|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:13 pm
(I don't think showable is a word.oh well xp )
I've heard different things.Some people say that petticoats should never be shown,and some people show them on purpose.So what do you think?Accesory or underskirt?(That sounds uber-cheezy,but I can't think of anything else to say sweatdrop )
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:44 am
An accidental peek is okay, but showing a petticoat on purpose seems kind of tacky to me. Like wearing a thong so it shows at the waistband of your jeans, but not quite so slutty. o_o;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:28 am
spuntino An accidental peek is okay, but showing a petticoat on purpose seems kind of tacky to me. Like wearing a thong so it shows at the waistband of your jeans, but not quite so slutty. o_o;
I agree, but there are some styles that do show thier petticoat sometimes, like Punk Loli. I've seen it many a time in them, and I think it's cute. whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:13 am
Don't show your petticoat on purpose. Bloomers, on the other hand, are a different matter. They can be shown on purpose or can be completely hidden.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:08 am
no... Petticoats are UNDERGARMENTS!!!
though when i was little i wore my grammies petticoats outside as skirts. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 3:43 pm
Why are bloomers different? o_O
Not trying to sound like a smart-a**, I'm really just curious... sweatdrop
Both are "undergarments", right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:00 pm
I don't really think it matters either way. If you want to show your petticoat, go ahead. Nobody is going to kill you over it.
Though I have to admit, there are some lolis out there that will go completely hay-wire it they see something they consider "improper" of a lolita.
But it's your clothes, do whatever you want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:40 pm
Nookie Monster Why are bloomers different? o_O Not trying to sound like a smart-a**, I'm really just curious... sweatdrop Both are "undergarments", right?
Petticoats absolutely does not look right when they stick out. It's like having a nice black formal dress on and having the cheap white slip sticking out from the bottom of the dress.
The main purpose of bloomers are used to keep yourself from getting "panty shots" if air every by chance blows your skirt in that way. And unlike petticoats, bloomers are decorated with lace and are usually (or should be, for comfort) some kind of cotton material. They're kind of like what socks would be for shoes, except with a dress. Comfort and protection, with the optional appeal. And sometimes the 'end' of the bloomers look a good to some lolis if it sticks out (sometimes that might happen inevitably, if the skirt length of the dress/skirt is an inch or two short of the usually knee-length), but just like the skirt v.s. the knees/leg, if too much of it is showing, it looks kind of ridiculous and scandalous.
-...quand le soleil sera couché dans ton âme froide.-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:21 pm
ChibiChew I don't really think it matters either way. If you want to show your petticoat, go ahead. Nobody is going to kill you over it. You would be surprised. Quote: But it's your clothes, do whatever you want. Ahaha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:49 am
C a t h a r s i s ChibiChew I don't really think it matters either way. If you want to show your petticoat, go ahead. Nobody is going to kill you over it. You would be surprised. Quote: But it's your clothes, do whatever you want. Ahaha. I don't quite understand the 'Ahaha'o.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:25 am
Depends on the thickness and style of the petticoat really, if it is ornate enough to not look silly poking out of the end of a skirt. but in most cases it probably won't accent your oufit very well so try to buy the right length skirts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 10:29 am
I think it depends on the style as well. Like if its ero-loli, then well....all they wear usually are petticoats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 10:16 pm
I usually, if my skirt does not have a nice lace edging... might let my petticoat show just a little bit. I think if that is the case, it just adds detail and is cute, so not slutty 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 2:38 pm
Amanikitty Nookie Monster Why are bloomers different? o_O Not trying to sound like a smart-a**, I'm really just curious... sweatdrop Both are "undergarments", right?
Petticoats absolutely does not look right when they stick out. It's like having a nice black formal dress on and having the cheap white slip sticking out from the bottom of the dress.
The main purpose of bloomers are used to keep yourself from getting "panty shots" if air every by chance blows your skirt in that way. And unlike petticoats, bloomers are decorated with lace and are usually (or should be, for comfort) some kind of cotton material. They're kind of like what socks would be for shoes, except with a dress. Comfort and protection, with the optional appeal. And sometimes the 'end' of the bloomers look a good to some lolis if it sticks out (sometimes that might happen inevitably, if the skirt length of the dress/skirt is an inch or two short of the usually knee-length), but just like the skirt v.s. the knees/leg, if too much of it is showing, it looks kind of ridiculous and scandalous.
-...quand le soleil sera couché dans ton âme froide.- Sure, but some petticoats are amazingly detailed and just as pretty as bloomers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:00 pm
Nookie Monster Amanikitty Nookie Monster Why are bloomers different? o_O Not trying to sound like a smart-a**, I'm really just curious... sweatdrop Both are "undergarments", right?
Petticoats absolutely does not look right when they stick out. It's like having a nice black formal dress on and having the cheap white slip sticking out from the bottom of the dress.
The main purpose of bloomers are used to keep yourself from getting "panty shots" if air every by chance blows your skirt in that way. And unlike petticoats, bloomers are decorated with lace and are usually (or should be, for comfort) some kind of cotton material. They're kind of like what socks would be for shoes, except with a dress. Comfort and protection, with the optional appeal. And sometimes the 'end' of the bloomers look a good to some lolis if it sticks out (sometimes that might happen inevitably, if the skirt length of the dress/skirt is an inch or two short of the usually knee-length), but just like the skirt v.s. the knees/leg, if too much of it is showing, it looks kind of ridiculous and scandalous.
-...quand le soleil sera couché dans ton âme froide.- Sure, but some petticoats are amazingly detailed and just as pretty as bloomers.
As for the ero-lolita comment...that's really only in photoshoots. If you walked out in public wearing nothing but a petticoat and bloomers, you're going to look awfully underdressed. o_O;;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
