|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 8:37 pm
He is injured right now. But do you think that is the reason for the Steelers games being not so good? What do you think would happen IF Tomlin made him a reciever? Do you think he is in football for the money or the fans?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 8:53 pm
iPodhuman2107 He is injured right now. But do you think that is the reason for the Steelers games being not so good? What do you think would happen IF Tomlin made him a reciever? Do you think he is in football for the money or the fans? 1.Yes we are garbage without him. 2.I think he would be good and our defense would suck, just like Dixon.... 3.He does not look like the type of guy to be in it for the money......p.s. I really wanted that win against the Ravens.....thats 3 losses in a ******** the world.... crying scream
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:35 pm
The ravens game was one of the games I wanted us to win the most, that was BULL we should of won, Dixon sucks keep Big Ben in and when he gets injured get someone besides Dixon but............... Palumalu is beast but we dont NEED him to win thats what they think and thats why they lose they need to think positive! HOW did we LOSE to the sucky RAIDERS!!!! evil
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:56 pm
It's just not the same without him crying
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:23 pm
-Sigh- The secondary looks bad...their only hope for a wildcard spot is to win every game from now on and beating the ravens
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:29 pm
I thjink polamalu is playing for passion...I've never seen someone so cheerful off the field and focused on the field
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:31 pm
....The Raiders..... crying crying , Oh well,I think we can still get the wild card if we win EVERY game from now on...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:33 pm
rio_kid I thjink polamalu is playing for passion...I've never seen someone so cheerful off the field and focused on the field I think he is ini it for the fans too but I think Ward might be a little more cheery than Polomolu. And if tomlin made him a reciever then the Steeler's defence would be terrible.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:34 pm
xXlildizzle1516Xx ....The Raiders..... crying crying , Oh well,I think we can still get the wild card if we win EVERY game from now on... I know right?! We have to win..it's a must win
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:37 pm
Bored_Hero_55 rio_kid I thjink polamalu is playing for passion...I've never seen someone so cheerful off the field and focused on the field I think he is ini it for the fans too but I think Ward might be a little more cheery than Polomolu. And if tomlin made him a reciever then the Steeler's defence would be terrible. haha...true that. We already have a fair set of wideouts...miller, ward and holmes...and upcoming stars such as spaeth and wallace
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 8:58 pm
welll..it's official...We NEED a miracle to get the WC
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 12:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:06 am
First off im a Ravens fan and without palumalu the steelers lose a playmaker. Just like Ed Reed for the Ravens. Man the worst part is that the Bengals beat both teams.....TWICE!! DAMN!! crying
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:12 pm
Mr Ronin Arp First off im a Ravens fan and without palumalu the steelers lose a playmaker. Just like Ed Reed for the Ravens. Man the worst part is that the Bengals beat both teams.....TWICE!! DAMN!! crying I honestly admire the ravens, the bengals are cocky ;-; the steelers need this win! or bye bye playoffs. Polamalu might play next week but for sure week 17 ;-;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:34 pm
booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|