|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 9:46 pm
Again, I catch thirty-one flavors of s**t for suggesting this, but are a lot of pro-choicers just kind of...well...retarded?
Seriously. The debate isn't even about whether abortion is right or wrong anymore. It's over those heavily contested and controversial questions like "where do babies come from? Will people conceive children even if they don't have sex? Are human babies in human mothers parasites?"
I mean, seriously. I don't even think most of us are on the same page with regards to the subject of abortion. There isn't a ton of baseline knowledge people need to know about the issue, but not knowing it, and being antagonistic as a substitute for objective information, makes for a truly headdesking experience.
It's messed up, but a lot of people make "pro-choice" the default for "moral deficiency, apathetic regard for anyone but themselves, and terribly uninformed or misinformed about the subject."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:42 am
There are a lot of people like that; And the abortion thread tends to be that way, with lots of people who are just emotionally Pro-Choice (Or Pro-Life!) who don't have any facts or real information, but still feel strongly about their side, and go in there to harp at people from the other side.
And on Gaia, it tends to give the impression, especially to Pro-Lifers, that Pro-Choicers are all idiots, because there are a lot of Pro-Choicers on Gaia, and not a whole lot of Pro-Lifers.
Although, I find it interesting that a study in 2006 showed that 55% of Americans are what could be termed Pro-Life, if you include those that make an exception for rape and incest. And apparently 3% are undecided, as only 42% are definitively Pro-Choice. The internet just has a different balance because it seems that people who spend a lot of time online tend to be liberal.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:46 am
And, before, you "caught thirty-one flavors of s**t" because you were posting in the subforum, which is meant for Pro-Lifers and Pro-Choicers to get along and/or discuss abortion in a safe, friendly environment. Do you think a group for, I don't know, the discussion of drug rights, would or should stand for a post saying "Drug users are morons"?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:13 am
I.Am And, before, you "caught thirty-one flavors of s**t" because you were posting in the subforum, which is meant for Pro-Lifers and Pro-Choicers to get along and/or discuss abortion in a safe, friendly environment. Do you think a group for, I don't know, the discussion of drug rights, would or should stand for a post saying "Drug users are morons"? ninja BECAUSE OPINIONS ARE FACT BASED AND SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO FACTUAL SCRUTINY! ninja
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:38 am
I.Am There are a lot of people like that; And the abortion thread tends to be that way, with lots of people who are just emotionally Pro-Choice (Or Pro-Life!) who don't have any facts or real information, but still feel strongly about their side, and go in there to harp at people from the other side. And on Gaia, it tends to give the impression, especially to Pro-Lifers, that Pro-Choicers are all idiots, because there are a lot of Pro-Choicers on Gaia, and not a whole lot of Pro-Lifers. Although, I find it interesting that a study in 2006 showed that 55% of Americans are what could be termed Pro-Life, if you include those that make an exception for rape and incest. And apparently 3% are undecided, as only 42% are definitively Pro-Choice. The internet just has a different balance because it seems that people who spend a lot of time online tend to be liberal. Who are some people who are emotionally pro-life in the abortion thread? That have no facts or real information? Who thinks all pro-choicers are idiots? Quote: And, before, you "caught thirty-one flavors of s**t" because you were posting in the subforum, which is meant for Pro-Lifers and Pro-Choicers to get along and/or discuss abortion in a safe, friendly environment. Do you think a group for, I don't know, the discussion of drug rights, would or should stand for a post saying "Drug users are morons"? First of all, I wasn't referring to anything that went on in this forum. Second, "get along and/or discuss abortion in a safe, friendly environment"? "Drug users are morons"? The hell are you blathering about?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:32 pm
Samsare First of all, I wasn't referring to anything that went on in this forum. Second, "get along and/or discuss abortion in a safe, friendly environment"? "Drug users are morons"? The hell are you blathering about? You know, I'm pretty easy going as a general rule, but I think that, as a moderator of this forum, I deserve a little more respect than that. Are you going to claim that you aren't another Erasmas account, and that you didn't make a thread in the subforum called "Pro-Choicers are kind of, well, retarded?" A title that you quote nearly exactly in your posting of this, right after you said that you catch "thirty-one flavors of s**t" for suggesting it? And if you really can't understand what I'm talking about besides that truth, then it is a problem in your abilities to understand, not a problem in my ability to state; I can't put it any clearer than I did just then. Also, I can't say anything about specific people in the abortion thread; As I said in basic agreement, the Choicers in there tend to be idiots. I left the abortion debate threads (In the main Gaia forums) a long time ago because people on both sides tend to be idiots. Choicers spew their uneducated mantras, Pro-Lifers spew their uneducated mantras. You have a few intelligent people on either side but, as a rule, the threads tend to be dominated by people who either post once with a "My side is right because and your side is wrong and evil because " or people who stay, but that's still the limit of their knowledge. Pro-Choicers who stay, and say we're evil women haters, and Pro-Lifers who stay and say that the Pro-Choicers are evil baby killers.
It seems like more Pro-Choicers do it because there are more Pro-Choicers there, but I would bet that, percentage wise, it's more likely to be about equal. Perhaps moreso on our side, because many of us, for instance me, get sick of dealing with so many Pro-Choicers in the same run around and quit, while they don't have a problem with continuing to gang up on us with the same old arguments. I can't judge that, though, because if it were the other way around, I might very well do the same thing.
But the point is, you can't possibly be saying that Pro-Choicers are almost all idiots, and there are no stupid Pro-Lifers.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:18 pm
I don't even really bother that much with the abortion thread anymore, it's not even a debate half the time and lot of the arguments and things people say half the time don't seem to make any sense.
Both sides in that debate seems to lack facts (without facts, it's just mere opinion which doesn't do much for the debate).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:46 pm
I.Am Samsare First of all, I wasn't referring to anything that went on in this forum. Second, "get along and/or discuss abortion in a safe, friendly environment"? "Drug users are morons"? The hell are you blathering about? You know, I'm pretty easy going as a general rule, but I think that, as a moderator of this forum, I deserve a little more respect than that. I hope you're kidding. I'd gladly give you respect, but I can see you're going to front like I have no reason not to. That makes you even less deserving of respect. Quote: Are you going to claim that you aren't another Erasmas account, and that you didn't make a thread in the subforum called "Pro-Choicers are kind of, well, retarded?" A title that you quote nearly exactly in your posting of this, right after you said that you catch "thirty-one flavors of s**t" for suggesting it? And if you really can't understand what I'm talking about besides that truth, then it is a problem in your abilities to understand, not a problem in my ability to state; I can't put it any clearer than I did just then. Again: what the hell are you blathering on about? I'm Erasmas. I don't remember making a thread that said pro-choicers are kind of, well, retarded in the sub-forum. I wasn't referring to any thread I've made in this, or the pro-choice subforum. Perhaps there is a problem in my abilities to understand your blatant attempt to play gotcha and pull punches. Quote: Also, I can't say anything about specific people in the abortion thread; As I said in basic agreement, the Choicers in there tend to be idiots. I left the abortion debate threads (In the main Gaia forums) a long time ago because people on both sides tend to be idiots. Choicers spew their uneducated mantras, Pro-Lifers spew their uneducated mantras. what are the uneducated mantras of pro-lifers? Who did this when you did participate in the abortion threads? You have a few intelligent people on either side but, as a rule, the threads tend to be dominated by people who either post once with a "My side is right because and your side is wrong and evil because " or people who stay, but that's still the limit of their knowledge. Pro-Choicers who stay, and say we're evil women haters, and Pro-Lifers who stay and say that the Pro-Choicers are evil baby killers.And the pro-lifers who stay and argue that line are...whom? Or, rather, were whom?Quote: It seems like more Pro-Choicers do it because there are more Pro-Choicers there, but I would bet that, percentage wise, it's more likely to be about equal. This would be a ridiculous appeal to moderation. Why are you so afraid of taking a side? Perhaps moreso on our side, because many of us, for instance me, get sick of dealing with so many Pro-Choicers in the same run around and quit, while they don't have a problem with continuing to gang up on us with the same old arguments. I can't judge that, though, because if it were the other way around, I might very well do the same thing. I wouldn't. I bet most of us wouldn't. Do you think pro-life is the right position to hold, or just the most fulfilling for some other transient reason?Quote: But the point is, you can't possibly be saying that Pro-Choicers are almost all idiots, and there are no stupid Pro-Lifers. Where did I say that again? Who was I referring to? When? Just as a point of blind wisdom, sure there are a lot of pro-lifers who are dumb. My point has never been to take sides in that way, and I'm pretty in all my "clones" I've clarified that point several times. My point is, taking that kind of "people on both sides are dumb" stance strikes me as weak and intellectually lazy. It's not like it's not above pro-choicers to make all-encompassing statements about us (up to and including some of them in this guild) and use it as a way of perpetrating their point of view. And it's about s**t that they don't, and couldn't know about us, such as the idea that we hate women, we hate choice, we always call women murderers, etc. They don't mind convicting us as a whole with the statements of scant few, and they use precisely that kind of argumentation to justify being closed-minded to our views. It's lazy because, like I've mentioned several times before: there's supposedly an equal number of pro-lifers who embody all the traits we don't like in pro-choicers, who are they? How often do they post? Do they stick around page after page, debating their views? It's not that we're incapable of doing it, it's just that we...kind of don't. I mean, some people on both sides troll, and I'm not talking about them. But seriously...I'm waiting on the list of pro-lifers who do this, and thus, bring down our argument. IRL? Maybe, but I can't say I've really heard many who calls themselves pro-life go there, either. Besides, of course, people from the Army of God and other extremist groups. But your average Joe Pro-lifer? No. Not even close. But...your average Joe Pro-choicer? Well...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:52 pm
Samsare I hope you're kidding. I'd gladly give you respect, but I can see you're going to front like I have no reason not to. That makes you even less deserving of respect. What the hell are you even talking about? I'm feeling some abuse of power coming on. As for gladly giving respect, I've never seen you give anyone respect, gladly or not. I suspect you would "respect" someone who agreed with you and licked your boots, but, sadly, you will not get that from me. Quote: Again: what the hell are you blathering on about? I'm Erasmas. I don't remember making a thread that said pro-choicers are kind of, well, retarded in the sub-forum. I wasn't referring to any thread I've made in this, or the pro-choice subforum. Perhaps there is a problem in my abilities to understand your blatant attempt to play gotcha and pull punches. Seriously, what's this persecution complex you've got going on? I'm not trying to play "gotcha," I'm not pulling punches. Looking back, I see it was "BeautifulDick" who actually made the thread and, while I still believe that was you, since I have no proof, I'll rescind that. If you were not speaking of that thread, praytell, what were you speaking of? Quote: What are the uneducated mantras of pro-lifers? Who did this when you did participate in the abortion threads? How about, "The Bible says so," "God doesn't want us to kill babies," "You're killing babies," "You're murderers," etc? Yeah, it's all on a theme, but we're not talking about intelligent people here. And like I remember who exactly they were. This was two years ago. I don't memorize the names of every stupid person I meet; That would take up all of my brain space, and I need that for more important things. Be glad I remember your name. Quote: And the pro-lifers who stay and argue that line are...whom? Or, rather, were whom? Again, like I remember there names. Do you deny that such Pro-Lifers exist? Quote: This would be a ridiculous appeal to moderation. Why are you so afraid of taking a side? What? I'm very strongly Pro-Life, Erasmas. I am in the, apparently small, percentage who believe that abortion should be reserved for only cases where the mother's life is in danger, and that it shouldn't be called abortion then as the death of the fetus is an unfortunate side effect of saving the mother's life. I just don't defend people just because they are also Pro-Life. And I don't attack people just because they are Pro-Choice. I know you've got this "It's a war, us against them, so why be nice?" thing going on, but that's not the case; There are intelligent people on both sides, there are stupid, gullible, sheeplike people on both sides. As Pro-Lifers, we all tend to see it as "Pro-Choicers are gullible, stupid people otherwise they wouldn't be Pro-Choice," but that's simply not the case. I do believe that their arguments are, on a whole, wrong and incomplete. I think it's ridiculous how many people believe them. But it is not because they are stupid. It's because that's the way they've been raised, it's because that's the way everyone around them thinks, and it's because they have developed an emotional belief that the right to bodily integrity overwrites every other right. Quote: I wouldn't. I bet most of us wouldn't. Do you think pro-life is the right position to hold, or just the most fulfilling for some other transient reason? You most likely misunderstood what I was saying; What I was saying was, there are probably more hit-and-runners, and mindless zealots, on the Pro-Life side, because a lot of sensible Pro-Lifers just quit the debate, because they don't want to deal with the stress. There's not as much stress for the Pro-Choicers, because they have the advantage of numbers. So, percentage wise, more of the smart Pro-Lifers quit than the smart Pro-Choicers. If there is a starting percentage on both sides that is equal, the end percentages will have a higher number of idiots on the Pro-Life side than on the Pro-Choice side. Quote: Where did I say that again? Who was I referring to? When? Well you keep asking me for the exact names of stupid Pro-Lifers, so I can only assume you don't believe in their existence. Quote: My point is, taking that kind of "people on both sides are dumb" stance strikes me as weak and intellectually lazy. It's not like it's not above pro-choicers to make all-encompassing statements about us (up to and including some of them in this guild) and use it as a way of perpetrating their point of view. And it's about s**t that they don't, and couldn't know about us, such as the idea that we hate women, we hate choice, we always call women murderers, etc. They don't mind convicting us as a whole with the statements of scant few, and they use precisely that kind of argumentation to justify being closed-minded to our views. Oh, so because some Pro-Choicers do it, we should do it? Because some Pro-Choicers use dirty, underhanded methods, we should? On Gaia, there is a much higher percentage of Pro-Choicers who are like that, yes, because their guild is led by people who support it. And there are fewer Pro-Lifers because our guild is led by people who do not. Our guild is led by people who are compassionate, and believe in civilized debate. So the Pro-Choicers of the Pro-Choice guild tend to agree with those tactics, shut up, or come here. But it's not because Pro-Lifers are less likely to feel that way; I've met plenty of people who either think that way wholeheartedly or are at least like you and think, "Well if they do it, why shouldn't we?" Quote: It's lazy because, like I've mentioned several times before: there's supposedly an equal number of pro-lifers who embody all the traits we don't like in pro-choicers, who are they? How often do they post? Do they stick around page after page, debating their views? Again, I can't speak for now, but they did before. And it's not an equal -number-, I never said there's an equal -number-, only an equal percentage. Since there are a lot more Pro-Choicers, there are a lot more numerically who do that then there are Pro-Lifers. Quote: But...your average Joe Pro-choicer? Well... That's where we disagree. Your average Joe Pro-Choicer is just as unlikely to be like that as your average Joe Pro-Lifer. You just see them as more likely, because you're Pro-Life.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:39 pm
I think a part of the problem is,
1, the average Joe Pro-choicer is like the average Joe Pro-lifer. You'll rarely see one in the abortion debate.
2, Gaia is made up of younger people. If you're a teenager and pro-life, chances are you've had to really think about it because so many of your peers are pro-choice and yeah you will be scorned for your views. It's so much easier in that age group, in general, to be pro-choice unless you go to a school that is heavily Christian. Ignorance sort of gets seeded over. The ignorance we've got left are the one-post "God loves babies," people. They're actually as numerous as the one-post "It's my body, my choice," people, but far more annoying because at least the "it's my body," crowd has a face for a cause and not a deity who some people believe in and some people don't.
3, There are several individuals who have consistently argued pro-life points without being pro-life in those threads because so few of us actually go there, so while I can think of (but not name) a few individuals that are consistently stupid, they're not actually pro-life. They're all male coincidentally. It's really weird.
Back when I was debating, I can't think of anyone who behaved like that because we were all in here and we all learned pretty quickly. I don't know nowadays since I like my blood pressure at a nice healthy level.
So I'll actually agree with you. Not that a lot of pro-choicers are retarded, but that there are some who are so ingrained in the party line that they can't use their brains anymore. Some of them at least try to sidestep it with philosophy but they still fail to admit basic biological facts. I mean I agree with Andy that we've got just as many idiots ("It might not be alive until the second trimester but it's a potential life!!!" "You can't compare it to cows because cows are like vegetables" "It says in the bible that you'll go to hell for killing babies," "If you only have sex right after your period you won't get pregnant, women who get pregnant out of wedlock are just greedy whores." etc), but at least on Gaia our idiots are less persistent.
There's a reason I, for one, don't take a stance against a group that encompasses half of my country. For one, most of them are morons and that's a given because most people are morons. Most pro-lifers are morons too. It pretty much goes without saying. But for another, Gaia is a horrible population sample and the margin for error is just too big for me to pin something that specific down on a group that makes up that much of the world. When they do it, it's a mistake and they're factually wrong, correct? Well...why would you want to be just as wrong? "But I don't believe I'm wrong based on what I've seen." Neither do they, but it doesn't change the fact that they are. And yes I'm confident enough to call it a fact. It's not an appeal to moderation to be fair when fairness is warranted, and I'm not about to be unfair to an entire group because of numerous stupid individuals on Gaia. I'm also lucky enough that I debated awhile back when there actually was a list of people worth debating with because they weren't ignorant. Some of them are still on today, but not nearly as many.
Anyway. You'll catch 31 flavors of s**t, but only because you're taking the Gaia debating population and applying it to the whole, or seem to be. It's not retarded when it's average.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:36 am
I.Am And, before, you "caught thirty-one flavors of s**t" because you were posting in the subforum, which is meant for Pro-Lifers and Pro-Choicers to get along and/or discuss abortion in a safe, friendly environment. Do you think a group for, I don't know, the discussion of drug rights, would or should stand for a post saying "Drug users are morons"?i frequent Digg.com which oft reminds me that there is little hope for the human race. 3nodding Does that count?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:26 pm
kp is dcvi I.Am And, before, you "caught thirty-one flavors of s**t" because you were posting in the subforum, which is meant for Pro-Lifers and Pro-Choicers to get along and/or discuss abortion in a safe, friendly environment. Do you think a group for, I don't know, the discussion of drug rights, would or should stand for a post saying "Drug users are morons"?i frequent Digg.com which oft reminds me that there is little hope for the human race. 3nodding Does that count? lol, maybe! I don't believe I've ever used Digg.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:17 pm
I.Am kp is dcvi I.Am And, before, you "caught thirty-one flavors of s**t" because you were posting in the subforum, which is meant for Pro-Lifers and Pro-Choicers to get along and/or discuss abortion in a safe, friendly environment. Do you think a group for, I don't know, the discussion of drug rights, would or should stand for a post saying "Drug users are morons"?i frequent Digg.com which oft reminds me that there is little hope for the human race. 3nodding Does that count? lol, maybe! I don't believe I've ever used Digg. Don't. Don't. Don't.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:48 pm
Oh come on, it couldn't be any worse than certain infamous imageboards. Probably influenced by them.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 7:58 pm
I.Am Oh come on, it couldn't be any worse than certain infamous imageboards. Probably influenced by them. Actually... ...well ... Yes. sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|