|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:46 pm
and this is why: "all people are Bisexual, especially us girls since we have both X and Y chromasomes.
having a frind who is the same gender as you makes you bisexual becausee if you didn't have feelings fo them then you wouldn't be friends XP"
........................................ le'gasp. someone failed biology!
and to further correct their horrible ideology! everyone has (for lack of a better word) "bisexual" impulses, but to be Bisexual you must act out your impulses on both genders.
I.E. you have no sexual preferance untill you have had SEX!!!!!!
*Facepalm*
(I refuse to give you the name of the idiot who posted this even though she diserves a good re-education through use of extreme force.
just go to the lifestyle forum and you will probably find the thread.)
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:02 pm
i made out with a girl before, but we didnt have sex, so does this make me bisexual, or am i still straight with certain impulses towards certain women? confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:16 pm
Plethora-of-Insanity i made out with a girl before, but we didnt have sex, so does this make me bisexual, or am i still straight with certain impulses towards certain women? confused the latter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:38 pm
I am not sure I would like to find such a post, no point in trying to set them straight, in the long run they will just assume you are trying to attack them and will fight back, I am conscious at how uneducated the post was, but I doubt that girl has much disposition to accept the errors on her post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:12 am
I am attracted to females. I am not attracted to males. I think that would make me straight.
Though according to that weird definition, the fact that I'm a virgin makes me asexual. That's... interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:45 pm
I think... I kind of... know what they were trying to say.
Because everyone has at least one X chromosome, we are all the same gender [maybe?] so it is all the same. That is a terrible argument, but I have read psychology papers explaining how by being capable of thinking that a person of the same gender is attractive, it makes someone bi. So yeah, that depends on how you define it all.
You know, the sex thing? Thats what one of my friends told me once. Well, s**t, I'm bi, and I lean towards the lesbian side most of the time. I'm still a virgin. I've still been with males. But having never had sex doesn't make my feelings any less valid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:21 am
Prophet of Tentaklos I am attracted to females. I am not attracted to males. I think that would make me straight. Though according to that weird definition, the fact that I'm a virgin makes me asexual. That's... interesting. Diddo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:21 pm
Wow asexual? Thats almost as bad as Mitosis
Imagine splitting apart uncontrollably rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:03 pm
Bisexual isn't having two different chromosomes. It means having sex with a bicycle, silly.
And since human DNA is about 99.95% similar between two humans, does that mean we're all incestuous?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:56 pm
If what most religious people around here say is true, then yes, it does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:26 pm
Draydrigo Bisexual isn't having two different chromosomes. It means having sex with a bicycle, silly.
And since human DNA is about 99.95% similar between two humans, does that mean we're all incestuous? I knew that Adam and Eve thing was a bad idea... -God
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 1:04 am
Tymbre If what most religious people around here say is true, then yes, it does.
It would most certainly explain all the retards constantly taking over stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:48 am
Yesterday in the Extended Discussion this kid was saying that "without religion people would be constantly shooting each other."
Someone didn't pay attention in History class.
neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:07 am
And as a matter of fact i would seriously say that nothing has caused more deaths in the history of men than religions, and even when it is not the primary reason like on the crusades, it usually takes a second seat but is used to fuel the gaps in philosophical speech, just like the christian wars of the last century.
Religion is usually used as a means of control, and I can understand this kid misguided view, but I also see how much deaths religions have caused, even more than any given sickness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:06 am
IvesRountree And as a matter of fact i would seriously say that nothing has caused more deaths in the history of men than religions, and even when it is not the primary reason like on the crusades, it usually takes a second seat but is used to fuel the gaps in philosophical speech, just like the christian wars of the last century. Religion is usually used as a means of control, and I can understand this kid misguided view, but I also see how much deaths religions have caused, even more than any given sickness. Amen brother! (pun intended)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
