Welcome to Gaia! ::

Well it sounds pretty dumb but I think Ross wanted a buzz probably for pub/record sales and generally doesn't like 50. I can see why plus the mansion incident is kind of odd.

Some things 50 says makes it even more suspicious than a normal person. He thinks everything people do is a "business decision" and admires Bush for the war in Iraq strange reasons to me.

In the industry, no matter how much you look at it, it's pretty much based on competition and people are most likely to make decisions based on business or something personal, so therefor assuming that someone does something simply for business, because business is their goal is something that would make sense, the same could be said for personal stuff, mixed or seperate but of course you could be wrong about someone.

Of course not everyone in the industry is like that, not that working towards something or doing something personal is bad but when you step over people just for your own gain or deny someone credit or a job because you don't like them... not because they aren't capable or don't work enough (within reason and trust of course)... people can change or people can stay the same.

50 said so himself that he admires Bush because he sees himself in Bush in that they're both unpopular.

Honestly, I'm a fan of Bush's personality, I think some stuff he says is pretty funny. His decisions, not so much.

I'm leaning towards the house occupants being innocent due to the fact that who would burn the house that they were filing a lawsuit to have down and endanger themselves and their family just to get a house? Hmm I don't know though, it's possible for it to lean the other way too, would they get insurance?

You never know, maybe what goes in the front isn't always what goes in the back. The circumstances are pretty shady and a bit too coincidental. Maybe someone else did the dirty work, maybe they planned it, atleast knew something about it, maybe someone wanted the house (but why burn it and potentially endanger other people if that was the case? was there insurance?), maybe it was coincidental and completely different person or it was 50 (50 cent does kind of look suspicious). Reasonable doubt is often used when it comes to hold off on proving a crime, plus the oposite too. Evidence would be nice, but just because there isn't evidence, doesn't relieve or put someone in real guilt. The past is the past though, maybe one day we'll know.