|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:06 am
So, I was taking a shower today, and was thinking. Then all of a sudden, it hit me, I came to a revelation. I have finally realized that the pivotal point of satanism/hedonism applies to everything.
The pivotal point of satanism/hedonism is only doing things that will get you something. Nothing is ever done because we get nothing in return, we always get something in return. We never do anything, unless we know we will get something in return. Some examples, a child wants a piece of candy and throws a temper tantrum becuase he thinks that will get him what he wants. He later realizes that, that will get him no where, and he comes to realize that if he acts good he can get that candy. So the next time he acts good, because he (thinks he) will get something in return.
A religion promises some kind of afterlife, and states that there are certain things that must be done to get to the desired afterlife. Christians for example, believe that to get to heaven they have to follow a certian set of morals. These morals include being kind to your fellow man, and other such things. Though you don't get paid in this life, you will (hopefully) attain the reward of heaven.
We only do something that will get us a desired result. If we want to get to heaven we do certain things. IF we want that candy we do certain things. Nothing in this life is ever done soley because it is good and right. Good and right are done because we will get some kind of reward.
Well, post your ideas, questions, or whatever.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:49 pm
What about aethiests that do something good? They have no reason to really do good. But they donate, do charity work, and get involved. They really don't get much in return, if anything.
Other than that, great theory! I see no other flaws. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:03 pm
xdarktigress What about aethiests that do something good? They have no reason to really do good. But they donate, do charity work, and get involved. They really don't get much in return, if anything. Other than that, great theory! I see no other flaws. 3nodding I thought about them too, and they do get something in return. They either get a good feeling of some kind, and in the end, they may be right, and that rightness is worth something. So, everyone gets something in return for what they do, and they do what they do to get that something, or to aviod something.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:06 pm
You don't always get a good feeling for doing the right thing. If everyone felt good about doing the right thing, it'd be easier to act good. But its not. If that were the case, there wouldn't be any violence in the world.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:12 pm
xdarktigress You don't always get a good feeling for doing the right thing. If everyone felt good about doing the right thing, it'd be easier to act good. But its not. If that were the case, there wouldn't be any violence in the world. Again, people only do what they do to get what they want. Some people want violence, so they commit violent acts. Some people get a good feeling from that stuff. Others get a good feeling from doing good, so they do good, because they want to keep that feeling. No one does anything to get the opposite of what they want. They always do things to get what they want.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:28 pm
I don't think people feel good about violence. They do it to get something, like you said. I doubt they'd just randomly say "Ooh!! A baby! Honey! Get my gun!" then kill it. It'd be more like "He owes me money..shooting that baby will make an example of him and make other people fear me..." But I don't think they go home thinking "*glee*! Shooting babies should be my new past time."
Not everyone gets a good feeling from doing good. Like, for instance..reporting a suicidal friend to the office to get her some help. You know that she hates the councelors, and that the counselors will only call her parents who will only scream at her for it. On the other hand you don't call, she might actually go through with it. So there you go..its a lose-lose situation. You either lose her life or you lose her friendship. So..you don't really gain anything. What do you avoid? You lose the friendship either way, you lose her trust if you tell, you lose the possibility of ever seeing her again anyways.. Some people report..some don't. It all comes down to doing what you think is the right thing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:54 pm
xdarktigress I don't think people feel good about violence. They do it to get something, like you said. I doubt they'd just randomly say "Ooh!! A baby! Honey! Get my gun!" then kill it. It'd be more like "He owes me money..shooting that baby will make an example of him and make other people fear me..." But I don't think they go home thinking "*glee*! Shooting babies should be my new past time." Some people actually do get joy out of violence. Quote: Not everyone gets a good feeling from doing good. Like, for instance..reporting a suicidal friend to the office to get her some help. You know that she hates the councelors, and that the counselors will only call her parents who will only scream at her for it. On the other hand you don't call, she might actually go through with it. So there you go..its a lose-lose situation. You either lose her life or you lose her friendship. So..you don't really gain anything. What do you avoid? You lose the friendship either way, you lose her trust if you tell, you lose the possibility of ever seeing her again anyways.. Some people report..some don't. It all comes down to doing what you think is the right thing. Actually, being suicidal, and having a few other friends who were suicidal as well, your suicide reporting isn't too accurate. Usually the suicidal friend is able to see their mistake of contemplating suicide. However, there are some cases were they do not. In reality your suicidal situation looks like this: 0% chance of having your friend (Suicide) >0% chance of having your friend back (Reporting of suicidal friend) which could get you the result you want? If you want your friend to live, you report them and have a >0% chance of them staying your friend. If you let them commit suicide you have a 0% chance of them staying your friend. I never said we always get what we want. We act in a way to have the possibility to get what we want. Look back at my child who wants candy example, you will see that I said "the next time he acts good, because he (thinks he) will get something in return." Notice the thinks part, he believes that this will have a better chance of getting him what he wants in the end. EDIT: Pleasure is a thing that is determined by the individual. What you find pleasureable is not neccesarily exactly the same as what I find pleasureable. In other words the definition of pleasure is relative.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:57 pm
Hmmm.. Perhaps. I shall have to ponder that. It just seems kinda sad that we all do something in order to get something, but..on the other hand, it doesn't surprise me. After all, humans are a pretty selfish and destructive speices of animal.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:22 am
xdarktigress Hmmm.. Perhaps. I shall have to ponder that. It just seems kinda sad that we all do something in order to get something, but..on the other hand, it doesn't surprise me. After all, humans are a pretty selfish and destructive speices of animal. It's not just humans that do this, all the other animals/organisms do this too.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:48 pm
Well that's a truley bleak way of looking at things. ^_^
It doesn't work to just say that every living thing does things only for it's own benefit (or at least because it gets something back). Comparing people who only think about themselves to people who donate to charities and things like that is like comparing parasites to the animals they infest.
I completley understand your point of view on this matter, and I also understand the fact that you're just musing about the whole thing, but a line does have to be drawn somewhere. A prince who kills his own brother to ensure that he gets to be king is not the same as a prince who graciously follows the rule of his brother as king.
Who cares about getting something out of it? Like you said, EVERY living thing does something because it gets something out of it. That doesn't mean everyone's selfish.
To your original point, when you mentioned Satanism, I'm pretty sure that when it is said that you should only do things that gets you someting, it means to do things that will benefit you. Whether this means helping or haming others in the process is left up to personal interpretation, but I know Satanism doesn't encourage anything like suicide or self-mutilation.
|
 |
 |
|
|
A Murder of Angels Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:11 pm
A Murder of Angels To your original point, when you mentioned Satanism, I'm pretty sure that when it is said that you should only do things that gets you someting, it means to do things that will benefit you. Whether this means helping or haming others in the process is left up to personal interpretation, but I know Satanism doesn't encourage anything like suicide or self-mutilation. When I say that you get something, I mean you get a benefit. No one does anything that will not better them. People may do things that do not benefit them in the short run, but it will benefit them in the long run, and vice versa. Nothing does anything that will not benefit itself. All humans (animals, and other organisms too) are selfish. Thats it. Your right Satanism doesn't encourage suicide, if I ever gave you that impression, I am sorry, it was not my intention. My intention was to say that one part of satanism holds true in everything. --- Now, on your prince and brother point: it is exactly the same. If the prince does not kill his brother, he has an increased chance of going to heaven. Now, if the prince kills his brother he gets to be king. The only difference is when the reward comes.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:40 am
"Be selfish. Do some chairty work, the rewards are great.
Go on, we know you want to wink "
hehe. I think your right. But it'd be part of our survival instinct wouldn't it? To be completly selfish in order for our personal survival to be sucessful?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:13 am
I absolutely agree with the idea that no action is done completely selflessly- there is a reward, or perceived reward for everything. Which rewards you hold in higher priority, that is your choice, and that is your religion.
If you value your friend's respect higher than her life (which would be true in some cultures, or at least ancient Japan,) then you do not report her. You must also take into account her reasons for being suicidal. If you seriously think she's justified, then that is what she must do.
I personally hold "reasons for suicide" as having to be pretty severe, and I'm assuming that everyone else does also.
But if you value your friend's life higher than her reasons for suicide, you must also factor in the anguish that not reporting her will cause you for the rest of your life. Personally, I would report her if reporting her was THE ONLY way to save her life, and I don't want to spend my life thinking about the girl that could've lived if I'd had the guts.
So I guess the statement has to be adjusted to: "No action is done completely selflessly- there is a reward, or perceived reward for everything, including the avoidance of pain or suffering."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 5:16 pm
Verim So I guess the statement has to be adjusted to: "No action is done completely selflessly- there is a reward, or perceived reward for everything, including the avoidance of pain or suffering." But, is not the avoidance of something a reward in a way?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:10 pm
chaoticpuppet Verim So I guess the statement has to be adjusted to: "No action is done completely selflessly- there is a reward, or perceived reward for everything, including the avoidance of pain or suffering." But, is not the avoidance of something a reward in a way? That's why I said including the avoidance of pain.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|