|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:10 pm
Discuss.
All it supposedly does is make the game think you are taking 500 steps per step or something like that.
I don't personally do it, but do you consider it to be cheating?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:09 pm
I'd actually like to know if this impacts the coding of the Pokémon involved.
Personally, I don't own a cheating device, so this isn't an option for me.
It's a personal thing. I think it's cheating you out of the real experience if you partake in it, personally- it turns breeding from a labor of love into an impersonal assembly line.
I like to think that I've worked for the nearly perfect Pokémon I choose to keep and raise.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:12 pm
I say that anything that breaks the game code is cheating. And fast hatching is well, kinda cheating. But I don't fast hatch. I wait for 5 eggs to appear, take about 500 steps, and repeat.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:29 pm
KuraiKitty I'd actually like to know if this impacts the coding of the Pokémon involved.
Personally, I don't own a cheating device, so this isn't an option for me.
It's a personal thing. I think it's cheating you out of the real experience if you partake in it, personally- it turns breeding from a labor of love into an impersonal assembly line.
I like to think that I've worked for the nearly perfect Pokémon I choose to keep and raise. The only thing I use my action replay for is IV checking. I feel the same way. I just hatched my swinub the legit way and I do feel like I accomplished something. Tell me, do you go for exactly perfect 31 IVs?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:05 pm
31s across the board? No way. That's borderline impossible, unless you're extremely lucky.
...Granted, I used to do that. Try spending 40 hours breeding a single species, only to have your entire program torn apart when a jerk steals your DS. The closest I've gotten was four 31s; I haven't gotten that lucky for a while now.
---
I prioritize the stats I need, and breed accordingly.
For instance:
If I was going for an Espeon, I would breed Eevees until I got several Timid ones with 31s in their priority stats: Speed and Sp. Atk. Gather them together, as some should have three 31s by the time I breed for Natures, and continue inbreeding until I get the one I need. I also search for a 0- or close to it- in Atk.
...Why's that?
In my Special attackers and Special tanks, I aim to minimize the damage I take from Confusion recoil.
I generally aim for three 31s and at least 20s in other stats.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 6:36 am
KuraiKitty 31s across the board? No way. That's borderline impossible, unless you're extremely lucky. that there is false, i have manege to get 31 in all like 31 in 5 of the stats on several pokes by using high ived parents,, sure its a pain but its not impossible. like one of my previous pokes i traded 31/4/31/31/31/31
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:36 am
Albtraum Opfer KuraiKitty 31s across the board? No way. That's borderline impossible, unless you're extremely lucky. that there is false, i have manege to get 31 in all like 31 in 5 of the stats on several pokes by using high ived parents,, sure its a pain but its not impossible. like one of my previous pokes i traded 31/4/31/31/31/31 I don't mean to sound like an a-hole, but five stats still isn't all six. I'm sure you can testify how difficult it was to even obtain that, needless to tack another 31 IV onto that Pokemon. In either case, legitly obtained Pokemon with 31 IVs in all six stats are as rare as UFO sightings. If it wasn't, then there wouldn't be any use for AR or hacking Pokemon in general, since most who do such things usually defend thier reasoning with "lack of time" and/or laziness.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 10:57 am
Kyrenx I don't mean to sound like an a-hole, but five stats still isn't all six. I'm sure you can testify how difficult it was to even obtain that, needless to tack another 31 IV onto that Pokemon. In either case, legitly obtained Pokemon with 31 IVs in all six stats are as rare as UFO sightings. If it wasn't, then there wouldn't be any use for AR or hacking Pokemon in general, since most who do such things usually defend thier reasoning with "lack of time" and/or laziness. Couldn't have said it better, myself.
If someone came forward claiming that they naturally bred a Pokémon with 31s across the board, I would be more than a little skeptical. The imperfections are what make a competitive Pokémon plausible. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:04 pm
The most I have gotten (legally) was four 31 IVs on my Swinub. :s I can't imagine how time consuming/lucky it'd have to be to get straight 31s unless you RNG.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:48 pm
Kyrenx Albtraum Opfer KuraiKitty 31s across the board? No way. That's borderline impossible, unless you're extremely lucky. that there is false, i have manege to get 31 in all like 31 in 5 of the stats on several pokes by using high ived parents,, sure its a pain but its not impossible. like one of my previous pokes i traded 31/4/31/31/31/31 I don't mean to sound like an a-hole, but five stats still isn't all six. I'm sure you can testify how difficult it was to even obtain that, needless to tack another 31 IV onto that Pokemon. In either case, legitly obtained Pokemon with 31 IVs in all six stats are as rare as UFO sightings. If it wasn't, then there wouldn't be any use for AR or hacking Pokemon in general, since most who do such things usually defend thier reasoning with "lack of time" and/or laziness.oh sorry, i forgot to mention all the hundreds and hundreds of eggs i hatched for them. and yes maybe not all six but if the poke does not need the that one then its good. there any better? dont get worked up when you know it can be done.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:23 pm
Having a Pokemon with anything more than four 31 IVs is showing off anyways. 2 or 3 are about the standard. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:44 am
It's somewhat cheating since others work real hard to hatch it their own way......
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 4:28 pm
Kyrenx Having a Pokemon with anything more than four 31 IVs is showing off anyways. 2 or 3 are about the standard. xd Is that what you go for? 3 31 IVs and the rest above 20? That's what I seem to hear is the standard.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:42 am
Personally, I don't see what's so wrong about using a quick egg hatch cheat to hatch an egg faster. If it alters a pokemon's code [post egg hatch] then I can see the issue. But as for the simple purpose of the cheat itself, big deal. "Taking the work out of it" doesn't resonate well when it is not difficult at all to ride back and forth between routes repeatedly to hatch eggs. To me the real work is the part where you know, you actually breed the IVs correctly, the natures, the egg moves, etc. But if riding a bike up and down a lot gives you pride and accomplishment then hey, more power to you. I just disagree that this particular step in the process is "hard work".
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|