|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:56 pm
._. Pick one. Pick one now.
Which ones better? O.o
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:20 am
I'm gonna tell it how it is. Figures chicks would go for Glam Metal -_-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 9:10 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:03 pm
Even that douche bag agrees with me!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:05 pm
rofl
I just don't like Pink Floyd.
All of their songs are like, ******** 10 minutes long.
ftl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:54 pm
yeah dude
glam has nothing to do with it
and montley crue's music is funny, with the weird titles and all
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:29 pm
I know. Pink floyd SUCKKKKKKKS
The end.
xd I love Motley crue wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:06 pm
UnKnown Bitter yeah dude glam has nothing to do with it and montley crue's music is funny, with the weird titles and all You're not here enough, your opinion doesn't matter. THE ZANNA HAS SPOKEN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:59 am
Psh. Motley Crue is better than Pink Floyd.
At the end of the day, who is still making music?
Motley Crue.
The guys are almost all in their 50's now.
Still making music.
Nikki is playing in two bands. Motley and Sixx:A.M.
Clearly Motley Crue is better if they are this successful and still playing.
Although...Saints of Los Angeles was a shitty CD. Ugh!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:12 am
Motley Crue All the way. Then again, I hear Floyd had some killer concerts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:51 am
Oh God...who cares about who's making music?
Guns 'n' Roses still makes music and, for the most part, they suck. They're both house-hold names in the Rock community, but at least Floyd wasn't part of a fad that many attributed to the cancer that killed the Metal in the 90's.
All I have to do is type into Google...
Pink Floyd has over 26 million hits.
Motley Crue has only 5 million, I'm pretty sure the alternative to Church on answers to our existence knows what it's talking about.
Good day!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
