|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 4:25 am
NFL owners will gather in Atlanta Tuesday to decide where the Super Bowl in February 2012 will be played. This will take place in conjunction with them plotting a mission that could lead to the cancellation of that very game and the preceding season. One of the many issues owners will discuss is the evolving strategy regarding the collective bargaining agreement with the league’s players. Right now, the plan appears pretty straight forward: opt out of the agreement in November. This, of course, is the doomsday scenario – one that seems to defy common sense given the apparent success of the NFL. “Everybody is doing well right now, the players and the owners,” Indianapolis Colts center and NFLPA player representative Jeff Saturday said in February. “For us to not be able to work this out … I don’t think the fans would be very understanding of that.” Saturday’s comments are similar to many other players’ and were echoed by New England owner Bob Kraft. "Both sides have a duty to work together in these talks because we are doing very well,” Kraft said. “Hopefully both are smart enough to make that happen.” Opting out of the agreement triggers many things, including the possibility that there will not be a salary cap in the 2010 season and that the terms of the agreement will cease after that season. If that happens, the NFL Players Association expects the owners to attempt a lockout of the players, starting in March 2011. A lockout could ultimately threaten the 2011 season.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 10:11 am
I read this story the other day, personally I think it is a bluff by the NFL owners. There is just too much money in this business. The NFL is the the #1 Sport in America, making more profits than Baseball, Basketball, or Hockey. The numbers from Superbowl XLII, being the second highest rated Televised event ever, (only M.A.S.H. series finale got higher ratings) is definate proof. The owners of the league would be shooting themselves in the foot if this were to happen and the 2011 season doesn't occure.
So overall, I'm not too worried, an agreement will be made, compromises will happen, and no season will be canceled. There is just too much at stake on both sides between the players and owners for this to happen.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 8:37 pm
Japanese_Green_Tea I read this story the other day, personally I think it is a bluff by the NFL owners. There is just too much money in this business. The NFL is the the #1 Sport in America, making more profits than Baseball, Basketball, or Hockey. The numbers from Superbowl XLII, being the second highest rated Televised event ever, (only M.A.S.H. series finale got higher ratings) is definate proof. The owners of the league would be shooting themselves in the foot if this were to happen and the 2011 season doesn't occure.
So overall, I'm not too worried, an agreement will be made, compromises will happen, and no season will be canceled. There is just too much at stake on both sides between the players and owners for this to happen. I, too, think that it is a bluff. The NFL and the Players' Association have not been on the same page lately (ranging from topics to pay compensation to injured veterans, to salary cap and rookie contracts). Other strikes in sports were because of a decrease in popularity, and a direct relation between the athletes and the league. From that I read also, their could be no salary cap in 2010...Yet with Roger Goodell as the NFL Commissioner, I think that this will all be worked out, because he is very precise at what he does.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 3:39 am
Doing anything that would result in an entire season being canceled is absolutely idiotic on the NFL owners' part.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 4:30 am
Also, For the second time in eight years, the Atlanta Falcons opened the vault and dropped a ton of cash on a franchise quarterback.
Matt Ryan, the No. 3 pick in last month's draft, signed a $72 million, six-year contract Tuesday. The announcement of the new deal came with smiles, confident talk of the future and no mention of Michael Vick, the first pick in 2001 who signed a $130 million extension, the richest in the league at the time, in December 2005.
This contract is just.. ubsurd, now Chris Long will be wanting more than this contract and Darren McFadden will be wanting slightly less. They need to have some kind of rookie contract cap.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 5:41 pm
IndianapolisColtsFan Also, For the second time in eight years, the Atlanta Falcons opened the vault and dropped a ton of cash on a franchise quarterback. Matt Ryan, the No. 3 pick in last month's draft, signed a $72 million, six-year contract Tuesday. The announcement of the new deal came with smiles, confident talk of the future and no mention of Michael Vick, the first pick in 2001 who signed a $130 million extension, the richest in the league at the time, in December 2005. This contract is just.. ubsurd, now Chris Long will be wanting more than this contract and Darren McFadden will be wanting slightly less. They need to have some kind of rookie contract cap. True. I definitely think that the higher the pick in the draft, the more money they should make. Yet $72 million to an athlete out of college early? He's still pretty much a kid. There are still veterans who contribute and don't make a fraction of that kind of money. Also, former players who are injured are hurting financially. A cap should definitely be instituted. ...Although, signing rookies to high contracts only hurts the owners' pockets, and hurts the salary cap standing of that franchise...So it's their risk being taken.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 10:26 am
IndianapolisColtsFan This contract is just.. ubsurd, now Chris Long will be wanting more than this contract and Darren McFadden will be wanting slightly less. They need to have some kind of rookie contract cap. I agree, One of my pet peeves is high contracts to rookie draft picks who have yet to prove themselves. So much guranteed money, and Matt Ryan can turn out to be another Ryan Leaf. It's sad how these guys are making the big bucks, without playing a single down in an NFL Game. I say rookies should earn their stripes, and the right to be paid that much money. Now I'm not saying pay them scraps from the dinning room table, but their should be a decent compromise somewhere so first round draft picks, who turn out to be busts don't run off to the bank with so much money that in the long run can and have hurt teams in salary cap issues... Though this topic of discussion includes the possibility of no more salary caps, but you get my point.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 5:25 pm
Dude-LAP IndianapolisColtsFan Also, For the second time in eight years, the Atlanta Falcons opened the vault and dropped a ton of cash on a franchise quarterback. Matt Ryan, the No. 3 pick in last month's draft, signed a $72 million, six-year contract Tuesday. The announcement of the new deal came with smiles, confident talk of the future and no mention of Michael Vick, the first pick in 2001 who signed a $130 million extension, the richest in the league at the time, in December 2005. This contract is just.. ubsurd, now Chris Long will be wanting more than this contract and Darren McFadden will be wanting slightly less. They need to have some kind of rookie contract cap. True. I definitely think that the higher the pick in the draft, the more money they should make. Yet $72 million to an athlete out of college early? He's still pretty much a kid. There are still veterans who contribute and don't make a fraction of that kind of money. Also, former players who are injured are hurting financially. A cap should definitely be instituted. ...Although, signing rookies to high contracts only hurts the owners' pockets, and hurts the salary cap standing of that franchise...So it's their risk being taken. yet agian y i dont like my home team they take stupid gambels. matt ryan hasent played a game yet and gambel money on him based on collage. yeah he could b 1 of the best qb's (unlikely) but they could have waited to c him play first.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 8:19 pm
plus ryan is a product of a weak qb draft class. if ryan was drafted last year he would be 3rd round at best. the Falcons shot themselves in the foot with this guy.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 8:54 am
Oreion Dude-LAP IndianapolisColtsFan Also, For the second time in eight years, the Atlanta Falcons opened the vault and dropped a ton of cash on a franchise quarterback. Matt Ryan, the No. 3 pick in last month's draft, signed a $72 million, six-year contract Tuesday. The announcement of the new deal came with smiles, confident talk of the future and no mention of Michael Vick, the first pick in 2001 who signed a $130 million extension, the richest in the league at the time, in December 2005. This contract is just.. ubsurd, now Chris Long will be wanting more than this contract and Darren McFadden will be wanting slightly less. They need to have some kind of rookie contract cap. True. I definitely think that the higher the pick in the draft, the more money they should make. Yet $72 million to an athlete out of college early? He's still pretty much a kid. There are still veterans who contribute and don't make a fraction of that kind of money. Also, former players who are injured are hurting financially. A cap should definitely be instituted. ...Although, signing rookies to high contracts only hurts the owners' pockets, and hurts the salary cap standing of that franchise...So it's their risk being taken. yet agian y i dont like my home team they take stupid gambels. matt ryan hasent played a game yet and gambel money on him based on collage. yeah he could b 1 of the best qb's (unlikely) but they could have waited to c him play first. I still think that they were better off taking Glenn Dorsey, and then Brian Brohm with their next pick. The only reason they signed Matt Ryan to a huge deal was to show that he's their new QB, the new face of the franchise. Over $10 million a year is too much for a rookie QB, yet to prove himself, and with many interceptions last year at Boston College. Anyways, QB's are much bigger risks than offensive or defensive lineman. If Atlanta wants to flash out their money, then so be it, but there are other holes to fill with even less money to spree.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:25 pm
I think it's a bluff too, but that would suck if they cancelled.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:15 pm
UWs TomboyHusky I think it's a bluff too, but that would suck if they cancelled. The NFL is too valuable and cherished in America to be canceled. I think it's a bluff, and if it's not, then it'll be resolved by then.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:40 pm
Oh it's so a bluff. People will literally die. American's love their football way too much! To live without it!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:12 pm
R.i.mm.y Oh it's so a bluff. People will literally die. American's love their football way too much! To live without it! Just in case, owners have already signed a lot of franchise-type players to long term contracts. Not for a season cancellation, but for an ending to a salary cap. We've seen Fitzgerald, Moss, Roethlisberger, and more.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:34 am
If the pros didn't play we would have strike football. There will always be football to watch
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|