|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 12:19 am
Not to be insulting, I think it's very cool that we let Pro-Choicers in as long as they play nice, but... I'm just wondering what's attracting all these Pro-Choicers to our guild. sweatdrop I mean, we aren't supposed to debate in here. That's what http://www.gaiaonline.com/guilds/index.php?guild_id=610 <--That guild's for. So why?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 12:42 am
They feel a need to attack and defend their 'territory'.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:05 am
I.Am Not to be insulting, I think it's very cool that we let Pro-Choicers in as long as they play nice, but... I'm just wondering what's attracting all these Pro-Choicers to our guild. sweatdrop I mean, we aren't supposed to debate in here. That's what http://www.gaiaonline.com/guilds/index.php?guild_id=610 <--That guild's for. So why? I have no idea. It's like as if those calendars you get in November in church are suddenly being ordered out by Bhuddists. I suppose I have no reason to not let them in but it's a very tricky situation. I'll let them inquire where they need to.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:01 am
Quote: EDIT: You can only be accpeted if you are pro-choice if you promise NOT to argue! We aren't around for the purpose of defending points. You can observe, and question, and throw in your doubts here and there but please do not ask to be in to "school" us or anything else that goes directly against the purpose of this guild. You don't say pro-choicers can not join you only ask us that we do not act like idiots. What's attracting Pro-Choicers is that there are Pro-Lifers here that can carry an intelligent conversation. Most people in the central thread seem to be announcing the same thing over and over again without anything to back it up except either something religious or rather rude. If you don't want Pro-Choicers here just say so and ban all of us from here.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:04 am
Master Kaiser They feel a need to attack and defend their 'territory'. excuse me but I find that quite rude. "They" is a generalized term that doesn't speak for each individual Pro-Choicer. Maybe if you quoted a pro-choicer saying "well I'm here because I'm going to defend this territory of mine to speak" but that is still only one person and not "They" but simply one person. "They feel a need to attack and defend their 'territory' " Maybe one person does but that doesn't mean you can completely interpret every pro-choicer and state what we're doing here and in such a manner that you're doing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:12 am
ka tana-bozu Quote: EDIT: You can only be accpeted if you are pro-choice if you promise NOT to argue! We aren't around for the purpose of defending points. You can observe, and question, and throw in your doubts here and there but please do not ask to be in to "school" us or anything else that goes directly against the purpose of this guild. You don't say pro-choicers can not join you only ask us that we do not act like idiots. What's attracting Pro-Choicers is that there are Pro-Lifers here that can carry an intelligent conversation. Most people in the central thread seem to be announcing the same thing over and over again without anything to back it up except either something religious or rather rude. If you don't want Pro-Choicers here just say so and ban all of us from here. We don't want to ban Pro-Choicers, though. I mean, we've had pro-choicers in here for awhile. But this isn't a place to debate. When prochoicers respect us, there isn't a problem. Afterall, McPhee was in here for ages and there wasn't a problem, and at the time he was prochoice. He was polite, respectful, but still posted his point of view. He never insulted anyone and he was always mindful that we deserved to be retreated with respect, not insults. It's quite enjoyable to have people give a different point of view. It isn't to enjoyable to be attacked in your own home, so to speak.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:19 am
Well, you're right that this isn't a debate guild. But if people like ka tana want to come in, spend time with us, learn our side, and not reject us completely, that's treating the pro-choice side with respect.
I think that says a lot about kindness. We're not trying to propagandize, we're trying to show that we're not religious anti-woman, anti-sex, nutcases who blow up clinics (which IS what a lot of pro-choice people think)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:54 am
Reasons why I believe pro-choicers come to this guild to debate: 1. The abortion debate guild for the most part is dead. 2. The pro-lifers in the ED thread are either inexperienced and don't know how to debate or are the religious type who base thier arguments on religion without any facts or proof. Most of us more experienced debaters tend to steer away from the ED thread for whatever reason(mine is that I'm sick of people violating debate ediquite and being flat out rude).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:31 am
ka tana-bozu Quote: EDIT: You can only be accpeted if you are pro-choice if you promise NOT to argue! We aren't around for the purpose of defending points. You can observe, and question, and throw in your doubts here and there but please do not ask to be in to "school" us or anything else that goes directly against the purpose of this guild. You don't say pro-choicers can not join you only ask us that we do not act like idiots. What's attracting Pro-Choicers is that there are Pro-Lifers here that can carry an intelligent conversation. Most people in the central thread seem to be announcing the same thing over and over again without anything to back it up except either something religious or rather rude. If you don't want Pro-Choicers here just say so and ban all of us from here. As I said, I'm not trying to be rude, and I have no problem with having Pro-Choicers here, I'm just wondering what is attracting the Pro-Choice side to join a Pro-Life group. And it doesn't say not to act like an idiot, it says not to argue. There's a difference. Debate is an argument, thus it also says no debate. If we allowed Pro-Choice v. Pro-Life debate in here, I would understand why Pro-Choicers come here; As other people have said, the debate guild is dead and the ED is full of n00bs. But we don't. Personally, I think that, if we really want well moderated debate, we should jump start the Debate guild, have moderators on both sides that are more active, and search more actively for members, rather then only advertising in either side's personal guilds. Because I can understand the desire for intelligent debate, but this isn't the place for it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:55 am
Mcphee Well, you're right that this isn't a debate guild. But if people like ka tana want to come in, spend time with us, learn our side, and not reject us completely, that's treating the pro-choice side with respect.
I think that says a lot about kindness. We're not trying to propagandize, we're trying to show that we're not religious anti-woman, anti-sex, nutcases who blow up clinics (which IS what a lot of pro-choice people think) You know I have no trouble with that. But when things get insulting, I get worried. There shouldn't be a need to get defensive in here.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:31 am
ka tana-bozu Master Kaiser They feel a need to attack and defend their 'territory'. excuse me but I find that quite rude. "They" is a generalized term that doesn't speak for each individual Pro-Choicer. Maybe if you quoted a pro-choicer saying "well I'm here because I'm going to defend this territory of mine to speak" but that is still only one person and not "They" but simply one person. "They feel a need to attack and defend their 'territory' " Maybe one person does but that doesn't mean you can completely interpret every pro-choicer and state what we're doing here and in such a manner that you're doing. I'm sorry but I stand by my statement. We are a side who wants conventional abortions illegalized, while pro-choice wishes for the option to be open. It's your territory. It's like king of the mountain. Abortions are legalized, meaning your king right now. We are trying to "knock you down" by disproving your points and arguments.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 12:05 pm
ka tana-bozu Quote: EDIT: You can only be accpeted if you are pro-choice if you promise NOT to argue! We aren't around for the purpose of defending points. You can observe, and question, and throw in your doubts here and there but please do not ask to be in to "school" us or anything else that goes directly against the purpose of this guild. You don't say pro-choicers can not join you only ask us that we do not act like idiots. What's attracting Pro-Choicers is that there are Pro-Lifers here that can carry an intelligent conversation. Most people in the central thread seem to be announcing the same thing over and over again without anything to back it up except either something religious or rather rude. If you don't want Pro-Choicers here just say so and ban all of us from here. So I noticed, i'm tired of the central thread. The debate gets nowhere and when some one disagrees with me they either are rude or insult me by calling me moron or something and in debates that is very unnescessary. At least in some guilds I don't get insulted.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:58 am
I don't think we should go on a mad "kick people out" rampage. But WHY are we letting so many in? Like yeah, I agree with the getting both sides thing, and letting choicers see our arguements thing, and making them think about intelligent arguements thing. But it's getting kind of annoying going into a thread and not knowing if it's a choicer who posted it and I should get my debating boots on, or if it's a lifer and I should get my critical thinking hat.
And then of course if it's a lifer who posted I have to wear both my hat AND my boots because there's a new choicer in the guild who had something to add and I'm all like "Whoa."
What ever happened them the emmarsary dealy?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 4:09 pm
ka tana-bozu Quote: EDIT: You can only be accpeted if you are pro-choice if you promise NOT to argue! We aren't around for the purpose of defending points. You can observe, and question, and throw in your doubts here and there but please do not ask to be in to "school" us or anything else that goes directly against the purpose of this guild. You don't say pro-choicers can not join you only ask us that we do not act like idiots. What's attracting Pro-Choicers is that there are Pro-Lifers here that can carry an intelligent conversation. Most people in the central thread seem to be announcing the same thing over and over again without anything to back it up except either something religious or rather rude. If you don't want Pro-Choicers here just say so and ban all of us from here. Huh? Hemm, I find that rather rude. Not to generalise, but, it seems to me that the Pro-Choicers are the ones who can't hold an intelligent debate, or much less not be rude to other people. Not us. Those women over there, each are famous for their own little thing. Some use CAPSLOCK a lot, all are snarky, all mock every Pro-Lifer they come accross, they call is idiots and then they get all touchy and it's like, "Oh my God they reported us oh no, we didn't do anything!", and all basically hate people. They make their own rules during their, "debates" which are more suited to a flaming session, (One of the most famous rules is that currently un-sentient life is worthless). Yes, that's what I said. Those Pro-Choicers at that thread hate people. At least, people who don't agree with them. I can tell when I read what they type that even when they're not typing something rude (it is most common when it snows in July), they still have much hate towards me or another Pro-Lifer. Then, you tell us that some of us - who I've yet to meet or see post on that horrible thread - are rude, and imply that some of us cannot debate intelligently? Those girls over there have never, ever supplied a source for me while in debates with me. Ever. Then they get touchy and say, "No that site's a lie site, it's BIASED and FAKE and the pictures aren't real, anyway!" without supplying any proof. I find that an unintelligent thing to do, and an even more stupid reaction to real pictures that just so happen to be of something that they support. So far, I've yet to see a 'stupid' Pro-Lifer, and it's rare when I run into a 'Choicer that is semi-friendly.
- Anyway, my opinion is that it's sort of an escape from their little house on haunted hill guild. I mean, if I were in a Pro-Life guild that constantly attacked Pro-Choicers, when there was a Pro-Choice guild that rarely did that and would accept and befriend me to a certain extent, I would join.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:30 pm
Actually, I have seen stupid Pro-Lifers in debate before; But they are rarely part of this guild.
It has happened... Though I am not going to name names. Even the guilty might be innocent by now.
Anyways, I like to think that for some of them it is to get away from that , but I'm pretty sure that isn't the reason for all of them.
For instance, I know there was a Pro-Choicer who hasn't posted in a while who was here specifically for that, and McPhee stayed here for a variation on that, but neither of them have started threads about how wrong we are, or for debate with us.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|