|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jaiden Stryker Vice Captain
|
 Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:57 am
Seems we still have a problem with people not voting in battles. Because of this, many battles fail to reach a conclusion. So I have a couple questions:
1. If a battle has reached it's voting stage, and is sitting there for weeks/months without enough votes, should the person with the most votes be considered the winner? Or should the battle remain inconclusive?
2. Why wont you ingrates vote!?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:03 am
1. The battle should remain inconclusive because if you take a second look at the verses you might wind up voting for someone else than who you intended to vote for at first.
2. I'm just lazy. Eventually I vote though. xD.
In my opinion.
We need more people to vote, ie: get more current members to do it (who are interested) or recruit people who are interested in battles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
