|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 4:53 pm
So we were discussing some "evidence" for the evolutionist, and one thing was that our DNA is like... 94% similar to apes. (I don't think that was the exact percent... I'll double check) then we said how we have SO MUCH DNA that 94% is a REALLY huge difference. like... massive. so it really doesn't matter.
The most interesting part? Banana's have 50% similar DNA to humans. xd so does that mean we're part banana? or that banana's are part human??
One more thing: I didn't really understand the science behind it, but Sandy (who was teaching us) was saying that similar DNA point to a common creator, because we need the similarities for us to be able to eat the food and use the nutriction etc.
yes. nuff ranting for today. ^^
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 4:58 pm
Also the evolutionist theory states everything practicly evolved from stardust
1)this makes them star worshipers
2)this means everytime they eat anything that they are being cannibalistic and to be a evolutionist humanitarian you'd have to cease to exist because it you died then you'd be causing earthworms to be cannibalistic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 5:04 pm
hm. thats funny too.
oh yea, I remember the creations lesson.. You can't be an Evolutionist Christian, (like, god can't have used evolution to create us) because:
-death is the driving force in Evolution. it's always there. all through time
-god says that death is the enemy, and will be destoyed
-death came because of adams sin. AFTER everything was made.
SO god did not use death to create us. I'm sure there was more stuff in that lesson, but thats the majority of what I retained. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 5:09 pm
Tessar hm. thats funny too.
oh yea, I remember the creations lesson.. You can't be an Evolutionist Christian, (like, god can't have used evolution to create us) because:
-death is the driving force in Evolution. it's always there. all through time
-god says that death is the enemy, and will be destoyed
-death came because of adams sin. AFTER everything was made.
SO god did not use death to create us. I'm sure there was more stuff in that lesson, but thats the majority of what I retained. sweatdrop Or you could say YHWH said he was a loving God thus by saying He used evolution you are spitting in His face and calling Him a liar. Which personally I don't think is too wise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 5:12 pm
Cradoc Tessar hm. thats funny too.
oh yea, I remember the creations lesson.. You can't be an Evolutionist Christian, (like, god can't have used evolution to create us) because:
-death is the driving force in Evolution. it's always there. all through time
-god says that death is the enemy, and will be destoyed
-death came because of adams sin. AFTER everything was made.
SO god did not use death to create us. I'm sure there was more stuff in that lesson, but thats the majority of what I retained. sweatdrop Or you could say YHWH said he was a loving God thus by saying He used evolution you are spitting in His face and calling Him a liar. Which personally I don't think is too wise. YHWH?
yea, that wouldn't be too clever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 5:21 pm
Tessar Cradoc Tessar hm. thats funny too.
oh yea, I remember the creations lesson.. You can't be an Evolutionist Christian, (like, god can't have used evolution to create us) because:
-death is the driving force in Evolution. it's always there. all through time
-god says that death is the enemy, and will be destoyed
-death came because of adams sin. AFTER everything was made.
SO god did not use death to create us. I'm sure there was more stuff in that lesson, but thats the majority of what I retained. sweatdrop Or you could say YHWH said he was a loving God thus by saying He used evolution you are spitting in His face and calling Him a liar. Which personally I don't think is too wise. YHWH?
yea, that wouldn't be too clever. YHWH is Gods Hebrew name for thousands of years it was hidden by pharises and priests who claimed it was blasphemy to say it aloud when the Bible says to do things in His name. This is were I think you get the phrase alot in music "your name is Holy" and such phrases because they couln't say it because it was too sacred but in doing so many people forgot about His name. p.s. His name means I Am I Was and I Always Will be (as a loose translation) and this is were you get the "I Am" in the Bible. There in the Hebrew version you'd see YHWH (pronounced Yah as in the "fa" from fa lalala and weh as in way so its Yahweh with vowels which the Hebrew language doesn't have.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:03 pm
If I am correct, and I'm just basing this off recollective knowledge, that flies have 1 less chromosome than humans do. I think humans have 46 and flies 45. I could be wrong, so call me out on it if I am. I remember this from freshman Pre-AP Biology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:09 pm
eek I wish I had the patience to be in Pre-Ap the only thing I study on my own is Creationism and the Bible sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 12:50 am
Cradoc...about your earlier post about cannibalism and stardust...
i will briefly play devil's advocate.
following that line of logic, wouldn't i be committing incest every time i kiss my girlfriend?
because, you know, we share common ancestry with adam and eve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:57 am
@ Cradoc: ah. interesting, never heard that before...
@ Raver Rouge: I think that's right... I remember someone mentioning something about flies being our "closest ancestor", therefore showing that evolution is kinda silly... we'd have evolved from flies. sweatdrop *shrug* thats all I remember...
@ Kichigai-han: yea, we talked about that too... I remember that since god made them, they were the first people, and they were... "pure". so, they didn't get diseases and things because there were none yet... um... *thinks* yea, and then later on some started, but there were lots of people by then. sweatdrop I have a terrible memory, but I hope that makes any logical sense... xP but technically, we're all related. ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 10:48 am
Kichigai-han Cradoc...about your earlier post about cannibalism and stardust... i will briefly play devil's advocate. following that line of logic, wouldn't i be committing incest every time i kiss my girlfriend? because, you know, we share common ancestry with adam and eve. oops almost edited your message eek that wouldn't be too nice of me now would it? now on that by Mosaic law its perfectly fine to marry distant cousins and such just no close relatives because it causes defects from the decay of our genes from the Curse of Sin no it wouldn't be wrong to kiss your gf. Though I know some realy conservative Christians who say you shouldn't realy kiss until your married and shouldn't make out in public at all. The wierd thing is their like 15-20 years old eek . This isn't bad just wierd and not Biblicly supported. That and they say P.O.D is a bad band because they had someone making out in one of their music videos and thus don't classify them as Christian band because they set a bad example. This is why I say I am a little bit Liberal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 10:50 am
Tessar @ Cradoc: ah. interesting, never heard that before...
@ Raver Rouge: I think that's right... I remember someone mentioning something about flies being our "closest ancestor", therefore showing that evolution is kinda silly... we'd have evolved from flies. sweatdrop *shrug* thats all I remember...
@ Kichigai-han: yea, we talked about that too... I remember that since god made them, they were the first people, and they were... "pure". so, they didn't get diseases and things because there were none yet... um... *thinks* yea, and then later on some started, but there were lots of people by then. sweatdrop I have a terrible memory, but I hope that makes any logical sense... xP but technically, we're all related. ^^ actually some scientist now say we evolved from frogs which kinda makes since if you look at their leg structure but how did our head change, how did we go from being amphibious to less amphibious, and how did we get these ever so useful opsoable thumbs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:51 am
Cradoc Tessar @ Cradoc: ah. interesting, never heard that before...
@ Raver Rouge: I think that's right... I remember someone mentioning something about flies being our "closest ancestor", therefore showing that evolution is kinda silly... we'd have evolved from flies. sweatdrop *shrug* thats all I remember...
@ Kichigai-han: yea, we talked about that too... I remember that since god made them, they were the first people, and they were... "pure". so, they didn't get diseases and things because there were none yet... um... *thinks* yea, and then later on some started, but there were lots of people by then. sweatdrop I have a terrible memory, but I hope that makes any logical sense... xP but technically, we're all related. ^^ actually some scientist now say we evolved from frogs which kinda makes since if you look at their leg structure but how did our head change, how did we go from being amphibious to less amphibious, and how did we get these ever so useful opsoable thumbs? yes, and where is this half frog-half human creature? because it would take years to transform, and obviously some would have fossilized since then. but there are none. problem solved ^^
(the evolutionists would probably say it's still out there, and we just haven't found it yet ^^)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:00 am
I've personally always had a hard time believing in evolution only to a degree. "POOF! AND WE WERE HERE!", I just have a hard time belieivng that, although I do see similiaritys between apes and humans that are sort of interesting at times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:49 pm
Cradoc Kichigai-han Cradoc...about your earlier post about cannibalism and stardust... i will briefly play devil's advocate. following that line of logic, wouldn't i be committing incest every time i kiss my girlfriend? because, you know, we share common ancestry with adam and eve. oops almost edited your message eek that wouldn't be too nice of me now would it? now on that by Mosaic law its perfectly fine to marry distant cousins and such just no close relatives because it causes defects from the decay of our genes from the Curse of Sin no it wouldn't be wrong to kiss your gf. Though I know some realy conservative Christians who say you shouldn't realy kiss until your married and shouldn't make out in public at all. The wierd thing is their like 15-20 years old eek . This isn't bad just wierd and not Biblicly supported. That and they say P.O.D is a bad band because they had someone making out in one of their music videos and thus don't classify them as Christian band because they set a bad example. This is why I say I am a little bit Liberal. lol then we won't let them conservative christians know what else i've been doing. yeah, i'm a 'liberal christian'. i interpret the bible very loosly in some aspects, and my forms of worship likely differ from all of yours just giving heads up 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
