|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 10:56 am
In opinion both of them are amazing but I want to know how people feel Zakk or Rhandy? (I don't only mean with Ozzy)
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 5:37 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:18 am
I say Wylde. Rhoads was legendary no doubt. But Wylde does great too with Ozzy plus I really love what he does in BLS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:09 pm
See thats why it's hard for me to really say one for sure. Rhandy Rhodes was like you said a legend and you really can't touch him, but on the other hand Zakk Wylde is amazing and has influenced me alot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:29 am
I like the fact that he can contribute so much to an already established band and still retain and define himself in that band, his own band and in the music world in general. Thats pretty amazing in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:04 pm
*lol* No contest. Rhoads was one of the most influential guitarist of all time. He wasn't just a great, original player, both on rhythm and lead, he was a gifted rock composer, as close as rock gets to a Mozart or a Bach.
Wylde plays fast pentatonic scales and does a lot of pinch harmonics. That's about it. Lots of flash, very little substance. If he ever writes anything on par with, say, Diary of a Madman, we can reopen this discussion, but until then... fast players are a dime a dozen. *shrug* Maybe I'm wrong... does anyone have a link to a Wylde solo where he isn't just wanking, where he plays something tasteful, original, and musically interesting?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:00 am
well...wylde IS still alive....so..... rolleyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:39 am
Zladko *lol* No contest. Rhoads was one of the most influential guitarist of all time. He wasn't just a great, original player, both on rhythm and lead, he was a gifted rock composer, as close as rock gets to a Mozart or a Bach. Wylde plays fast pentatonic scales and does a lot of pinch harmonics. That's about it. Lots of flash, very little substance. If he ever writes anything on par with, say, Diary of a Madman, we can reopen this discussion, but until then... fast players are a dime a dozen. *shrug* Maybe I'm wrong... does anyone have a link to a Wylde solo where he isn't just wanking, where he plays something tasteful, original, and musically interesting?
It's opinion like anything else in art. Rhodes is a legend I don't think anyone here has said otherwise to that, but I don't think saying Wylde is talentless is just.
My $0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
