|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:53 am
According to Series 5 an image of a weeping angel becomes a weeping angel. In the episode Blink from Series 3 Sally Sparrow provides approx. 5 pictures for the Doctor in her package. Assuming that one of the pictures is of the house the other 4 are of the angels. What if Sally caused the weeping angels all along? Does anybody else have any theories?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:58 am
That makes sense...but if they turn to rock why not get a hammer
Or put a mirror infront of them
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:23 am
A mirror actually makes some sense! I am not sure that a hammer will stop them from attacking you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:30 am
When they are frozen then you smash them to bits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:07 am
ever since Blink I wondered why you couldn't smash them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:21 am
Can't the bits move or something afterwards or the stone is impossible to destroy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:29 am
We know one way to kill them:
Throw them into a rip in reality
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 1:59 pm
Shadowlord9k We know one way to kill them: Throw them into a rip in reality well yeah if you want to do it that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 3:28 pm
Shadowlord9k We know one way to kill them: Throw them into a rip in reality Sadly not all of us have rips of reality laying around
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 7:54 pm
One question, after the Big Bang 2, what happened at the Crash of the Bysantian (or however it's spelt, I didn't pay attention to that) Look! It's a person turning into a pyrovile in fast forward!
-------> burning_eyes <--------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:22 pm
For some reason I thought that Sally's angels were weakened so they couldn't do that image of an angel becomes and angel thing, while the season 5 angels were full strength angels-- sort of like the way daleks vary in strength
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:06 pm
ezactron14 For some reason I thought that Sally's angels were weakened so they couldn't do that image of an angel becomes and angel thing, while the season 5 angels were full strength angels-- sort of like the way daleks vary in strength I don't think that matters. Because if it is possible for even drawings of weeping angels to come to life does it really matter who the weeping angel is? Also if the image theory is true would that not explain how the weeping angels were there in the first place?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:07 pm
No Duck Pond One question, after the Big Bang 2, what happened at the Crash of the Bysantian (or however it's spelt, I didn't pay attention to that) Maybe that is just one of those wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey things
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:38 pm
ezactron14 For some reason I thought that Sally's angels were weakened so they couldn't do that image of an angel becomes and angel thing, while the season 5 angels were full strength angels-- sort of like the way daleks vary in strength
If her pictures had spawned the Angels I think the Doctor would have know about the image thing already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:06 pm
Recca Hino ezactron14 For some reason I thought that Sally's angels were weakened so they couldn't do that image of an angel becomes and angel thing, while the season 5 angels were full strength angels-- sort of like the way daleks vary in strength
If her pictures had spawned the Angels I think the Doctor would have know about the image thing already.Didn't the Doctor figure out about the image thing in "Time of the Angels". I thought he wondered why there were no weeping angels in the book and he figured out why right then and there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
