|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:07 pm
If I had to choose five teams of where he would go to, I would guess...
Chicago - Follow Jay Cutler, plus that team is needy of receivers.
Dallas - needs some additions for Tony Romo if they're not fully confident in Roy Williams.
Miami - again, has no standout receiver there, may need one in order to stay up to date with their division.
Oakland - not entirely impossible. After the addition of Garcia, it seems like this team finally wants some talent.
New York Giants - Amani Toomer, Steve Smith, and Hakeem Nicks aren't exactly the best recievers out there.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:23 pm
He will go to...
Washington Oakland Chicago NYG Houston
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:48 pm
Denver needs a quarterback. Niners can trade Alex Smith. Lol. Reunite him with Nolan. xD
Now if that happened, the Niners would have a good number 1 in Marshall and a good wide receiver in Crabtree. Look out. =o
That would be cool.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 5:16 pm
Redskins, Bears, Jets, or Bengals. Maybe Browns.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 5:37 pm
Nyu-kun Denver needs a quarterback. Niners can trade Alex Smith. Lol. Reunite him with Nolan. xD Now if that happened, the Niners would have a good number 1 in Marshall and a good wide receiver in Crabtree. Look out. =o That would be cool. Denver does not need a QB. Something a lot of people do not understand is that Cutler is going to be only a tiny bit better than Orton was and Orton will be about as effective in Denver as Cutler was. Difference you ask? Difference is this. Orton is going to a team that knows what pass blocking is and can pull it off. Cutler is going to the opposite. Add two and two together, Orton will be more effective than Cutler is this year and Denver should not have much if any drop off than last year.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:08 pm
I hope he's go to The Chicago Bears!!!!!!!= Brandon Marshall
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:37 pm
i would say green bay or maimi thats two likely places but i think jacksonville and tampa could make a move
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:54 pm
it wud B real tight 2 see him on da Vikings Percy Harvin Adrian Peterson Bernard Berrian and den Brandon Marshall... haha dats alot of horse power
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:55 pm
yea... Packers been SILENT in da offseason drunkennmonkey33 i would say green bay or maimi thats two likely places but i think jacksonville and tampa could make a move
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:07 pm
Now I'm curious why you guys say Washington for a few reasons.
A) They haven't been quiet with their additions in the off-season if thats what makes these other guys think Green Bay.
B) Antwaan Randle El, Chris Cooley, and Santana Moss are already great threats on offense, why get Marshall?
C) They spent however much money on Haynesworth, got Orakpo, and tried to get two quarterbacks. They have not seemed to look for another WR.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:19 pm
TBC x CptCanada Now I'm curious why you guys say Washington for a few reasons.
A) They haven't been quiet with their additions in the off-season if thats what makes these other guys think Green Bay.
B) Antwaan Randle El, Chris Cooley, and Santana Moss are already great threats on offense, why get Marshall?
C) They spent however much money on Haynesworth, got Orakpo, and tried to get two quarterbacks. They have not seemed to look for another WR. Lol, same reason with the Bears? Bears haven't had that Quiet of an Off-season. They have Hester, Forte, Cutler, Davis, etc. on Offense as threats, and a pretty good Defense. They also gave to much up for Cutler. Lol, just about an even argument either way. So why the Redskins? The same reason why some think the Bears- It'd be cool to have him there. Especially seeing what Campbell could do with him.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:22 pm
i8th Wonder Of The World TBC x CptCanada Now I'm curious why you guys say Washington for a few reasons.
A) They haven't been quiet with their additions in the off-season if thats what makes these other guys think Green Bay.
B) Antwaan Randle El, Chris Cooley, and Santana Moss are already great threats on offense, why get Marshall?
C) They spent however much money on Haynesworth, got Orakpo, and tried to get two quarterbacks. They have not seemed to look for another WR. Lol, same reason with the Bears? Bears haven't had that Quiet of an Off-season. They have Hester, Forte, Cutler, Davis, etc. on Offense as threats, and a pretty good Defense. They also gave to much up for Cutler. Lol, just about an even argument either way. So why the Redskins? The same reason why some think the Bears- It'd be cool to have him there. Especially seeing what Campbell could do with him. True, and seeing how has management in DC hasn't seemed to have much confidence in Campbell this offseason, maybe some new toys would make Campbell a better overall QB. Nevermind on my argument, lol.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:00 pm
Hearing all tha bad things about his past. I think he shouldn't be picked up by no one. He jus needs to get his act right and he'll probably end up better than he is now. If i would have 2 say who would pick him up it would be a team that has had players that have cause their franchise to be criticized for having them like Dallas-Adam Pacman Jones Cincinnati-Various Players
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:53 am
Chicago Detriot Dallas Jacksonville Miami
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|