|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:37 pm
I severly doubt it. People are sexual by nature, were animals and I don't see any animals having trouble showing sexual attraction
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 7:11 pm
Well, it is possible for someone to be asexual, if that's what you would define as having no sexuality.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:06 pm
I'm not sure what you mean, but asexuality is a perfectly valid orientation. I know a couple of asexuals myself. It happens.
And you can't really argue that it's impossible by disposition/evolution, because while people are intended to be sexual, it's also likely that evolution "intended" for us all to be straight. Encourage reproduction and all that, wot?
Besides, most people say "I don't see any animals being gay," but on closer inspection, there is a pretty significant amount of homosexual/homoerotic behavior among animals.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 2:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 2:42 pm
kageling I'm not sure what you mean, but asexuality is a perfectly valid orientation. I know a couple of asexuals myself. It happens. And you can't really argue that it's impossible by disposition/evolution, because while people are intended to be sexual, it's also likely that evolution "intended" for us all to be straight. Encourage reproduction and all that, wot? Besides, most people say "I don't see any animals being gay," but on closer inspection, there is a pretty significant amount of homosexual/homoerotic behavior among animals. hell yea your awsome in the smart department
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 2:43 pm
holy poo i didnt know you go here...O.o i been a member...almost since the beginning...O.o i was a few weeks late though >,<
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:49 pm
angrygothdude kageling I'm not sure what you mean, but asexuality is a perfectly valid orientation. I know a couple of asexuals myself. It happens. And you can't really argue that it's impossible by disposition/evolution, because while people are intended to be sexual, it's also likely that evolution "intended" for us all to be straight. Encourage reproduction and all that, wot? Besides, most people say "I don't see any animals being gay," but on closer inspection, there is a pretty significant amount of homosexual/homoerotic behavior among animals. hell yea your awsome in the smart department Haha, thanks? ^___^"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 4:25 pm
asexuality is a type of preference, mainly the only people i know like that are really llogical, as in, nothing but logic is used. therefore emotion is useless hence the asexuality. so yes.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 5:41 pm
bad_omen123 asexuality is a type of preference, mainly the only people i know like that are really llogical, as in, nothing but logic is used. therefore emotion is useless hence the asexuality. so yes. Well, the two asexuals I know are fairly normal, emotionally. They just don't experience sexual attraction. It is entirely possible for asexuals to experience emotional attraction--they just don't want to act out that attraction in sexual ways. Besides, if what you're saying is true, these people will not be able to bond properly in a social setting. They'd have trouble making friendship, even, if they didn't experience (sufficient?) emotion.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:14 pm
I must be asexual. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:03 pm
I guess...nothing isn't impossible
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:29 pm
kageling Besides, most people say "I don't see any animals being gay," but on closer inspection, there is a pretty significant amount of homosexual/homoerotic behavior among animals.
He he. I have proof. My mother, father, sister, and I have all concluded that my female dog is really a bisexual male dog. She'll hump ANYTHING that moves. In particlular our younger female dog. So, the "no homosexuality among animals argument" I don't buy it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:18 am
can some one define sexuality for me...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:41 pm
angrygothdude can some one define sexuality for me... I believe he was referring to sexual orientation, which is best defined as "an enduring sexual attractions to members of (a) certain gender(s)." And also to sexuality in the sense of sexual attraction/arousal in general.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|