Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Art Fags
There Is No Epic

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

KingRoach

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:31 am


Like the Fall of a Kingdom

User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.




Comment is on dA

I can't say it's complete, and I can't say it's not finished. I think it could use a lot more toning and some shade-editing. Unfortunatly, my backache is back and I can hardly stand using the computer for a sufficient time. I need to hear what you guys think of it.

I'm not sure how the brightness/contrast/hues seem to you. I have a weird monitor.

I stole the finger arrangement from my own hand. Otherwise there was absolutely no reference used for this. Might explain a few things.

Photoshop CS
PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:07 am


Wowzah, this has epic written all over it. But as you said, it is most certainly unfinished.

I think the petals are a little out of place. You could perhaps continue the lightning further into the background instead. Also, his hairline is a little wonky and the whole piece would benefit from a once-over in regards to the shading. You've got the shading-with-black thing going on which works in some images, but if you shade with a darker version of the same color, the whole epic vibe might translate better.

Felicific


KingRoach

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:33 am


Yes, I have been accused of shading with black on this image. I really did not. No need to swear for this. I really think it's a monitor problem, because it looks good on my home monitor (a CRT which overall gives more red to everything), but the darker areas look much darker, almost black on any LCD monitor. I went back home and tuned down the reds, but the image overall still looked much better than it did on my work's LCD. Tish said it's black on two of her monitors, one of which sounded like a CRT. So I really don't know what to do. I can't fix it if what I see is how it's supposed to be, but everyone else sees it wrong.

I admit several problems with anatomy and overall shading and the reflections on the hilt's golden protector (I wanted that to reflect like a mirror) but I got to a point where I had to quit working on it because of the acute pain in my back/shoulder. I thought to myself that I will never return to it, but since everybody's pointing out that it's not a pleasing piece, I might actually reconsider getting back to it if I get better.

The petals are there to give a hint of a supposed death. The fall of the kingdom is symbolized by the lightning striking the column; the petals the death of the king. However, they seem gay to people. Any suggestions?

The king doesn't die, but is thought to have died. This was actually to be followed by a comic-strip-like page or two denoting the beginning of the story after the fall and giving an overall view of the whole scene, showing the malevolent force the king loses to, and that the lightning is caused by it, but I'm not sure I can do it anymore.

What does wonky mean?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:38 am


That's really strange, about the black. And it's a shame that for some people it winds up looking like a noobish dodge/burn job.

The problem is that the petals are part of the asian aesthetic. Overall you've got a God of War vibe going on, despite the katana-like sword. You may need to niche the pic in one time period or the other, either by turning the column into a pagoda and putting a kimono pattern on the fabric, or by giving him a more grecian sword.

As for the petals being "gay," you could always keep them and dull them down a bit. The bright pink is jarring and distracting. They could always be, for example, dried-up petals or leaves.

By wonky, I meant unrealistic. Sorry for being unspecific smile It's nothing that grabbing a reference photo wouldn't solve.

If you don't mind, I'm going to mess around with it in photoshop to see if there are any other suggestions I can make.

Felicific


KingRoach

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:09 am


When I draw, I challenge myself by not using reference photos. Ever. The only thing I referenced here was the arrangement of the fingers on the far hand, taken from my own hand. Other than that, I try to use my memory of what I've learnt off-drawing. Makes the process more interesting.

I really thought to myself "WTF isn't Asian about this image? Except for the column?" and I wanted to do something about it, like making the sword an Arabian scimitar and the column like those in Palmyra, but then I didn't really care. razz Dry leaves is a good idea. The hair and fabric are overly blown to an unrealistic extent because I imagined there was very strong wind there. The first concept with the column was that it would be breaking apart, the shreds flying upwards, despite that the king is standing still... cool, perhaps stupid.

Oh no, I don't use noobish dodge/burn. Only elite multiply/screen. wink lol

Be my guest with Photoshop. But please don't feel upset if I end up not making adjustments to this image. I will definitely benefit for other projects, though.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:20 am


I won't be offended, hehe. It's your picture, your call.

I do have some concern for your lack of ref pix. It's totally okay to sketch sans reference pix, but if you're making a really elaborate photoshop painting... I dunno, I feel like it works against you if you don't have something to look at. It's like you're not working to your full potential. But whatever--sometimes I'll work without refs too, for the sake of the challenge. Hehe.

User Image
Anyway, I didn't do too much. The first and foremost thing I did was swap background pics. I recommend cgtextures.com, you can just nab pix from it and throw em in your own. The issue I had with your previous sky was that it was not receeding into the background. It was as though you had oriented it to be a ground plane instead of a sky, which really didn't lend any depth to the piece.

User Image
This is where I followed action lines in the piece to figure out the composition. You have a lot of perpendicular action lines in X-patterns, which is a marvelous compositional tool... but then you have the hard horizontal of the sword and vertical of the column. At this point in the creation process, they work well enough to be left alone, but for future reference... consistency is good smile

Felicific


KingRoach

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:06 am


Drawing has never been a profession for me. It's merely about the hobby and the challenge, hopefully communication, and I plan to keep it that way. It has never been about the quality of the drawing as a final product to compete with others in the market/field. It is more about the challenge.. I want to look at the final outcome and think, "I made this, completely." I'd learn the patterns of a texture and draw it instead of using a texture image and edit it. I don't have a problem with a worse-than-I-can-produce image as long as it makes me a little more proud. I'll check that website of course. Sounds very interesting.

The background's added a very nice touch, but that, along with the edits you've made to the figure have changed the position of the "camera". I'm much closer and at a lower angle. You are farther (in which case the perspective changes dramatically, so the near hand can't be that large.) You also changed his breasts. The rectangular breasts aren't his. The setting is the flat top of a very high tower with those columns all around. (The king will fall off the tower.) That is why there is only a one tone sky in my image. The clouds are also supposed to give a hint at the direction of the wind. Don't know how that worked, I didn't make any effort for it.

I can show the stages I went through. The mouth was close to that shape at the beginning, but I decided to make it more human. Those corners of the lower lip are something I do when I want to look funny, but they don't happen in a serious scene, and they don't happen without all of the neck muscles attached to the collar bone getting taunt and stand out.

It is important for me that his body isn't comic-style perfectionist. Not much of rect-breast, and not much of a curvy side. You've detailed the inside of his mouth; something I should have done. Thank you. smile
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:34 am


Cool. It's interesting to hear your justification of things, you said a few things that I could use in my own art. Hope you learned something, and I hope my weird edits haven't offended you lol.

Sorry I don't have much to say >_O my busy-a** afternoon is about to start.

OH, about the n****e placement/rect-pec thing, I made that edit because it looked strange to me, and I understand the rectangular breast argument but here's where some refs would help...

http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/GB/MP0479~David-Beckham-Posters.jpg
http://imgs13.stockmediaserver.com/th170/imagesource/IS085-074.jpg
http://www.characterdesigns.com/bandaid/content/photosets/325/329/Photoset_011_004.JPG

Source of the last one is http://www.characterdesigns.com/index.php?sitepage=photosets , which is an ammmaaaazzzing invaluable ref site for character art

Felicific


KingRoach

PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:37 am


Not at all. It was very nice seeing the subliminal impression given to you by my drawing. The edits were very nice. It's just that the wanted impression was different; like specific physical features of my character and the overall scene/situation which I haven't quite explained.

Thanks a lot for the links. smile And have a very good busy-a** afternoon.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:48 am


The more I look at it, the more I realize how frigging bad this is.

Anyway, there is no way one can realize the difference between monitors using inter-computer technology. The only way is through using an external eye. So here is the difference between the LCD monitor at work, and my CRT at home: the one I made this drawing on; using my phone camera.

That CRT gives off more radiation than LCD explains the high exposure of the last image. The first frame is the same LCD in the second one, only from a higher angle. Makes better contrast somehow. The only thing to notice is the colors themselves. Please comment.

User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.




For more information, please dial 888-wkthru.

Sorry for the low-quality GIF animation. I don't know how to do better.

User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.

And the close-up's I forgot to post because I'm partially retarded.

User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.

KingRoach


slopii

PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:28 am


KingRoach
Not at all. It was very nice seeing the subliminal impression given to you by my drawing. The edits were very nice. It's just that the wanted impression was different; like specific physical features of my character and the overall scene/situation which I haven't quite explained.

Thanks a lot for the links. smile And have a very good busy-a** afternoon.
If you like your image exactly as it is why do you post it for crit? why not just say its finished and take advice for next time?

I think considering the lighting in the background the whole character is under contrasted and has no blue tones which it would if there really was lighting right next to him.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:37 am


If you read through I did pretty much say I don't like it the way it is. What I'm saying is that it looks different on my home monitor. The monitor thing annoys me to no end and I want to keep discussing the ******** until I find a solution to it. Cuz it's a problem.

Thanks for the tips.

KingRoach

Reply
Art Fags

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum