each he taught slightly differently - he did not teach them different THINGS, but he explained things in a different way to ensure men of differing levels of education could understand and to ensure the techniques were adjusted slightly in terms of body size and height (just the same way my teacher has to occasionally have me add a turn or a step to make the technique work, because I'm shorter. This does not mean that a turn or step is always necessary, see?)
Some students stayed for years, others for weeks, and rumour has it one was never there at all. They all taught Wing Chun as they knew it. Some were great. Others good. Some, it started to get a bit diluted. And then there were lineages not attached to Yip Man flourishing elsewhere.
Bruce Lee does a few weeks of Wing Chun and then runs off, making t famous. Now everyone's at it. One teacher is condemned by others as a liar when he doctors false photographs to show he trained with Yip Man, so he creates his own version of WC - Wing Tsun.
Wing Tsun IS different. There is not as much emphasis on sensitivity and some schools in Germany and other parts of Europe, where it is very popular, have come under fire for bullying and beating students. It is also home to a practise of making people cough up a lot of money - four figure sums - to see later forms and weapons forms. A very honorable grandmaster therefore went to Germany and showed all the forms for free, thus angering a lot of people who felt Wing Chun should be all about the money.
(I know this because I went to Germany to see a seminar, and chatted with many people. However I'm sure many people do succeed with Wing Tsun - but it does not have the sensitivity aspect of WC so it is therefore pretty much a style in itself. WC without the sensitivity is like Karate without kata.)
Another teacher claimed Yip Man woke him up every night at midnight to teach him the 'special secret wing chun' while spending his days teaching everyone else a false, inferior version. People have been rumoured to actually BELIEVE this nonsense although most are unimpressed.
When I was in China I got to see some of these discrepancies for myself.
1. A Chinese group who had students perform chum kiu (a form) as if it were a dance routine. They bobbed up and down in time to a beat and, during a part of the form where one steps forward three times before turning, they added little steps back and more bobs. You could have played a pop song over it and it would have looked funky, but damn, you couldn't learn anything martial from it.
2. Others performed forms with chunks of other forms added in to make them look funky. Siu Lim Tao? But that's boring! You just have to stand still! Let's add some kicks and some steps! Performing a basic guard position, nah, too bland, let's wave our arms around our heads three times first.
3. And then you had the jokes. A teacher who brought a couple of students with him had already embarrassed himself by leaping at another teacher and engaging him in what he believed to be chi sau, but instead waved his arms frantically around the other man. The other guy completely pwned him at chi sau and everyone else raised an eyebrow. When this guy was required to perform his forms in front of everyone, we all shuddered. It was as if they were watching it on DVD in front of them and were copying along for the first time.
---
So; the lineages wars are there because people think WC needs 'improving' either by removal of chunks, addition of dancing or the inventing of tall tales. Or they do not trust in its ability to mould around an opponent - some sifus insist one fights in the pigeon-toed training stance with one hand chambered. Some sifus believe WC is a fitness and health art, like yin tai chi, and we should all just practise our forms and get along with one another.
"I don't do elbow strikes in my class!" one softy declared, "And we don't do body shots either. Or head shots."
"Why are you wearing body armour then?" I asked a female student.
"We wear it so the boys don't ruin their techniques by not wanting to hit us," she said, "They don't like hitting our chests without them. So we wear them for the boys."
"BULLSHIDO!" I pointed at her. No I didn't. But I really wanted to. What a n icon for women in martial arts, eh? I wear armour so the boys can improve.
So the fitness-guys fight the fighting guys, who fight the WT guys for having no flow, who fight the WC guys for getting everything for free, and the WC guys fight the guys who added or took away from the forms Yip Man recorded on 8mm film - why?
Because he was worried someone would start to change them, add bits, take bits away or claim they knew special versions. Despite the fact he was dying of cancer, he made his sons film him performing all the forms. He died two weeks after.
That's that, then smile And again - all my view, all my opinion, nothing to do with me or mine.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 pm
Here is what I was told more or less Yip Man had two teachers Leung Bik the last one he learnd from new the real Wing Chun style and tought this to Yip Man along with the story of the modified version don't care if its true or not but he suposidly kept the traditional style a secret and later tought William Cheung he is the one mentioned above who claimes to have learnd at night. He was asked to never talk about it unless he was dead which means he was ether lieing or Yip diden't want people mad at him ether way that knowledg is lost hes gone now.
I was told Bruce was introdused to Yip by William Cheung and that bruce was not happy with some of the older student because they rarly traind and were always acting superior so he showd them that he was better they got mad and beged Yip to get rid of him. It didn't work and later he was forced by his students to tell him to leave I was told Yip had a problem with mony and so his students kept his mony for him and payed him when he needed it also they found out Bruce's mom was half german or something and due to the chinese view on teaching foreigners he was asked to leave.
In william Cheungs book my life with wing chun he said that he showed bruce things behind every ones back and if I remeber corectly Yip said it was ok. From what he said in the book Bruce was very good at spoting things in the system that were not very well designed and would change things this is one of the times he talked about the night training he was doing with Yip Man. Bruce felt that it wasent right and chainged it William did as he was asked and never told Bruce the truth about the traditional Wing Chun any way all you can do is take his word for it I have met William Cheung once for a two day class and again later if he lied I don't realy care. My Sifu has traind in what we call the modified style I think its the one Leung Ting teaches and he said that William Cheungs is alot more efective.
There is a video of Emin Boztepe roling around on the ground with William Cheung and is suposed to show that Cheung was beaten but it looks like crap it shows nothing of the begining or end of it and if they are acting like that they are fools I have seen some of Emin Boztepe's videos on the net and I think it was good I have nothing against him but I think that video is fishy and from what I heard Emin no longer follows Leung Ting I say throw them all in the ring and see what hapens I am tired of the crap I hear I woldent be suprised if Yip Man is some where in Europe with how many times he has rolled over in his grave at how dumb his student are being.
A few guys in my class have told me they Chi Saued with a few other Wing Chun people and beat them easy by just useing our basic foot work I was told that they were shoked at how they just couldent figure out how they got out of the way of things. We use side steps such as the T step where you just move from a neutral stance to one where one foot is behind the other forming a T geting out of the way of an attack. They don't learn that is what I was told and I was told that most of the Wing Chun schools are of the modified style they lean back pigon toed and normaly have ther Wu Sao's lower they lack the side steps and some parts of the form are messed up like on Biu Gee the finger thrusts are strikes they thrust out but if you see them do it they keep there hand in one place and than point the fingers up and down without the thrust I was looking on the net and heard dim mak or the use of pressure points is not part of wing chun that William Cheung just threw them in but if thats true than what are the finger thrusting moves aimed at. I wouldent dout that he later learnd more about it and added stuff but finger strikes in all styles are used to hit a weak point on the body.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:55 am
There is obviously going to be bias and loyalty to one's own teacher.
But do you truly believe Yip Man spent all his time teaching people, including his own sons, an inferior version while selecting one person to teach the real one too?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:34 am
Aithne There is obviously going to be bias and loyalty to one's own teacher. But do you truly believe Yip Man spent all his time teaching people, including his own sons, an inferior version while selecting one person to teach the real one too? Well, stranger things have happened. But I do agree, it seems very unlikely that Yip Man would teach an inferior style to his only sons.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:17 am
William Cheung got pwned by Emin Boztepe(sp?)....that was funny not because he got pwned...but because they both suck at ground fighting.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:22 am
Oh and very informative posts, people. My dad claims that he trained wing chun under some monk in Saigon, Viet Nam. For all I know(and its very likely) my dad is full of s**t on that...as he likes to tell stories. He did, however, seem to have some knowledge of how to use the butterfly swords which I know are a part of wing chun's weapon techniques. I don't know if this is from another style he might have picked up, or from wing chun. That style was quite popular in 'Nam before the commy take over, though.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:56 pm
There is indeed an whole batch of Wing Chunness flowing through Vietnam. Seeing as no one has any idea who invented WC, why or when, there are probably only legends as to how it got there as well. I only found out about Vietnamese WC a few months ago and haven't had time to research.
Emin Boztepe is pretty... bullshido. There's no other word for him. He got thrown out of the Leung Ting group, and Leung Ting is the Grandmaster of Bullshido... Boztepe has declared himself MMA only now.
I recall in Germany a couple years back and there was a Boztepe school on every street corner. It was insane.
I've seen the fight video. I think they were both having very bad days, which, considering I don't have much respect for either of them, isn't saying much.
(No offence Wolf, but I'm not a Cheung fan. That be that ^^)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:18 pm
I heard Emin attacked William Cheung from behind and that at the time Emin was just starting out in wing chun but that emin has a backgroung in ground fighting I don't realy know but I also heard they leard Cheung to that place he didn't know what was up. Any way I realy don't like Leung Ting he looks and sounds like an idiot William Cheung may be lieing but I don't see him much and never realy talked to him much all I can say is that my Sifu is cool he traind in to forms of wing chun and chose to stick with this one and I know hes not in it for the money we barly get by with the building rent. I wish I had the time and money to go see other masters so I can see for my self I have found a few places on line where there were wing chun people doing the same things I have learnd but most are doing the toes pointed in thing that we don't do. I just thought I would write this its out of Cheungs book if any one is wanting to know it. Leung bik accepted Yip Man as his desciple and made Yip Man take an oath not to reveal what he was about to learn to anyone until his master Leung Bik's death. Leung Bik explained that Chan Wah Shun had been decived and that what he had learnd was specifically desined to be inferior. Yip man masterd the new stuff he was tought in 2 years and left to Fatshan. Yip met weth eleven seniors of Chan Wah Shun to have a Chi Sao match. To his suprise Yip found he was far superior to each one. They thought he had mixed wing chun with something elss and called him a traitor. 
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 7:35 am
I'd love to see those 8mms.. or digital versions anyways
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:40 am
My teacher has some smile Saw some in Hong Kong too.
Different clips were given out to different students so they're dotted around.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 7:55 am
If you look on yahoo and type Yip Man in to the search bar and click video you can find a few of his videos showing the Siu Lim Tao form but I can't find any thing other than that and some dummy stuff.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 8:25 am
About the not being a Cheung fan I don't fully trust any one that includes William Cheung and all other stoodents under Yip Man I know what I am learning works and I don't care much about all the stuff that is said. I would like to know what the truth is but as long as it works thats what I realy care about I want to find more stuff on schools that don't come from our family the ones that did not come from Yip Man but I cant find much I have also been looking at some info on the styles that were used to creat Wing Chun but that is hard to figure out if I remeber corectly Crane style snake and White Eyebrow were three of the styles. I try to find info on the five elders and what styles they traind in and than look to see if I can find pics of those styles I have found some stuff in these styles that are the same as Wing Chun.
Pak Mei or White Eyebrow- Bak Mui one of the five
crane and snake was suposed to be the styles that Ng Mui knew but thats if she is a real person I have read that she may have been made up.
Here is some thing I found online.
Ng Mui Buddhist Nun Bak Mei White Eyebrow System Fung Do Dak White Tiger System Miu Hin Influenced Choy Li Fut System Jee Shin Seem Si Hung Gar System -------------------------------------- Family tree of the Yip Man style to the five elders going by our system http://www.cheungswingchun.ashop.com.au/UserFiles/150-Files/File/familytree.pdf
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:25 pm
The whole Ng Mui/Yim Wing Chun thing is a myth, debunked long ago. There is not one record, ever, of any Ng Mui.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:14 am
Aithne The whole Ng Mui/Yim Wing Chun thing is a myth, debunked long ago. There is not one record, ever, of any Ng Mui. I think it was some sort of alien with three arms and a leg thats my story.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:28 am
sweet, I'll have a look and see what I can find..
wolf3001 - on that diagram it has Russel Hill leading down from Bruce Hill, but Russel Hill seems to be a higher rank than Bruce Hill.. how is that possible?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|