|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:01 pm
undertaker is my fav super star but whats better undertaker or kane?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 11:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:35 pm
I don't know hows better they are, but I prefer Kane. Taker is a bit over-rated and his gimmick gets old. Kane, on the other side, is under-rated. Could get a push if he would like to, but he always give the spot to the younger talent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:45 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 7:51 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:12 pm
Undertaker hands down
um because he made streaks and impressive wins and well hes on of the best of his brand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:39 pm
Definately Undertaker, I loved his bad a** and big evil persona, it was entertaining, and yes when he was THE Undertaker, it was fine and all, but it did get a bit old, and than he brought it back and crap, with a twist, and he completely made himself look like a fool. But he is a hell of alot better than the former fake Diesel...pathetic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:59 pm
The Undertaker, Kane is a bit overhyped imho. old school, last ride, chokeslam, tombstone piledriver, big boot, guillotine. And when he was big evil with the motorcycle.... yeah.... 'nuff said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 2:05 pm
Undertaker is 99,999,999,999,999,999% better than Kane
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 3:15 pm
TAKER exclaim exclaim exclaim exclaim exclaim exclaim exclaim exclaim exclaim exclaim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:58 pm
Who is Better?? stressed
UNDERTAKER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 8:41 pm
Most of you are pathetic marks and new-age wrestling fans who know absolutely nothing about either of the BOD except for what you see.
Kane is better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 8:46 pm
Pyromaniacs United Most of you are pathetic marks and new-age wrestling fans who know absolutely nothing about either of the BOD except for what you see. Kane is better. Don't get me Wrong I think Kane is awesome as well I just feel Taker is a little more better thats all. Old School Kane was sick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
![[M]a.r.t.s's avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/c3/d7/71c5afb049d7c3_flip.png?t=1661870548_6.00_10)
