|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 1:00 am
There's a new rap critic on thatguywiththeglasses website. We can yay him for bringing rap to the metal and rock heads on that site. As well as analyzing rap songs and giving new perspective on it. He's pretty much making the same complaints as most people against mainstream rap. And while I'll rather recommend Idollic1 on youtube. He is just as good and should be supported.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:12 pm
What's to really review about mainstream rap? It's commercial and is just around to dumb everyone down. Seems like a major waste of time. Now if it was about underground or real hip-hop then okay. But commercial rap isn't even an art thus no need to too even wast time reviewing it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 6:42 pm
Princess Z-M What's to really review about mainstream rap? It's commercial and is just around to dumb everyone down. Seems like a major waste of time. Now if it was about underground or real hip-hop then okay. But commercial rap isn't even an art thus no need to too even wast time reviewing it. Well that's an unfair statement I never expected to hear. Just because someone doesn't like it doesn't mean it's not art. It may not be an art that had as many supporters as it had before. But it is an art none the less that effects many countries and people. And to say it itself is or has dumbed down people I have to disagree with. Yes I do believe that mainstream has caused rappers to dumb down their lyrics and censor them when the money see's fit. But again I support that the mainstream has opened new voices and kinda broke color barriers that underground hasn't. So just like you cant lump people into one stereotype. You cant lump all mainstream artist into one big stereotype. Especially since it's trying to change from what it is now.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:12 am
You know, the thing about underground rap... is that anyone can do it.
There is no bar or qualification to be an underground rapper. There are really no standards when compared to mainstream rap which .. whether you realize it or not... has very strict standards. Marketability, Image, radio playability, relevance to current trends.. and so on.. and so forth.
This makes underground rap to being a lot shittier than people realize. Lack of standards. The beats that a lot of underground rappers use are weak. The rappers themselves are often dull and boring, and lack any sort of real entertainment value.
We've all been in a classroom and I think we can all agree that teaching methods are the biggest determining factor in whether or not you take gain significant knowledge and understanding of the subject at hand.
Consider this the next time you try to invoke the idea of "meaning" being the sole determining factor in whether or not something is hip hop or not.. or whether something is good or not.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:50 am
Mr Crawley You know, the thing about underground rap... is that anyone can do it. There is no bar or qualification to be an underground rapper. There are really no standards when compared to mainstream rap which .. whether you realize it or not... has very strict standards. Marketability, Image, radio playability, relevance to current trends.. and so on.. and so forth. This makes underground rap to being a lot shittier than people realize. Lack of standards. The beats that a lot of underground rappers use are weak. The rappers themselves are often dull and boring, and lack any sort of real entertainment value. We've all been in a classroom and I think we can all agree that teaching methods are the biggest determining factor in whether or not you take gain significant knowledge and understanding of the subject at hand. Consider this the next time you try to invoke the idea of "meaning" being the sole determining factor in whether or not something is hip hop or not.. or whether something is good or not. Okay I disagree because entertainment Value doesn't always equal good entertainment. And it's more easier to get into mainstream rap than underground rap. Especially since everything can auto tuned so quickly. You cant tell me Antone Dodson has good hip hop stage entertainment value. from one autotuned song that was a news report about his sisters attempted rape. Underground hip hop though has its flaws. But it doesn't have the easy access button that mainstream has. And it can become quite superficial than underground can. And again mainstream rap has been said by the people in it that it has made them dumbed themselves down and play into horrible stereotypes just to make quick money. Some of the rapper have english master degrees. But as the words of wakka flakka in mainstream a lyrical artist cant sell as much as a superficial playing into the system artist can. Plus it still has alot of problems such as not accepting gay rappers like underground has. Or female rappers that have to flaunt sex just to make it in. And I'm not saying that flaunting your knowledge about sex is bad. But if all a female rapper can say is I have sex 24 hours a day. Well it can make people sick of it. So you cant judge underground or call it shitty. I love underground and I like mainstream. Both are art in it's respectful places. But they both have flaws that they need to fix and grow better at.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 7:42 am
blakjapaneseangl-chan Okay I disagree because entertainment Value doesn't always equal good entertainment. And it's more easier to get into mainstream rap than underground rap. Especially since everything can auto tuned so quickly I didn't know Antoine Dodson's one random auto tuned song qualified as rap musicI would've thought it just qualified as a song. Novelty song, but still just another song. Second "... I disagree because entertainment value doesn't always equal good entertainment." Correction, lack of entertainment value doesn't equal good entertainment. Because if there is no entertainment value then no one will be entertained. Right? It only makes sense. Either something has a good amount of entertainment value or it doesn't. This may vary from person to person. The qualifications for being entertained may vary from person to person. But everything generally runs along the same line of whether or not something is entertaining. Example. A teacher can attempt to stimulate your mind, but if he or the information is not entertaining.. then you won't get much out of the interaction.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 7:43 am
And it isn't easier to get into mainstream rap. If that were true everyone would be in it.
But to be an underground rapper is very easy. All I have to do is put out a song and have it not be too popular.
I mean you can go on youtube and find a million underground rappers.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:45 am
Mr Crawley blakjapaneseangl-chan Okay I disagree because entertainment Value doesn't always equal good entertainment. And it's more easier to get into mainstream rap than underground rap. Especially since everything can auto tuned so quickly I didn't know Antoine Dodson's one random auto tuned song qualified as rap musicI would've thought it just qualified as a song. Novelty song, but still just another song. No it is considered a rap autoned song. That's why on youtube it's called the Antoine Dodson rap song. Mr Crawley Second "... I disagree because entertainment value doesn't always equal good entertainment." Correction, lack of entertainment value doesn't equal good entertainment. Because if there is no entertainment value then no one will be entertained. Right? It only makes sense. Either something has a good amount of entertainment value or it doesn't. This may vary from person to person. The qualifications for being entertained may vary from person to person. But everything generally runs along the same line of whether or not something is entertaining. Example. A teacher can attempt to stimulate your mind, but if he or the information is not entertaining.. then you won't get much out of the interaction. No you cant compare teaching to getting in the music business. At least with teaching you have to have some type of schooling. Even if you dont have the natural knack for it. In the music business it's whatever sells become it. Even if you dont support or you wont make money because no one will buy it and we can hide any imperfection under a machine voice. Entertainment value doesn't have to be good. A movie that offends people is not good entertainment value no matter who the small majority find it entertaining. And it should entertain the majority right which is to stimulate and advance itself. Not stay in one spot and ruin itself because it works for some people. It's like a comedian that tells the same jokes twenty different ways. And mainstream is just as easy to get into as I said. And it has more flaws. I am a big fan. But I wont piss on someone and tell them it's raining. That goes for both underground and mainstream. Underground isn't perfect. But it's something that acknowledges good styles and no that's not every joe with a youtube and sampled beat. people know good a bad underground artist like good mainstream artist.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 5:34 pm
Bad or good doesn't matter. My point is that it's easier to be an underground rapper because all you have to do is.. RAP.
You don't have to really expose yourself to anyone. You don't have to see anyone. You don't have to talk to anyone. You just have to put stuff out.
My cousin and brother are underground rappers. Because they rap. They have songs. But they have no radio play or any real exposure.
"Underground" and "mainstream" are STATUSES based upon EXPOSURE.
In order to BE mainstream you have to have a certain amount of exposure. And my point is that there are more people NOT getting that exposure than there are people getting that exposure.
You pointed out A. Dodson as an example. Dodson's case is rare. Name another time this year that has happened. Name something like that, that happened LAST year.
You say that makes it easier to be mainstream. No.. it doesn't, Being viral on the internet is one of those luck of the draw things. Does the internet have the power to give you overnight stardom? Sure it does. But how many rappers has that happened for? Not since Soulja Boi has there been another rapper to make his name based off one song on the internet.
And Soulja Boi is an actual rapper, someone who makes a living off doing songs and shows with his music.
Not someone who had a song made after them talking on the news and having it distorted, remixed, and such. Dodson did not make that. Two guys asked Dodson could they use his voice and image from the newscast to make a song to split the profits with 50/50.
Now did either of them know it was going to be as big as it is? No. Because it could just as easily gone the way of everything else on youtube. A quick laugh and on to the next video.
Just because the internet can create overnight celebrities doesn't mean it's easier to become a mainstream artist.
That's like saying because the lottery can make you a multi-millionaire in one night that it is easy to become a multi-millionaire.
Good or bad. The only qualifications for being an underground rapper is simply having limited exposure in the media.
So if you are rapping in your basement and you create a song (or multiple songs) Whether it sucks or it is the hottest thing since the crucifixion... you are underground. Until you a certain amount of constant exposure.. you will stay underground.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:10 pm
blakjapaneseangl-chan Princess Z-M What's to really review about mainstream rap? It's commercial and is just around to dumb everyone down. Seems like a major waste of time. Now if it was about underground or real hip-hop then okay. But commercial rap isn't even an art thus no need to too even wast time reviewing it. Well that's an unfair statement I never expected to hear. Just because someone doesn't like it doesn't mean it's not art. It may not be an art that had as many supporters as it had before. But it is an art none the less that effects many countries and people. And to say it itself is or has dumbed down people I have to disagree with. Yes I do believe that mainstream has caused rappers to dumb down their lyrics and censor them when the money see's fit. But again I support that the mainstream has opened new voices and kinda broke color barriers that underground hasn't. So just like you cant lump people into one stereotype. You cant lump all mainstream artist into one big stereotype. Especially since it's trying to change from what it is now. Youtube: The truth about Hip-hop, Then go to Hulu and look at the doc about Biggie and Tupac. I never say anything without thinking or reasearch. Yes ALL mainstream artist suck because that's what sells. Tell me how did we go to Rapper's delight to crap I can't even type out without hurting my head because it's not even proper ebonics!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:21 pm
Princess Z-M Tell me how did we go to Rapper's delight to crap I can't even type out without hurting my head because it's not even proper ebonics! Rappers Delight isn't even that great a song. It's an old and memorable song which makes it classic. But I could put it against a number of RECENT mainstream rappers stuff and it wont compare in terms of lyrical quality or overall song quality. Nostalgia is a load of bull. It glorifies days of the past that will never come around again as people try to justify their stubbornness to change.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:57 pm
Mr Crawley Princess Z-M Tell me how did we go to Rapper's delight to crap I can't even type out without hurting my head because it's not even proper ebonics! Rappers Delight isn't even that great a song. It's an old and memorable song which makes it classic. But I could put it against a number of RECENT mainstream rappers stuff and it wont compare in terms of lyrical quality or overall song quality. Nostalgia is a load of bull. It glorifies days of the past that will never come around again as people try to justify their stubbornness to change. At least it isn't demeaning to women, children, and homosexual which isn't much I can say for the BS that's out right now can we? Sorry if I'm one of those uppity Black folks that like music to either be playful nonsense or I don't know have some respect for people. Sure you can list me one of Mr. West or Jay-z recent BS song but how many swears will it have in it and what they hell are they really talking about?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 3:37 pm
Princess Z-M At least it isn't demeaning to women, children, and homosexual which isn't much I can say for the BS that's out right now can we? Sorry if I'm one of those uppity Black folks that like music to either be playful nonsense or I don't know have some respect for people. Sure you can list me one of Mr. West or Jay-z recent BS song but how many swears will it have in it and what they hell are they really talking about? Profanity has little to do with whether or not a song has substance. And they are talking about their lives or situations. among other things. You know.. like most people do in their records. And a lot of rap is playful nonsense now. Curse words or not. Excerpt from rappers delight ya go hotel motel whatcha gonna do today (say what) ya say im gonna get a fly girl gonna get some spankin drive off in a def oj everybody go, hotel motel holiday inn say if your girl starts actin up, then you take her friend Not much has changed. rock rock yall throw it on the floor im gonna freak ya here im gonna feak ya there im gonna move you outta this atmosphere cause im one of a kind and ill shock your mind ill put t-t-tickets in your behind i said 1-2-3-4, come on girls get on the floor a-come alive, yall a-gimme what ya got cause im guaranteed to make you rock i said 1-2-3-4 tell me wonder mike what are you waitin for?Not much has changed... well, im imp the dimp the ladies pimp the women fight for my delight but im the grandmaster with the three mcs that shock the house for the young ladies and when you come inside, into the front you do the freak, spank, and do the bump Again... not much has changed... i said by the way baby what's your name said i go by the name of lois lane and you could be my boyfiend you surely can just let me quit my boyfriend called superman i said he's a fairy i do suppoose flyin through the air in pantyhose he may be very sexy or even cute but he looks like a sucker in a blue and red suit i said you need a man who's got finesse and his whole name across his chest he may be able to fly all through the night but can he rock a party til the early light he cant satisfy you with his little worm but i can bust you out with my super sperm I mean have you actually listened to these lyrics? The only thing different about TODAY is that censorship is more relaxed which allows for cursing. at the age of seven i was rockin in heaven dontcha know i went off i got right on down to the beat you see gettin right on down makin all the girls just take of their clothes to the beat the beat to the double beat beat that makes you freak This whole "old school rap was innocent and respectful" mantra is complete bullshit. You can disrespect a woman without cursing. You can do it with sentences and a ego-driven mindset. And rap has always catered to ego-driven mindset. But I'm not doing that to say the song is trash. I'm doing it to point out that the same THEMES run true in rap today. Less censored? Yes.. but the name of the game hasn't changed at all.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:13 am
But that exposure is why it's so easy to get into mainstream rap than underground. All you have to do is make one song ego or party song and get as much exposure as possible good or bad. It's not about the music anymore it's about the person first. The brand and what next shenanigans and Hijinks they are going to do.
Underground isn't about exposure. Making music and getting it distributed is apart of it yes. Because people have to know you exist one way or another. You cant make a song a no one else hears it and call yourself a professional rapper. But underground isn't about exposure. Being a rapper especially underground is more than just making a song and having limited success. Because there are ton of underground rappers that have mainstream status like cypher and mainstream artist that do underground rap work like jay-z and mos def and even Eminem. There's more to being an underground rapper than that.
and Antoine Dodson is not the rare case. A lot of new rappers from Charles Hamilton, Fifty Tyson, Every hipster rap artist with the word kid in their names to even the rappers who made the Dougie dance have all been you tube Sensations turned mainstream artist. Even the chick who made can I smell your d**k is an mainstream rap artist. There is no rare case when it comes to people being discovered on you tube and becoming mainstream. It grows because that's where you find the people willing to work. Where you get the exposure and the more exposure the less it is really about music and the crappier the music gets. Sometimes it can be good.
Old school and underground rap dont have a lot of the problems that mainstream has. But as I said that doesn't make them perfect. They have their problems also.
Rap is not just about ego feeding which mainstream has turned tried to turn it into. But it still is more than that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|