|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:10 am
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/11/11/baptizing.dead.jews.ap/index.htmlSome of you may have seen my thread in M&R about this. I've been less than tactful in my arguing about it there. I don't feel that I should have to restrain any animosity I harbor towards the LDS Church when this is going on. Why should I tolerate them and their beliefs when they clearly have no desire to tolerate us and ours? Discuss: Your reaction to this news. Hoes does this impact your opinion of Mormons? What, if anything, should we do about this?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:35 am
Yes. There is a key difference. It is part of the Mormon religion to actively attempt to convert people, or at least find people who want converting, whereas conversion is not actively seeked, in fact is basically discourage, in Judaism. We view conversion as a serious issue, and make sure someone's belief in HASHEM is strong before accepting them into our religion, and even then with years of work. It's true, Mormonism, or the Church of the LDS, isn't really a Noachide religion. And its founder was shot for trying to break out of prison (or maybe that's just a myth, the polygamist! mrgreen ) but we can still respect them for their beliefs, as they respect ours, but they are a tinsy bit forceful in their views. Ah well. Everyone, and faith, has ups and downs. This changes my opinion very little, they've been doing this kind of thing for years. I think it's morally and spiritually wrong, yes, but we cannot, and will not, do anything about it. It's their beliefs. Their goyim baptisms are obviously a load of pony. It's not going to affect Jewish people in the afterlife, and there's no harm in letting Mormons practice what they believe. However. By now counting these people as Mormons, and not the faithful, good, suffering Jewish people they lived and died as, they are desecrating these people's memory. I thought it was Mormon tradition to have the permission of the surviving relatives first. The only issue I have with this is that these people died for holding fast to their religion, and so any change the the memory of them being Jewish is dishonourable. Continue discussion?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:54 am
How are they being considerate and tolerant towards our religion when they enact rituals that invoke idolatrous beings over the sacred memory of our most revered dead in history? This is neither tolerant nor considerate, it is a statement by their church that they know better, and therefore the rights and wishes of our dead are ignorable.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:51 pm
But the fact we both know is that they don't know better. Let them continue to do what they wish, or you can try to persuade them to stop. So long as they don't touch the graves, and people's records aren't altered, let them do what they wish now, and let them be punished in the next life for it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
darkphoenix1247 Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:55 pm
I think that's a difficult thing to take a position. On the one hand, words cannot describe how speechless I am at hearing of such an atrocity. Religion and beliefs, no matter what, should not cause harm to another person (physically or not). If Mormonism dictates that, then I lost what little respect I had for the religion anyway. But, that's not saying I don't respect Mormons in general- a few of my friends are, and they're genuinely good people. I just think their views are completely misguided.
I'll write more later when I have time, but it's not right to hate all Mormons because of this.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:07 pm
I don't really get it....why would Mormons baptise people after they're dead, (no matter what their religion)?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:26 pm
Between this, and Prop 8 bullshit, I've lost any and all respect I had for the Mormon Church.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:41 pm
Ok... here's the deal, as explained by a Mormon.
If a person decides that they want to convert to Mormonism, the Mormons, being very big into genealogy help learn the family history of the convert.
The Mormons believe in the Afterlife, they believe in eternity in heaven surrounded by all the other Mormons, in a pure Mormon heaven.
So they retroactively baptize the spirits of the convert's ancestry, to allow the convert to rejoin his family in Mormon Heaven.
They've been doing it for 178 years, it's what they do it's how they show an act of devotion.
Now I don't pretend to know what actually happens when you're in heaven and you're retroactively and posthumously baptized by another religion. I have no idea if there's an appeals process, if the spirit is forced to go, or if the spirit can be in two heavens at once.
So as far as I'm concerned... I may just be reincarnated after I pass on, and if my children or my children's children (of which I have none) become Mormons, when they come to find me to tell me to pack my bags and leave Jewish Heaven, they will discovered that I'm not there.
And if I am in Heaven, I'm already dead. So what do I have to worry about?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:54 pm
In all honesty I am truly upset with this practice. When my Ex Girlfriend told me of this I was angered. I cannot stand that they think that they have the RIGHT to baptize those who are dead, those who would be mortified if they came from the grave and saw what they are doing. I mark this up their with a lot of mormon practices that I do not like, this being the top of course.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:57 am
*cautious approach* The idea is that a person is baptised for the dead, but they get to choose whether or not to accept it. Like, they do not automatically become "Mormon" but a stamp is put somewhere that says "option was given." It is for those who never had the option in life to take it or leave it as they will after death. Does that makes sense?
I'm not saying it isn't offensive, but it really is done with the best of intentions. The idea that they have is that before the end of days, all of humanity will have been given that choice. From Jewish people to "sqeaking pygmies", everyone gets a fair shot.
They think they have the truth and are trying to give everyone the chance to go with it if they want to.
(on a very random note, I'm sooo pissed about the Prop 8 thing I almost didn't post in defense of the practice. Oh, so infuriating) (on a second random note, Joseph Smith wasn't trying to get out of jail, a mob was coming to do him in and there was a dramatic firefight...most Mormons don't even know he shot back. My husband's great-great grandpa led that mob...)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:29 am
I've spent some time interacting with Mormons in high school and also in the workplace. I'd like to dispel some myths and correct some perceptions that are apparently pretty widespread here.
1. Mormons (members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, LDS for short) do not baptize the dead by digging them up, nor by going to the gravesites and sprinkling or pouring water. They do it by going and having themselves baptized in place of the dead. They're called proxy baptisms. You go to a Mormon temple, are handed a slip of paper with the dead person's name on it, and you're baptized in their place.
2. They do it because, so they say, their leaders are divinely inspired with the names of people who -- after death, in the grand celestial waiting room -- had the chance to hear and accept the Mormon gospel doctrines.
3. What actually happens is that faithful Mormons get the names of dead people and submit them to the temples. Someone prays and says, "Heavenly Father, we ask that you inspire us as to whether these individuals have truly accepted your gospel." And lo and behold, all the names are miraculously confirmed by the Holy Spirit and are submitted for proxy baptism.
4. This procedure has no spiritual efficacy whatsoever. It has no effect whatsoever on the dead. The only effect on those who "stand in" for the dead by participating in proxy baptism is that they get wet. However, the living do suffer because of this. Mormons suffer because they have to pay to enter the temple (one-tenth of their PRE-TAX income for at least one year to get a Temple Recommend, an admittance card).
5. The relatives of the baptism victims also suffer because they'll eventually hear that Great-grandma Dora or Uncle Lewis, who were devout Jews/Muslims/Catholics/Wiccans/atheists their whole life, have suddenly become Mormons according to the Mormon genealogical records. So whenever they or anyone else researches their family, they will discover "Dora Green, Mormon" instead of "Dora Green, Jewish." This CAN become so serious that a rabbinical court will, in the absence of other information, be obligated to say "It says here that Dora Green is Mormon, not Jewish. I'm sorry, but her descendants aren't Jewish." This can create serious problems for Dora Green's descendants, if those records aren't corrected, and if a rabbinical court ever consults those records.
6. Yes, the LDS stated policy is to receive permission for proxy baptism from the target's living relatives. However, they never actually bother to consult with living relatives unless those relatives are converts to Mormonism, and are the ones that have submitted the names for proxy baptism in the first place. A son can submit the name of his deceased father, even over his mother's objections, for instance: the Mormon convert's word is taken over the non-Mormon family members.
7. Yes, Joseph Smith was imprisoned for destroying a printing press that was printing facts that were detrimental to early Mormonism's reputation. He was handed a gun by one of his followers, and shot at least one of his jailers himself, before being shot himself in his escape attempt.
8. I saved this one for number 8, in "honor" of Proposition 8. I think it's cute, funny, and endearing -- you know, in that "not at all" way -- that the LDS leadership and membership are so intent on defining marriage as being between ONE man and ONE woman, and robbing the rights of others, when their own church was kicked out of one place after another for the crime of polygamy.
I have no respect for Mormonism's doctrines and practices. However, I do have respect for individuals within any religion that act with integrity and kindness to others. Therefore, I ask that we not turn the Jewish Gaians Guild into the Mormon-Bashing Guild. It's not cool. Let's go back to being "yay Jews!" instead of "boo Mormons!"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:42 am
Alright, the prop 8 thing.
I think we all agree that we support same sex marriage.
And now, why I support same sex marriage outside of the whole sodomy issue.
Single parents, have a very hard time dealing with raising kids and raising income. It's a struggle, there needs to be parents with very young children at all times for all times. Parents have legal responsibilities and privileges with their children. Babysitters don't raise kids. Childcare does not cover it. Grandma and Grandpa can only do so much.
There should be two parents to maintain consistency and discipline and teach kids life lessons and sign legal forms when needed. Two parents are better than one, they offer trust, unconditional love and give children a feeling of comfort and normalcy.
So what if two straight people want to get married simply to help their own already born children, because one is a widower, divorcee or the fact the biological parent rang the door bell and said "I believe this is yours" and you never saw them again.
I say the hell with the whole "is gay love religiously acceptable," question. I say I support same sex marriage because it gives single parents another avenue on how to help raise and protect their children.
To me... this makes sense, does it make sense to anyone else?
For more political epiphanies, find out why I think it would be easier and cheaper to give American citizens one million dollars a piece to help bailout the economy, rather than the industrial care packages the government keeps conjuring up.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:24 pm
Divash had it really close....but slanted kinda funny. The "ten percent pre-tax income" is referring to the Tithing thing. You aren't paying to enter the temple, you are paying because you think it is a commandment of G-d. You go to the temple after following a whole lot more commandments than that. Mormons feel they are blessed by paying tithing.
Mormons have no power over records other than their own. You look up Great aunt Gertrude in any records not held by the Mormons, they are unchanged. Even those-I'm not entirely sure they change them. They put in a footnote saying the work was done... Do rabbinical counsels consult Mormon records? Why would they do that? Wouldn't they have to allow for the obvious, untrustworthy slant?
The leadership doesn't "pray about" names-every person who has ever lived is supposed to get the chance. Anyone can submit names-A guy at work asked me once if I had a name I wanted baptised by proxy. They collect names from everyone, whether the person in Mormon or not.
Joseph Smith's escape attempt had an awful lot to do with the 100 some odd person mob (dressed as Indians!) trying to kill him. He shot lots of people-he fired 12 shots. I've never heard it confirmed that he killed anyone 'cause *as far as I know* no one has come forward and said "he killed my brother!" because that mob was...illegal. My husband's great-grandfather would have loved to have something like that to hold up though...Oh, it would have made that man's day. If he could have screamed "escape attempt" Phinneus Ewing Kirkpatrick would have done cartwheels. Would have killed every Mormon in the room with the law on his side. If he wanted to escape, he wouldn't have turned himself in. Entertainingly, the reason "Grandpa Phinneus" was chasing the Mormons around was 'cause the were going to swing the slave vote by voting as a block.
Which they still do. And it pisses me off to no end.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:25 pm
My Mom's reaction to the Mormon at the door (she is a Christian): Don't open it! They won't shut up, even if we are already Christian!
Mormons aren't exactly accepted in the Christian community. Some Christians call them "extremists". They can do their own thing, but they can't mess with records. That is insane. They can be their own Mormon self; I really don't care what they believe. Though I find the baptism of the dead more than a little bit creepy.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fabulous Prince Babel
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:58 pm
The Mormons will pay for this, the book series known as Twilight, and their contributions in the Prop. 8 deal.
Mormonism makes me angst almost as much as I angst about Scientology.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|