|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:18 pm
Alright, I often frequent the ED threads, and when I go there to talk about abortion, or women's rights I usually get things said like "stop spelling women wrong, its women not womyn" I usually say my reasons for using a Y, and people are still pissed saying that I'm uneducated.
I would just like to know that I have some Gaian support in my use of WOMYN instead of WOMEN.
Here are some facts behind WOMYN:
Let's look first at the origins of the word "woman" itself. It comes from the Old English "wif-man," meaning "female human being." The male counterpart was "wer-man," or "male human being." Over time, the "wer" was lost and "man" (human being) became the accepted term for males. Men were the significant sex, while women were an adjunct, almost an afterthought. Men were simply human beings, but women had to be qualified.
In light of this, changing womEn to womYn allows women to separate themselves from men, to become individuals - whole entities who don't need qualification. It counters the assumption that men are the default sex. It allows women to celebrate their womanhood, to celebrate those aspects of themselves that are not shared by men and are often reduced, demeaned or simply overlooked by a patriarchal society.
Changing language is one of the clearest ways of challenging current social norms and morals. In making a statement against the people who enforce rigidity in language, women are making the same statement against the people who enforce rigidity in gender roles. In a patriarchal society, these people are typically men in both cases.
In this sense, womYn identifies women as feminists - and this isn't necessarily bad. These are women who are taking a stand against society. Maybe not in radical ways, but in small, individual ways, they are changing the system. Anyone who joins their ranks is taking a similar stand. Women who won't admit this are deluding themselves; you can't align yourself with a women's group and say you're not anti-establishment, anti-patriarchy, or pro-woman.
all of that information was found at imprint online
Also, I wanted to know if anybody would/already use the word WOMYN from now on.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:34 pm
I'm not sure how any educated individuals could call you uneducated. Those seem like excellent and well informed reasons for using that spelling.
I never really knew the story behind it until today. Your post is interesting and brings up some good points. It doesn't, however, move me to change my spelling. For me its still just spelling. No matter how I spell it, the word still has the same meaning.
Have you ever run into any trouble with teachers/proffessors over this? What was the out come?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:38 am
shadowycat I'm not sure how any educated individuals could call you uneducated. Those seem like excellent and well informed reasons for using that spelling. I never really knew the story behind it until today. Your post is interesting and brings up some good points. It doesn't, however, move me to change my spelling. For me its still just spelling. No matter how I spell it, the word still has the same meaning. Have you ever run into any trouble with teachers/proffessors over this? What was the out come? I had used womyn in an essay, and no points were deducted from my paper...it does give the word pretty much the same meaning, but it gives individuality, and independence. EDIT TO ADD: I like to think of womyn or wimin...any alternative spellings of "woman" as an alternative spelling. If I were to say colour in gaia, I might get a few "spell it right dumbass" comments, but if I say "that's the english way to spell it you americans" then I'd still be correct in my spelling, but they wouldn't really fully understand the reason why.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:16 pm
who ******** cares? using the word "woman" in the first place is tons more dignified than, for example, "broad," "chick," "babe," etc, and its connotation is not "HAHAH, AN INFERIOR!" rather, when one uses the word woman, it's usually in a respectable / formal manner. furthermore, the average american doesn't give a s**t about linguistic history, and furtherfurthermore, using "womyn" just seperates us more from men and pushes us further away from the ultimate goal of equality. if you care a lot, just don't use genders. call people a "person."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:59 am
Capn Smasher who ******** cares? using the word "woman" in the first place is tons more dignified than, for example, "broad," "chick," "babe," etc, and its connotation is not "HAHAH, AN INFERIOR!" rather, when one uses the word woman, it's usually in a respectable / formal manner. furthermore, the average american doesn't give a s**t about linguistic history, and furtherfurthermore, using "womyn" just seperates us more from men and pushes us further away from the ultimate goal of equality. if you care a lot, just don't use genders. call people a "person." I have heard the word woman being used as an inferior. My friend Sara was refered to as "woman" and not by her name as in "hey woman!" I have never heard the word woman used in any way other than inferior when refering to somebody. The linguistics history is to show that the origin is based on man being the default, and woman not being an independent word. The "ultimate goal" of feminism is not just equality. Its about a woman having control over their bodies, and being liberated. Equality is just part of the picture.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:33 pm
So do you spell our species human or humyn? What about female?
Your etymology argument almost negates your purpose; originally, we were all "men," and it was only a patriarchy that made males the norm. I don't change it to "womyn" because women should *not* separate themselves from men--for ******** sake, we're all one species, why should the language for two types of humans be that different? If women want to be treated the same as men, we shouldn't emphasize our differences. I'm also against psychological research into supposed innate gender/sex differences. Who cares? Let's just admit that the non-reproductive differences between men and women are negligible, so we can all be seen as humans!
Anyways, I kind of got off on a tangent...you can always use a different language, signori e signore, hommes et femmes...if your problem is with English, don't speak it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:34 pm
a stupid word is not keeping me from enjoying my gender or from being an individual. to say that it is would be to admit defeat to those who want to make me feel like i should feel inferior because of what i am called. i'm proud to be a ******** woman, regardless of the terminology used to label me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:47 pm
nygeel13 nygeel13 Let's look first at the origins of the word "woman" itself. It comes from the Old English "wif-man," meaning "female human being." The male counterpart was "wer-man," or "male human being." Over time, the "wer" was lost and "man" (human being) became the accepted term for males. If I were to say colour in gaia, I might get a few "spell it right dumbass" comments, but if I say "that's the english way to spell it you americans" then I'd still be correct in my spelling, but they wouldn't really fully understand the reason why. Ok we have an American teacher at our school (I'm a Brit) & she uses American words that are different versions of our words (ie Pants vs trousers) it doesn't matter because they mean the same thing!! In my opinion it shouldn't make any difference because anyone who cares enough about being an add on should have the sense to look up the meaning of the word to discover that the origins aren't meant in that way!!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:21 pm
that's cool; i never knew the reasoning behind it before.
i tend to err on the side of "a word is a word is a word". i definitely don't think that woman should be used derogatorily, as in "HEY WOMAN!". but i don't think we need to change its spelling to overcome that.
do you also support gender-neutral pronouns and stuff like that?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 6:34 pm
Capn Smasher a stupid word is not keeping me from enjoying my gender or from being an individual. to say that it is would be to admit defeat to those who want to make me feel like i should feel inferior because of what i am called. i'm proud to be a ******** woman, regardless of the terminology used to label me. AGREED. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 9:33 pm
Rebel Girl that's cool; i never knew the reasoning behind it before.
i tend to err on the side of "a word is a word is a word". i definitely don't think that woman should be used derogatorily, as in "HEY WOMAN!". but i don't think we need to change its spelling to overcome that.
do you also support gender-neutral pronouns and stuff like that? Yea, I try to use GNPs in labeling myself partially because some people don't know which one to use when refering to me. I also use them with pre-op trans...many ask to use one because they aren't sure if they're comfortable with either pronoun.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 3:53 pm
I think that although by spelling woman as womyn you are making a statement about your personal beliefs it is an ineffective way to make a statement because people just b***h about how you're spelling woman wrong. they don't actually think about why you are spelling it differently.
also i think it's kinda like we're separating ourselves from the majority of women, who don't care, and making us like a subspecies of women by using the term womyn. you know? like there's women and there's man-hating feminist arm-pit hair growing womyn which is something completely different. what i would like to see happen with the feminist movement is to change people's idea of what a woman can do and be. not limit ourselves to yet another label which can be as detrimental as it is empowering. woman means you are a human with mature female organs (for the most part... with the exception of transexuals) not that you are subserviant or inferior to men. i don't see any problem with using the word and i don't think that using womyn or other alternate spellings is all that great.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:05 pm
It's an interesting concept, but I don't think that I'll change my spelling of "woman" because it honestly doesn't bother me that much. I've never had the term woman used in a derogative way around me, and it seems like more of a silly elitist thing than a stand.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 8:52 am
If you push things to the limit, you could argue that WomYn includes a reference to the Y cromozone...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:44 pm
I'm definatly using Womyn now. We are different, however different does not mean inferior. If it did we'd both be inferior, men are different than womyn, womyn are different than men.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|